نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه تهران

2 دانشگاه امام حسین (ع)

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش ساخت و بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی ابزاری برای سنجش میزان اطمینان درک شدۀ افراد در توانایی ورزش کردن بود. بر اساس مبانی نظری، نسخه 22 سؤالی پرسشنامه ساخته شد. سپس 567 تن (301 مرد و 249 زن) به‌صورت طبقه‌ای- در دسترس انتخاب شدند و به سؤالات پاسخ دادند.
میزان پایایی پرسشنامه از روش آلفای کرونباخ و دونیمه کردن به ترتیب برابر 975/0 و 944/0 به دست آمد. روایی صوری پرسشنامه بر اساس نظر 7 تن از متخصصین تأیید شد و نتایج تحلیل عامل اکتشافی بر وجود یک عامل در پرسشنامه دلالت داشت. همبستگی نمرات آزمون با نمرات خودکارآمدی شرر و اعتمادبه‌نفس صفتی ورزشی نیز بیانگر روایی سازه آن بود (به ترتیب 516/0= r و 738/0= r، 01/0p≤). همچنین همبستگی نمرات مشارکت‌کنندگان با میزان فعالیت بدنی آن‌ها نشان دهندۀ روایی ملاکی این ابزار بود (579/0= r، 01/0p≤). بنابراین پرسشنامه ساخته‌شده دارای روایی و پایایی قابل قبولی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Development of a Sport Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

نویسنده [English]

  • Iman Sahraeian 1

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument in measuring the level of confidence of individuals in their capabilities to perform sport tasks. A questionnaire with 22 items was made based on the theoretical framework. 567 individuals (301 males, 249 females) were chosen by stratified-available sampling and answered to these questions. The reliability of the questionnaire was 0.975 and 0.944 based on Cronbach’s alpha and split-half methods. The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by seven experts. CFA results showed that the questionnaire was impacted with one factor. The correlation between individuals’ test score and their efficiency and sport self-confidence scores was representative of the construct validity of the questionnaire (r=0.516 and r=0.738 respectively, p≤0.01). The correlation between the scores of the participants and their level of physical activity represented the criterion validity of the questionnaire (r=0.579, p≤0.01). Therefore, the questionnaire was of acceptable validity and reliability.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Validity
  • Reliability
  • Factor Analyze
  • Exercising Capability
  • Self-Confidence
  1. Anshel, M. H. (1997). Sport Psychology: From Theory to Practice (3rd edition). Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company.
  2. Asghar Nejad,T., Ahmadi,M., Farzad,V., Khoda Panahi, K. (2006). The study of Psychometric properties of Shere’s general self-efficiency scale. Journal of psychology, 39 (3): 262-274.[in persian]
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-eflicacy: The exercise of control: New York: Freeman.
  5. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
  6. Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 143-164.
  7. Bauman, A. E., Reis, R. S., Sallis, J. F., Wells, J. C., Loos, R. J., Martin, B. W., & Group, L. P. A. S. W. (2012). Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? The Lancet, 380(9838), 258-271.
  8. Burton, D., Naylor, N., & Holliday, B. (2000). Goal setting in sport: Investigating the goal effectiveness paradox. New York: John Wiely & Sons: Inc.
  9. Darker, C., French, D., Eves, F., & Sniehotta, F. (2010). An intervention to promote walking amongst the general population based on an ‘extended’theory of planned behaviour: a waiting list randomised controlled trial. Psychology and Health, 25(1), 71-88.

10. DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., . . . Kostas‐Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155-164.

11. Dishman, R. K., Motl, R. W., Saunders, R., Felton, G., Ward, D. S., Dowda, M., & Pate, R. R. (2005). Enjoyment mediates effects of a school-based physical-activity intervention. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 37(3), 478-487.

12. Feltz, D., Short, S., & Sullivan, P. (2008). Self efficacy in sport: Research and strategies for working with athletes, teams and coaches. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 3(2), 293-295.

13. Feltz, D. L. (1982). Path analysis of the causal elements in Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and an anxiety-based model of avoidance behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(4), 764.

14. Feltz, D. L., & Albrecht, R. R. (1986). The influence of self-efficacy on the approach/avoidance of a high-avoidance motor task. Psychology and sociology of sport, 3-25.

15. Feltz, D. L., & Lirgg, C. D. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs of athletes, teams, and coaches. Handbook of Sport Psychology, 340-361.

16. Feltz, D. L., & Mugno, D. A. (1983). A replication of the path analysis of the causal elements in Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and the influence of autonomic perception. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5(3), 263-277.

 

  1. George, T. R., Feltz, D. L., & Chase, M. A. (1992). Effects of model similarity on self-efficacy and muscular endurance: A second look. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(3), 237-248.

18. Gill, D. L. (2000). Psychological dynamics of sport and exercise . Human Kinetics.

19. Graves, B. (2011). The Influence of BMI and Self-Efficacy Levels on the Accuracy in Self-Reported Physical Activity Recall.

20. Hinton, P. (2004). Statistics explained: a guide for social science students, 1999: Routledge, London.

21. Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis: Routledge.

22. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity1. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575.

23. Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 241.

24. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-386.

25. Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: Springer.

26. Marsh, H. W. (1994). Sport motivation orientations: Beware of jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 16(4), 365-380.

27. McAuley, E., & Blissmer, B. (2000). Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 28(2), 85-88.

28. Moritz, S. E., Feltz, D. L., Fahrbach, K. R., & Mack, D. E. (2000). The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71(3), 280-294.

29. Olander, E. K., Fletcher, H., Williams, S., Atkinson, L., Turner, A., & French, D. P. (2013). What are the most effective techniques in changing obese individuals’ physical activity self-efficacy and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavior Nutr Phys Act, 10(29), 1-15.

30. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467.

31. Tenenbaum, G., & Eklund, R. C. (2012). Measurement in Sport and Exercise Psychology. Sport Psychologist, 26, 647-649.

32. Vaez Mousavi S.M.K., N. S., Azarbaijani M.A.,Mokhtari P. (2008). Psychometric Measures And Nrms For Trait Sort Cnfidence Inventory. Research on Sport Science, 6(18), 47 To 60. [In persian]

33. Weiss, M. R., McCullagh, P., Smith, A. L., & Berlant, A. R. (1998). Observational learning and the fearful child: Influence of peer models on swimming skill performance and psychological responses. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69(4), 380-394.

  1. Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents’ development of personal agency: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5, 45-69.

35. Zimmermann, B. J. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation: a social cognitive perspective. Handbook of self-regulation, 13-39.