تغییرات بازنمایی ذهنی بر اثر تمرین تصادفی و مسدود

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشگاه شیراز

2 استاد دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

3 دانشیار دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

هدف از تحقیق حاضر بررسی تغییرات بازنمایی ذهنی از تکلیف ضربه گلف بر اثر تمرین تصادفی و مسدود بود. 30 نفر شرکت­کننده به سه گروه تصادفی، مسدود و کنترل تقسیم شدند. ابتدا سطح اولیه بازنمایی ذهنی افراد تعیین شد و 18  کوشش را به عنوان پیش آزمون انجام دادند. سپس به مدت شش روز متوالی به تمرین تکلیف مورد نظر پرداختند. یک هفته بعد از آخرین جلسه تمرینی سطح نهایی بازنمایی ذهنی شرکت­کنندگان مورد سنجش قرار گرفت و 18  کوشش را به عنوان پس آزمون اجرا کردند. نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که گروه تصادفی نسبت به گروه مسدود در مرحله اکتساب خطای بیشتری انجام داده است اما در یادداری نسبت به این گروه عملکرد دقیقتری داشت. علاوه بر این نشان داده شد که گروه تصادفی نسبت به گروه مسدود بازنمایی ذهنی ساختاریافته­تری دارد و همچنین این ساختار مشابهت بیشتری با بازنمایی ذهنی افراد ماهر دارد. این نتایج نشان دهنده آن است که احتمالا دلیل یادگیری بهتر گروه تصادفی نسبت به مسدود ایجاد یک بازنمایی ساختاریافته­تر از تکلیف می­باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Mental Representation Changes due to Random and Blocked Practice

نویسنده [English]

  • Davoud fazeli 1
1 Assistance Professor, Shiraz University
2
3
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in mental representation in golf putting task due to random and blocked practice. Thirty participants were divided into random, blocked and control groups. First, the initial mental representation level of participants was measured and they performed 18 trials as pre-test. Then, they practiced the intended task for six consecutive days. A week after the last practice session their final mental representation level was measured and performed 18 trials as retention test. Results showed that random group had more errors than blocked group during acquisition, but performed more accurate than this group during retention. In addition, it was showed that random group have a more structured mental representation than blocked group and this representation is more like the skilled participants. This results showed that the cause of better learning by random group than blocked group probably is due to production of a more structured mental representation of the task.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Contextual Interference
  • Mental Representation
  • Random Practice
  • Blocked Practice

مراجع

  1. Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of motor behavior, 3(2): 111-150.
  2. Bläsing, B., Schack, T., & Brugger, P. (2010). The functional architecture of the human body: Assessing body representation by sorting body parts and activities. Experimental Brain Research, 203(1): 199-129.
  3. Bläsing, B., Tenenbaum, G., & Schack, T. (2009). The cognitive structure of movements in classical dance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(3): 350-360.
  4. Brady, F. (1998). A theoretical and empirical review of the contextual interference effect and the learning of motor skills. Quest, 50(3):266-293.
  5. Frank, C., Land, W. M., & Schack, T. (2013). Mental representation and learning: the influence of practice on the development of mental representation structure in complex action. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3):353-361.
  6. Hodges, N., & Williams, M. A. (2012). Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice: Routledge.
  7. Hodges, N. J., Huys, R., & Starkes, J. L. (2007). Methodological review and evaluation of research in expert performance in sport. Handbook of Sport Psychology, Third Edition,159-183.
  8. Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(4):730.
  9. Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1985). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? Advances in Psychology, 27: 3-22.
  10. Lee, T. D., Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1992). Contextual interference in motor learning: Dissociated effects due to the nature of task variations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44(4): 627-644.
  11. Lin, C.-H., Fisher, B. E., Winstein, C. J., Wu, A. D., & Gordon, J. (2008). Contextual interference effect: Elaborative processing or forgetting—Reconstruction? A post hoc analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation—Induced effects on motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40(6): 578-586.
  12. Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. (2014). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications (Vol. 11): McGraw-Hill New York.
  13. Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human movement science, 9(3):241-289.
  14. Morgan, A. (2014). Representations gone mental. Synthese, 191:213-294.
  15. Santos, J. M., & Embrechts, M. (2009). On the use of the adjusted rand index as a metric for evaluating supervised classification. Paper presented at the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks.
  16. Schack, T. (2004). The cognitive architecture of complex movement. International journal of sport and exercise psychology, 2(4): 403-438.
  17. Schack, T. (2012). Measuring mental representations. Measurement in sport and exercise psychology, 203-214.
  18. Schack, T., & Mechsner, F. (2006). Representation of motor skills in human long-term memory. Neuroscience letters, 391(3): 77-81.
  19. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological review, 82(4): 225-260.
  20. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. (1988). Motor control and learning: Human kinetics.
  21. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. (2005). Motor control and learning: Human kinetics
  22. Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(2):179.
  23. Stöckel, T., Hughes, C. M., & Schack, T. (2012). Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children. Psychological research, 76(6)768-776.
  24. Thomas, K. T., & Thomas, J. R. (1994). Developing expertise in sport: The relation of knowledge and performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology.
  25. Velentzas, K., Heinen, T., Tenenbaum, G., & Schack, T. (2010). Functional mental representation of volleyball routines in German youth female national players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22(4), 474-485.
  26. Weigelt, M., Ahlmeyer, T., Lex, H., & Schack, T. (2011). The cognitive representation of a throwing technique in judo experts–Technological ways for individual skill diagnostics in high-performance sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(3): 231-235.
  27. Williams, A. M., & Hodges, N. J. (2004). Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice: Routledge
  28. Wulf, G., & Lee, T. D. (1993). Contextual interference in movements of the same class: Differential effects on program and parameter learning. Journal of motor behavior,25(4):254-263.
مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی
دوره 7، شماره 26
بهمن 1397
صفحه 179-194

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 28 آذر 1395
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 06 اسفند 1395
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 22 اسفند 1395

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار