Sport Psychology Studies

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Reviewers

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Article Processing Charges (APC)

autor instruction

Forms

Peer Review Process

Determination of Factorial Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Long Flow Scale in Athletes

Document Type : Original research study

Authors

1 M. Sc Student of Motor Behavior, University of Semnan

2 Assistant Professor of Sport Psychology, University of Semnan

3 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, University of Semnan

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the factorial validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Long Flow Scale for athletes. For this purpose, 545 athletes were chosen and completed the Persian version of the Long Flow Scale. At first the face validity and translation accuracy were confirmed using back translation technique. To determine the questionnaire´s construct validity based on structural equations model was used; to determine internal consistency, Cronbach alpha coefficient was used, and to determine temporal reliability of the items, intra-class correlation coefficient under test-retest method was used. The results showed that the Long Flow Scale enjoyed favorable fit indexes. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that fit indexes (CFI=0.96, TLI=0.96, RMSEA=0.047), internal consistency (0.75), and temporal reliability (0.85) were suitable. So, the Long version of the Flow Scale can be characterized as a valid and reliable tool to study and evaluate the Long Flow Scale of Iranian athletes.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
  1. Catley, D., & Duda, J. L. (1997). Psychological antecedents of the frequency and intensity of flow in golfers. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28(4), 309-22.
  2. Chan, T. S., & Repman, J. (1999). Flow in web based instructional activity: An exploratory research project. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 5(3), 225-37.
  3. Chavez, E. J. (2008). Flow in sport: A study of college athletes. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 28(1), 69-91.
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow the psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial. nformation Design Journal 16(1), 75–77.
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). A reponse to the Kimiecik & Stein and Jackson papers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 4(2), 181-3.
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Toward a psychology of optimal experience. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 209-26). Springer Netherlands.
  7. Doganis, G., Iosifidou, P., & Vlachopoulos, S. (2000). Factor structure and internal consistency of the Greek version of the Flow State Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(3 suppl), 1231-40.
  8. Durand-Bush, N., Salmela, J. H., & Green-Demers, I. (2001). The Ottawa mental skills assessment tool (OMSAT-3*). The Sport Psychologist, 15(1), 1-19.
  9. Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 158-72.
  10. Fournier, J., Gaudreau, P., Demontrond-Behr, P., Visioli, J., Forest, J., & Jackson, S. (2007). French translation of the Flow State Scale-2: Factor structure, cross-cultural invariance, and associations with goal attainment. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(6), 897-16.
  11. Ghani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 381-91.
  12. Gill, D., Williams, L., & Reifsteck, E. (2017). Psychological dynamics of sport and exercise. Human Kinetics.pp, 60-1.
  13. Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417-32.
  14. Hashim, H. A., Zulkifli, E. Z., & Yusof Hazwani, A. (2010). Factorial validation of Malaysian Adapted Brunel Mood Scale in an adolescent sample. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine, 1(4), 185.
  15. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  16. Jackson, S. A. (1992). Athletes in flow: A qualitative investigation of flow states in elite figure skaters. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 4(2), 161-80.
  17. Jackson, S. A. (1995). Factors influencing the occurrence of flow state in elite athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 138-66.
  18. Jackson, S. A. (1996). Toward a conceptual understanding of the flow experience in elite athletes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(1), 76-90.
  19. Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The flow state scale–2 and dispositional flow scale–2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 133-50.
  20. Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 17-35.
  21. Jackson, S. A., & Roberts, G. C. (1992). Positive performance states of athletes: Toward a conceptual understanding of peak performance. The Sport Psychologist, 6(2), 156-71.
  22. Karageorghis, C. I., Vlachopoulos, S. P., & Terry, P. C. (2000). Latent variable modelling of the relationship between flow and exercise-induced feelings: An intuitive appraisal perspective. European Physical Education Review, 6(3), 230-48.
  23. Kashani, V., Farokhi, A., Kazemnejad, A., Shaikh, M. (2015). Validity and reliability of the Persian version of Sport Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ). Motor Behaviure, 20(7), 15-26. (In Persian).
  24. Kawabata, M., Mallett, C. J., & Jackson, S. A. (2008). The flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2: Examination of factorial validity and reliability for Japanese adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(4), 465-485. Kimiecik, S. A., & Jackson, J. C. (1998). Psychological correlates of flow in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 20, 358-78.
  25. Kline P. Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. 1st ed. New York: The Guildford Press; 2005. pp 201-3.
  26. Kowal, J., & Fortier, M. S. (1999). Motivational determinants of flow: Contributions from self-determination theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(3), 355-68.
  27. Marsh, H. W., & Jackson, S. A. (1999). Flow experience in sport: Construct validation of multidimensional, hierarchical state and trait responses. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(4), 343-71.
  28. Mels, G. (2006). LISREL for Windows: Getting started guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  29. Muzio, M. (2004). Sport: Flow e prestazione eccellente. Dai modelli teorici all'applicazione sul campo. Franco Angeli.
  30. Nicholls, A. R., Polman, R. C. J., & Holt, N. L. (2005). The effects of an individualized imagery interventions on flow states and golf performance. Athletic Insight, 7(1). pp 43-66.
  31. Penman, S., Cohen, M., Stevens, P., & Jackson, S. (2012). Yoga in Australia: Results of a national survey. International journal of yoga, 5(12), 92-101.
  32. Schutz, R. W., Gessaroli, M. E., Singer, R. N., Murphey, M., & Tennant, L. K. (1993). Use, misuse, and disuse of psychometrics in sport psychology research. Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology, 901-17.
  33. Singh, K., Junnarkar, M., & Kaur, J. (2016). Measures of Positive Psychology: Development and Validation. Springer.pp, 74-5.
  34. Stavrou, N. A., & Zervas, Y. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Flow State Scale in sports. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2, 161-81.
  35. Stein, G. L., Kimiecik, J. C., Daniels, J., & Jackson, S. A. (1995). Psychological antecedents of flow in recreational sport. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(2), 125-35.
  36. Sugiyama, T., & Inomata, K. (2005). Qualitative examination of flow experience among top Japanese athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills; 100(3 Pt 2):969-82.
  37. Swann, C., Keegan, R. J., Piggott, D., & Crust, L. (2012). A systematic review of the experience, occurrence, and controllability of flow states in elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(6), 807-19.
  38. Tenenbaum, G., Fogarty, G. J., & Jackson, S. A. (1999). The flow experience: A rasch analysis of Jackson’s Flow State Scale. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3, 278-94.
  39. Terry, P. C., Lane, A. M., & Fogarty, G. J. (2003). Construct validity of the Profile of Mood States—Adolescents for use with adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(2), 125-39.
  40. Thomas, J. R., Silverman, S., & Nelson, J. (2015). Research methods in physical activity. (7th ed). Human Kinetics. P. 208.
  41. Vlachopoulos, S. P., Karageorghis, C. I., & Terry, P. C. (2000). Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the Flow State Scale in exercise. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18, 815-23.
  42. Wiggins, M. S., & Freeman, P. (2000). Anxiety and flow: An examination of anxiety direction and the flow experience. International Sports Journal, 4(2), 78-87.
  43. Zeidabadi, R., Rezaie, F., & Motashareie, E. (2014). Psychometric Properties and Normalization of Persian Version of Ottawa Mental Skills Assessment Tools (OMSAT-3). Sport Psychology Review, Sport Sciences Research Institute of Iran. 3(7), 63-82. 
Sport Psychology Studies
Volume 6, Issue 21
Fall 2017
November 2017
Pages 149-174
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 28 September 2016
  • Revise Date: 02 October 2017
  • Accept Date: 09 October 2017
Share
How to cite
Statistics