Document Type : Original research study

Authors

1 Professor / Tabriz University

2 Ph.D/ Razi University of Kermanshah

Abstract

In the present study the software of motor performance assessment in pursuit tasks is presented with ability to calculate root mean square error as an important measure of errors to evaluate motor performance. Based on this research desired indices, the computer software was designed and developed using MATLAB, C++, C programming languages. To determine construct validity, the correlation coefficient between manual results and automatic calculated results was assessed which was equal to 1 correlation. Furthermore, subjects were asked to follow the circle, square and triangle paths of rotary pursuit device which resulted in 0/83 correlation. This software having multiple applications, benefits from the advantage to be easily used by researchers and users with different levels and has a very accurate output.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Sharif Nejad, A., & Bahram, A. (2005). Designing, development and reliability evaluation of instrument for motor performance assessment. Research on Sport Sciences, 9, 29-44. (In Persian).
  2. Payne, V. G., & Isaacs, L. D. (2017). Human motor development: A lifespan approach. Abingdon: Routledge.
  3. Gabin B, Camerino O, Anguera MT, Castañer M. (2012). Lince: multiplatform sport analysis software. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4692-4694.
  4. Bagheri Kudakani S, Lenjannejadian Sh, Hajlotfalian M. (2014). Designing, validation, and reliability assessment of software to acquire kinematics parameters of motion by image processing. Research in Sport Medicine and Technology, 27(11), 39-52.
  5. Sañudo, B., Rueda, D., del Pozo-Cruz, B., de Hoyo, M., & Carrasco, L. (2016). Validation of a video analysis software package for quantifying movement velocity in resistance exercises. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 30(10), 2934-2941.
  6. Travassos, B., Davids, K., Araújo, D., & Esteves, T. P. (2013). Performance analysis in team sports: Advances from an Ecological Dynamics approach. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 13(1), 83-95.
  7. Ekegren, C. L., Gabbe, B. J., & Finch, C. F. (2016). Sports injury surveillance systems: a review of methods and data quality. Sports Medicine, 46(1), 49-65.
  8. Prado, M. T. A., Fernani, D. C. G. L., da Silva, T. D., Smorenburg, A. R., de Abreu, L. C., & de Mello Monteiro, C. B. (2017). Motor learning paradigm and contextual interference in manual computer tasks in individuals with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 64, 56-63.
  9. Sohrabi M. (2012). Comparison of effects of random and blocked physical exercise and mental imagery on performance and learning of pursuit task. (Unpublished Masterʼs thesis). Kharazmi University, Tehran. (In Persian).
  10. Miall, R. C., & Jenkinson, E. W. (2005). Functional imaging of changes in cerebellar activity related to learning during a novel eye–hand tracking task. Experimental Brain Research, 166(2), 170-183.
  11. Hong, Z., Chen, Z., Wang, C., Mei, X., Prokhorov, D., & Tao, D. (2015). Multi-store tracker (muster): A cognitive psychology inspired approach to object tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 749-758).  Boston: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition .
  12. Gratton, C., & Jones, I. (2014). Research methods for sports studies. (A. Farahani & Z. Bavarsad, translators). Tehran: Hatmi. 2nd ed. (In Persian).
  13. Kashef, M. (2003). Revision and correction of preliminary practical test for physical education students, Research Institute of Physical Education, Tehran. (In Persian).
  14. Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. I. (2007). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications (Vol. 11). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  15. Schmidt, R., & Lee, T. (2013). Motor learning and performance, 5E with web study guide: from principles to application. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  16. Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach. Champaign: Human Kinetics.  
  17. Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 987.
  18. Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. J. (2011). Research methods in physical activity. Champaign: Human Kinetics,
  19. Teymoori Kheravi, M., Abdoli, B., Farsi, A., & Ahmadi, E. (2012). The effect of mental and physical practice on the learning of rotary pursuit skill generalized motor program and parameter. Research on Rehabilitation sciences, 8(2), 227-236. (In Persian).
  20. Currell, K., & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2008). Validity, reliability and sensitivity of measures of sporting performance. Sports Medicine, 38(4), 297-316.
  21. Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2004). Motor learning and performance. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  22. Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44(1), 75-84.