The effect of monitoring and outcome pressure during decision making on the visual search behavior of football players

Document Type : Original research

Authors

1 motor behavior.Physical Education.university of Tehran. Tehran. Iran

2 Professor, Movement Behavior and Sports Analysis, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

the aim of this study was to investigated The effect of monitoring and outcome pressure during decision making on the visual search behavior of football players. In this study, 18 soccer players employed in the Tehran youth premier league participated. The decision making task included images of soccer simulation conditions presented by the monitor in three conditions: neutral (no pressure), outcome pressure and monitoring pressure. The result of repeated measures analysis of variance test showed a significant difference in the number of fixation and during fixation in three conditions. In addition, the Bonferroni post-hoc test showed a significant increase in mean number of fixation and mean duration fixation in outcome and monitoring pressure compared to neutral pressure.Therefore, soccer coaches are suggested to help the players in training sessions by creating pressure conditions so that they can perform better in the competition conditions by experiencing these conditions during training.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Allsop, J., & Gray, R. (2015). Flying under pressure: Effects of anxiety on attention and gaze behavior in aviation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,3(2), 63-71.
  2. Bar-Eli, M., Plessner, H., & Raab, M. (2011). Judgment, decision-making and success in sport: John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 610.
  4. Baumeister, R. F., & Showers, C. J. (1968). A review of paradoxical performance effects: Choking under pressure in sports and mental tests. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16(4), 361-
  5. Beilock, S. L., Kulp, C. A., Holt, L. E., & Carr, T. H. (2004). More on the fragility of performance: choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 584.
  6.  

 

 
  1. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(3), 324.
  2. Chib, V. S., De Martino, B., Shimojo, S., & O'Doherty, J. P. (2012). Neural mechanisms underlying paradoxical performance for monetary incentives are driven by loss aversion. Neuron, 74(3), 582-594.
  3. Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Visual attention. Blackwell handbook of perception, 272310.
  4. DeCaro, M. S., Thomas, R. D., Albert, N. B., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Choking under pressure: Multiple routes to skill failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3)), 390.
  5. Eysenck, M., & Wilson, M. (2016). Pressure and sport performance: A cognitive approach. Introducing attentional control theory: Sport. An introduction to applied cognitive psychology, 329-350.
  6. Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion,6(6), 409-434.
  7. Ghotbi, a., Shahbazi, M., Arab Amery, E., & Tahmasebi Broujeni, S. (2019). The study of vision control mechanisms of novice golf players under anxious conditions. The Journal Of Psychological Science, 18(74), 153-158. (persian)
  8. Gucciardi, D. F., & Dimmock, J. A. (2008). Choking under pressure in sensorimotor skills: Conscious processing or depleted attentional resources? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(1), 45-59.
  9. Hanton, S., Neil, R., & Mellalieu, S. D. (2008). Recent developments in competitive anxiety direction and competition stress research. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 45-57.
  10. Jackson, R. C., Kinrade, N. P., Hicks, T., & Wills, R. (2013). Individual propensity for reinvestment: Field-based evidence for the predictive validity of three scales. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 44(4), 331-350.
  11. Jones, G. (1995). More than just a game: Research developments and issues in competitive anxiety in sport. British journal of psychology, 86(4), 449-478.
  12. Kinrade, N. P., Jackson, R. C., & Ashford, K. J. (2015). Reinvestment, task complexity and decision making under pressure in basketball. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 20, 11-19.
  13. Lewis, B. , & Linder, D. E. (1997). Thinking about choking? Attentional processes and paradoxical performance. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 23(9), 937-944.
  14. MacMahon, C., Baker, J., & Farrow, D. (2013). Developing sport expertise: Researchers and coaches put theory into practice: Routledge.
  15. Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. (2010). Motor learning and control. McGraw-Hill Publishing.‏
  16. Mehrsafar, A. h. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 6(23), 189-211. (persian)
  17. Mesagno, C., Harvey, J. T., & Janelle, C. M. (2011). Self-presentation origins of choking: Evidence from separate pressure manipulations. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 33(3), 441-459.
  18. mohammadzade, H., parsafar, P., dehghanizade, J. (2020). A Comparison of Gaze Behaviors and Decision Making in Skilled and Novice Football Players. Journal of Motor Learning and Movement, 11(1), 123-133.
  19. Nieuwenhuys, A., & Oudejans, R. R. (2012). Anxiety and perceptual-motor performance: toward an integrated model of concepts, mechanisms, and processes. Psychological Research, 76(6), 747-759.
  20. Nieuwenhuys, A., Pijpers, J. R., Oudejans, R. R., & Bakker, F. C. (2008). The influence of anxiety on visual attention in climbing. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(2), 171-185.
  21. Parkin, B. L., & Walsh, V. (2017). Gunslingers, poker players, and chickens 3: Decision making under mental performance pressure in junior elite athletes Progress in brain research, 234, 339-
  22. Runswick, O. R., Roca, A., Williams, A. M., Bezodis, N. E., & North, J. S. (2018). The effects of anxiety and situation-specific context on perceptual–motor skill: A multi-level investigation. Psychological Research, 82(4), 708-719.
  23. Shams, Z., Tahmasebi Boroujeni, S., bohloul, A. (2020). The effect of positive and negative emotions on decision making of football players. Sport Psychology Studies (persian).
  24. Vazini Taher, A., rezaei, F. (2019). The Comparison of Elite Male Soccer Players Decision Making Behavior under Different Motivational and Exercise Situations. Sport Psychology Studies, 8(27), 113-128 (persian).
  25. Williams, A. M., & Elliott, D. (1999). Anxiety, expertise, and visual search strategy in karate. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21(4), 362-375.
  26. Williams, A. M. & Hodges, N. J. (2004). Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice: Routledge.

 

  1. Wilson, M. R., Vine, S. J., & Wood, G. (2009). The influence of anxiety on visual attentional control in basketball free throw shooting. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31(2), 152-168.

 

Sport Psychology Studies
Volume 13, Issue 47
April 2024
Pages 35-48

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 March 2021
  • Revise Date: 20 April 2021
  • Accept Date: 29 April 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics