Sport Psychology Studies

Sport Psychology Studies

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Risky Decision-Making of Student Chess Players Based on their Introverted and Extroverted Personality Traits

Document Type : Original research

Authors
Shahrouz Ghayebzadeh 1
Mehrdad Moharramzadeh 2
Maryam Zoghi 3
1 Post-doctoral Researcher of Sport Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 Sport Management Department, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
3 Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia
10.22089/spsyj.2025.17731.2546
Abstract
The aim of this research was to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on risky decision-making in student chess players, taking into account their personality traits. In this study, 28 high school students who were active in chess and participated in provincial and national chess leagues were selected. Based on the NEO Five-Factor Inventory of personality traits, they were divided into two groups: 14 extroverted students (17 ± 0.88) and 14 introverted students (16.5 ± 1.02). Each participant attended three separate sessions in the laboratory, with a minimum 72-hour rest period between sessions. In each session, participants performed the Iowa Gambling Task and the Lichess computer game before any stimulation. They were then subjected to one of three conditions: right anodal/left cathodal, right cathodal/left anodal, or sham stimulation, for 20 minutes at 2 mA intensity over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. After the stimulation, participants repeated the Iowa Gambling Task and the Lichess computer game. Data analysis using two-way mixed ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the Iowa Gambling Task between right anodal/left cathodal and right cathodal/left anodal stimulation based on personality traits (p = 0.001). The findings of this study indicated that transcranial direct current stimulation had a differential effect on decision-making in chess players based on their personality traits. Specifically, the study’s results showed that extroverted players exhibited more risk-taking behaviour, while introverted players acted more cautiously.
Keywords
Extroverted
Brain stimulation
Risky Decision-making
Introverted
Chess

Subjects

1.       Acuna, S. T., Gomez, M. & Juristo N. (2009). “How do personality, team  processes and task characteristics relate to job satisfaction and software quality?”, Information and Software Technology, No. 51, pp: 627-639.
2.       Afshari, M., Majidi, M., Yadolahzadeh, A. (2022). Risky Decision Making and Impulsivity in Adolescents’ Chess Players: Does Chess Modify or Induce Risky Decisions?. International Journal of Pediatrics, 10(5), 16101-16111. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijp.2020.51599.4100
3.       Anshel, M. H., Kang, M., & Jubenville, C. (2013). Sources of acute sport stress scale for sports officials: Rasch calibration. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 362-370.
4.       Barratt, E. S. (1993). Impulsivity: Integrating cognitive, behavioral, biological, and environmental data. In W. B. McCown, J. L. Johnson, and M. B. Shure (Eds.), The impulsive client: Theory, research and treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.  pp: 39-45.
5.       Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1-3), 7–15.
6.       Bechara, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cerebral cortex, 6(2), 215-225.
7.       Bechara, A., & Van Der Linden, M. (2005). Decision-making and impulse control after frontal lobe injuries. Current opinion in neurology, 18(6), 734-739.
8.       De la Torre, O. M., Valero-Cabré, A., Gallardo-Pujol, D., & Redolar-Ripoll, D. (2022). Modulatory effect of non-invasive prefrontal brain stimulation on risk-taking behaviours in humans: preliminary insight on the influence of personality traits.
9.       De la Torre, O. M., Vázquez, J. C., Gallardo-Pujol, D., & Redolar-Ripoll, D. (2021). Multifocal transcranial direct current stimulation reduces risk-taking depending on personality. Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation, 14(6), 1591.
10.   Dockery, C. A., Hueckel-Weng, R., Birbaumer, N., & Plewnia, C. (2009). Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(22), 7271–7277. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0065-09.2009
11.   Ellemberg, D., & St-Louis-Deschênes, M. (2010). The effect of acute physical exercise on cognitive function during development. Psychology of Sport and exercise, 11(2), 122-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.09.006
12.   Filho, E., Tenenbaum, G., Yang, Y. (2015). Cohesion, team mental models and collective efficacy: towards an integrated model of team dynamics in sport. J. Sports Sci. 33, 641–653.
13.   Gandiga, P. C., Hummel, F. C., & Cohen, L. G. (2006). Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(4), 845–850, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003
14.   Ghayebzadeh, S., Zardoshtian, S., sabourimoghaddam, H., Amiri, E., & Giboin, l.-s. (2021). The effect of Different Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Risky Decision-Making in Sports Referees. Sport Physiology, 13(51), 117-138. In Persian https://doi.org/10.22089/spj.2021.10363.2126  
15.   Ghayebzadeh, S., Zardoshtian, S., sabourimoghaddam, H., Amiri, E., Giboin, L. (2021). The Interventional Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the factors influencing in risky decision-making of sport referees based on leadership styles. (Ph.D. thesis), Razi university, Kermanshah, Iran. In Persian
16.   Ghayebzadeh, S., Zardoshtian, S., sabourimoghaddam, h., Amiri, E., & Giboin, l.-s. (2022). The Effect of Different Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Impulsivity in Sports Referees: The Role of Leadership Styles. Sport Psychology Studies, 10(38), 1-22. In Persian https://doi.org/10.22089/spsyj.2021.10300.2137
17.   Giboin, L. S., & Gruber, M. (2018). Anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation can decrease force output of knee extensors during an intermittent MVC fatiguing task in young healthy male participants. J Neurosci Res, 96(9), 1600-1609. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24254.
18.   Habibi, S., & Saydi, S. (2023). A comparison of personality traits, impulsivity, and decision-making styles among offending and non-offending drivers. Master's thesis in clinical psychology, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch. In Persian
19.   Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2009). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making. Sage Publications.
20.   Huang, D., Chen, S., Wang, S., Shi, J., Ye, H., Luo, J., & Zheng, H. (2017). Activation of the DLPFC reveals an asymmetric effect in risky decision making: evidence from a tDCS study. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 38.
21.   Kazemi, F., Yektayar, M., & Abad, A. M. B. (2012). Investigation the impact of chess play on developing meta-cognitive ability and math problem-solving power of students at different levels of education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 372-379.
22.   Levitch, C. F., Ifrah, C., Kim, M., Stewart, W. F., Lipton, R. B., Zimmerman, M. E., & Lipton, M. L. (2020). Personality and risk taking in sports: a focus on unintentional and intentional head impacts in amateur soccer players. Clinical journal of sport medicine, 30(5), 484-488.
23.   McKelvie, S. J., Lemieux, P., & Stout, D. (2003). Extraversion and neuroticism in contact athletes, no contact athletes and non-athletes: A research note. Athletic insight, 5(3), 19-27.
24.   Naranjo-Gil, D., Gómez-Ruiz, L., & Sánchez-Expósito, M.J. (2011). Neuroscience and management: Challenges for Behavioural Research in Organizations. Journal of Positive Management, 2, 45-58.
25.   Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 527(3), 633–639, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
26.   Ota, K., Shinya, M., & Kudo, K. (2019). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Risk-Attitude in Motor Decision-Making. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 13, 297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00297
27.   Owens, M. M., Hyatt, C. S., Gray, J. C., Carter, N. T., MacKillop, J., Miller, J. D., & Sweet, L. H. (2019). Cortical morphometry of the five-factor model of personality: Findings from the Human Connectome Project full sample. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14(4), 381-395.
28.   Peña-Gómez, C., Vidal-Pineiro, D., Clemente, I. C., Pascual-Leone, A., & Bartres-Faz, D. (2011). Down-regulation of negative emotional processing by transcranial direct current stimulation: effects of personality characteristics. PloS one, 6(7), e22812.
29.    Priori, A. (2003). Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(4), 589–595.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00437-6
30.   Reason, J. (2000). Human error: models and management. The Western journal of medicine, 172(6), 393-396. https://doi.org/10.1136/ewjm.172.6.393
31.   Reteig, L. C., Talsma, L. J., van Schouwenburg, M. R., & Slagter, H. A. (2017). Transcranial electrical stimulation as a tool to enhance attention. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0010-y
32.   Royal JD and Kurtz JL. (2010). I ate what?! The effect of stress and dispositional eating style on food intake and behavioral awareness. Personality and Individual Difference, 49 (6): 565-9.
33.   Sofizadeh, P., Esmaeili, A., & Sobhi gharameleki, N. (2023). Personality traits and mental skills in football, weightlifting and bodybuilding athletes. Journal of Sports Psychology, 16(1).In Persian https://doi.org/10.48308/mbsp.2024.232114.1210
34.   Tayeb, Y., & Lavidor, M. (2016). Enhancing switching abilities: improving practice effect by stimulating the dorsolateral pre frontal cortex. Neuroscience, 313, 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.11.050
35.   Tok, S. (2011). The big five personality traits and risky sport participation. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 39(8), 1105-1111.
36.   Trninić, V., Trninić, M., & Penezić, Z. (2016). Personality differences between the players regarding the type of sport and age. Acta Kinesiologica, 10(2), 69-74.
37.   VaezMousavi, M., Shams, A.(2017). Mental Health of Iranian Elite Athletes. Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion ,5 (3) :191-202. In Persian
38.   Weidacker, K., Weidemann, C. T., Boy, F., & Johnston, S. J. (2016). Cathodal tDCS improves task performance in participants high in Coldheartedness. Clinical Neurophysiology, 127(9), 3102-3109.
39.   Wessel, T. C., & Aciego, R. (2017). Neuropsychological impact of chess on executive functions and attention of adolescents: A quasi-experimental pilot study. ResearchGate. Universidad de La Laguna.
40.   Woods, A. J., Antal, A., Bikson, M., Boggio, P. S., Brunoni, A. R., Celnik, P., Cohen, L. G., Fregni, F., Hermann, C. S., Kappenman, E. S., Knotkova, H., Liebetnz, D., Miniussi, C., Miranda, P. C., Paulus, W., Priori, A., Reato, D., Stagg, C., Wenderoth, N. & Nitsche, M. A. (2016). A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clinical Neurophysiology, 127(2), 1031–1048
Sport Psychology Studies
Volume 14, Issue 53
Summer 2025
Pages 43-59

  • Receive Date 07 February 2025
  • Revise Date 19 April 2025
  • Accept Date 02 June 2025