1. Barbot, A., Landy, M. S., & Carrasco, M.(2011). Exogenous attention enhances 2nd-order contrast sensitivity. Vision research, 51(9), 1086-1098.
2. Brisson, B., & Jolicœur, P. (2007a). Electrophysiological evidence of central interference in the control of visuospatial attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 126-132.
3. Brisson, B., & Jolicœur, P. (2007b). A psychological refractory period in access to visual short‐term memory and the deployment of visual–spatial attention: Multitasking processing deficits revealed by event‐related potentials. Psychophysiology, 44(2), 323-333.
4. Brisson, B., Leblanc, É., & Jolicœur, P. (2009). Contingent capture of visual-spatial attention depends on capacity-limited central mechanisms: Evidence from human electrophysiology and the psychological refractory period. Biological Psychology, 80(2), 218-225.
5. Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision research, 51(13), 1484-1525.
6. Carrasco, M. (2014). Spatial covert attention: Perceptual modulation. The Oxford handbook of attention, 183-230.
7. Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Chapter nine visual attention.
8. Eriksen, C. W., Webb, J. M., & Fournier, L. R. (1990). How much processing do nonattended stimuli receive? Apparently very little, but. Perception & Psychophysics, 47(5), 477-488.
9. Herrmann, K., Montaser-Kouhsari, L., Carrasco, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2010). When size matters: attention affects performance by contrast or response gain. Nature neuroscience, 13(12), 1554-1559.
10. Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: An attentional blink study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 664.
11. Johnston, J. C., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (1995). Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychological Science, 365-369.
12. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort: Citeseer.
13. Lien, M.-C., Croswaite, K., & Ruthruff, E. (2011). Controlling spatial attention without central attentional resources: Evidence from event-related potentials. Visual Cognition, 19(1), 37-78.
14. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Goodin, Z., & Remington, R. W. (2008). Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 509.
15. Martell, S. G., & Vickers, J. N. (2004). Gaze characteristics of elite and near-elite athletes in ice hockey defensive tactics. Human movement science, 22(6), 689-712.
16. Montagna, B., Pestilli, F., & Carrasco, M. (2009). Attention trades off spatial acuity. Vision research, 49(7), 735-745.
17. Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(4), 1023.
18. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological bulletin, 116(2), 220.
19. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(1), 19-45.
20. Pashler, H. E., & Sutherland, S. (1998). The psychology of attention (Vol. 15): MIT press Cambridge, MA.
21. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 32(1), 3-25.
22. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance X: Control of language processes, 32, 531-556.
23. Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., Van Selst, M., Whitsell, S., & Remington, R. (2003). Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 280.
24. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. (1988). Motor control and learning: Human kinetics.
25. Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2015). Cognitive psychology: Nelson Education.
26. Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2002). All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon. Psychological research, 66(4), 274-286.
27. Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 3.
)