Criminological Analysis of Failure Theory - Aggression in the Violence of Football Spectators

Document Type : Original research

Authors

1 Department of low , faculty of literature and hu man sciences .islamic Azad univer sity Eslamshahr Iran

2 Department of Physical Education & Sport Science, College of human science, Science and research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the failure-aggression theory of violence among spectators from Esteghlal and Persepolis teams of Tehran from a criminological point of view. In this semi-experimental study 386 independent supporters of Tehran's Independence and Propulsion method were selected randomly. The research data were a questionnaire.  The researcher has been compiled in two parts of individual information and practice with 30 questions. In two levels descriptive and non-analytic statistics (Pearson correlation coefficient) are used.  The PASS version 19 was used at the significant level of P = 0.05. The findings of this study emphasized the overcoming of violence in the verbal dimension and subjects such as failure to attend the stadium the popular team's defeat inadequate judging of the referee and the inappropriate play of the popular team the violence of football fans is effective.  Overcoming the variable of the defeat of the popular team and the judge's inadequate judgment.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Abdoll, B. (2004). psychosocial principle, inphysical Education and teching. Tehran Bamdad book publishing, p:8.
  2. Argyle, M. (1993). bodily communication Toutledege, P:52.
  3. Arnson, E. (1996). social psychology.Translation Hossein shekar shekan. publishing Roshd, p:220.  [In Presian]
  4. Arian pour, A., and Arian pour, M. (2002). Dictionary. Tehran, Amir kabir publishin , p:25.
  5. Alder man, R. (1974). psychological Behavior, in sport, p: 254.
  6. Atkinson, R., and,At kinson, R,.and Smith, E., and Bom, D. (1993). In troudction of psychology.Brace Jovanovich Harcourt Publishers,p:78.
  7. Anbari, M. (2006). investigating the causes of violence among football fans. Research project of Tehran university Jahad, P:38.
  8. Baron, R., and Byron, D. (1993). social psychology, Understanding Human Interection, Allyn and Bacon. P:351.
  9. Berkwist, l. (1986). Asurvey of social psychology. CBS college publishing, p:52.
  10. Cashmore, E. (1998). Making sense of sports Routledege. p: 24.
  11. Coakly, J. 1998). sport in society, issues ans controversies, p:529.
  12. 12, Courakis, N. (2004). football violence, Not only a Britsh problem. European Journal on criminal policy, p:181.
  13. Duning, E. (2003). Sociology of sport in the Balance Reflection on some Resent and more Enduring Trends. University of Leicester social science Research, P:221.
  14. Eftekhari, A. (2001). Violence and society. Tehran, mofid pulishig. p: 12.
  15. Fathi, H. (2003). sports and colleyball. Tehran, Amirkabir Publishing, p: 84.
  16. Ger. T. (20000). why do humans rebal. Tehran, strategic Research Publisher, P:215.
  17. Ghasemi, V., Zoulaktaf, v., Noorallivand, A. (2008). Sociologyof sportTehran, Publishing sociologists, p: 90.
  18. Karchfield, R. (1968). mindividual and community. translator Mahmoud sanaie, Zavar publishing, p:46. [In Presian]
  19. Keyniya, M. (1995). criminal psychology.  volum1, Tehran,Roushd Publishing, p:63.
  20. Luis, R. (2009). violence of Audiences and social impairments in the United states. Translation and Research by Ali Hodavand, Journal sport Exercise-Development, p: 140, [In Presian]
  21. Jarvis, M. (2001). sports psychology. khakecand. publishing. Translator noor Ali khajevand, Tehran, Kowsar publishing, p:97.
  22. Janoren, P. (1998).  Vandalism,Word disease. translator farrokh, Mahan saboteur Journal of the year 26, N ,299, p:59., [In Presian]
  23. Mohseni tabrizi, A (1999).  Experimental cenduism, Review of findings of Research. social sciences, letter, N ,16, p:136.
  24. NAIA social Assistant (1996) soccer, social violence, social identity. p:74.
  25. Nikbakt, s. (2014). Grouns for the Tendency toward violence against the criminologists. Tehran, Ava book publishing, p:115.
  26. Najafi Abrand Abadi,A.,and  Hashem beygi, H. (2000) .Encyclo university.p:71.
  27. Najafi  tavana, A. (2008) , criminology, khate sevvom pulishing, P:42.
  28. pearson, G. (2006). Holiganism, football industry. Groud, unicercity, of Liverpool, p:55.
  29. Saduk, B.,and saduk, j., and virgin A. (2008). psychoanalysis of Beharvioral science. translateor Farzin Rezaei, Tehran, Arjmand publishing, p:135. [In Presian]
  30. Spaij, R (2006). Aspects of Hiiliganism violence.,Amsterdam school for social scince Research,  p:82.
  31. Terry,peter, and Jackson , jonj (1985) . the Determinats and controlof violence in sport. Quest 37,  p:41.
Sport Psychology Studies
Volume 7, Issue 26
March 2019
Pages 151-166

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 June 2018
  • Revise Date: 10 August 2018
  • Accept Date: 26 August 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics