Document Type : Original research study
Authors
1 Phd Student, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Urmia University, Iran
2 Member of the Faculty of Physical Education, University of Urmia
3 Islamic Azad University, Urmia Branch
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of practicing under high psychological pressure on performance in laboratory and competition conditions. Totally, 60 participants (mean age=21.4±2.6) were selected using available sampling method and divided into two high and low psychological pressure groups. The basketball jump shot was used as the target task in the current study. Participants practiced the task for 10 sessions. The retention and transfer (performance in a real match) tests were conducted 48 hours after the last session of practice. The throwing accuracy of participants was assessed by AAHPERD test. The results showed that there was no significant difference between groups in retention test. However, in the transfer test, the high psychological pressure group had higher accuracy than the low one. These results interpreted the practice specificity hypothesis.
Keywords
Main Subjects
2. Allsop, J. E., Lawrence, G. P., Gray, R., & Khan, M. A. (2017). The interaction between practice and performance pressure on the planning and control of fast target directed movement. Psychological research, 81(5), 1004-1019.
3. Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of experimental psychology: General, 130(4), 701.
4. Dana A, Eshgarf S, Bagheri S. (2019) The effect of manipulating of attentional focus on performance of top- spine strike of skilled and novice table tennis players under high psychological pressure. Motor behavior. Articles in Press. In Persian
5. Gray, R., & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2015). Attentional focus, perceived target size, and movement kinematics under performance pressure. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 22(6), 1692-1700.
6. Gray, R., Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2007). “As soon as the bat met the ball, I knew it was gone”: Outcome prediction, hindsight bias, and the representation and control of action in expert and novice baseball players. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 669-675.
7. Land, W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2012). An outcome-and process-oriented examination of a golf-specific secondary task strategy to prevent choking under pressure. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 24(3), 303-322.
8. Magill, R. A., Anderson, D. I. (2014). Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. Australia: McGraw-Hill.
9. Mesagno, C., & Beckmann, J. (2017). Choking under pressure: theoretical models and interventions. Current opinion in psychology, 16, 170-175.
10. Mesagno, C., & Beckmann, J. (2017). Choking under pressure: theoretical models and interventions. Current opinion in psychology, 16, 170-175.
11. Movahedi, A., Sheikh, M., Bagherzadeh, F., Hemayattalab, R., & Ashayeri, H. (2007). A practice-specificity-based model of arousal for achieving peak performance. Journal of motor behavior, 39(6), 457-462.
12. Proteau, L. (1992). On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In Advances in psychology. (pp 67-103). North-Holland.
13. Reeves, J. L., Tenenbaum, G., & Lidor, R. (2007). Choking in front of the Goal: The effects of self‐consciousness training. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5(3), 240-254.
14. Roberts, L. J., Jackson, M. S., & Grundy, I. H. (2017). Choking under pressure: Illuminating the role of distraction and self-focus. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-21.
15. Tremblay, L., & Proteau, L. (1998). Specificity of practice: The case of powerlifting. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 69(3), 284-289.
16. Tremblay, L., & Proteau, L. (2001). Specificity of practice in a ball interception task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 55(3), 207.
17. Yu, R. (2015). Choking under pressure: the neuropsychological mechanisms of incentive-induced performance decrements. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 9, 19.
)