نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترای یادگیری حرکتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران
2 استاد رفتارحرکتی و روانشناسی ورزشی، دانشگاه تبریز
3 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران
چکیده
هدف از پژوهش حاضر، تعیین ارتباط بین تبحر حرکتی با بهرة هوشی و مقایسة تبحر حرکتی در رده‌های سنی مختلف بود. جامعة آماری پژوهش را کلیة پسران 10ـ7 سال و 15ـ12 سال و نیز تمامی دانشجویان پسر 21ـ18 سال دانشگاه تهران تشکیل دادند. نمونة پژوهش در هر‌یک از گروه‌های سنی برابر با 120 نفر بود که به روش خوشه‌ای هدفمند انتخاب شدند. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که ارتباط تبحر حرکتی با بهرة هوشی در سنین کودکی و جوانی بالا است؛ اما در سنین نوجوانی بسیار پایین می‌باشد. میانگین تبحر حرکتی نوجوانان نیز پایین‌تر از کودکان و جوانان است؛ بنابراین، می‌توان ادعا نمود که بهرة هوشی با تبحر حرکتی ارتباط دارد؛ اما این ارتباط در سنین مختلف با یکدیگر متفاوت می‌باشد (در‌این‌زمینه نیاز به پژوهش‌های بیشتر است).
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Relationship between Motor Proficiency and Intelligence Quotient at Different Age Categories
نویسندگان [English]
- Behzad Mohammadi Orangi 1
- Mohammad Taghi Aghdasi 2
- Rasoul Yaali 3
1 Ph. D. Student of Motor Learning, Kharazmi University of Tehran
2 Professor of Motor Behavior and Sports Psychology, University of Tabriz
3 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Kharazmi University of Tehran
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this study was to determine a relationship between intelligent quotient and motor proficiency and comparing motor proficiency in different age categories. Population was seven to 10 years old boys and 12-15 male students and also 18-21 male students from Tehran University. Sample was 120 people in each age group that were chosen by cluster sampling. Results showed that relationship between motor proficiency and intelligence quotients in children and adolescence is high but in youth is very low and youth motor proficiency average is lower than children adolescence. Therefore, it could be argued that IQ is associated with motor proficiency but this relationship is varied at different ages of course more researches are needed in this field.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Motor Proficiency
- Intelligence Quotient
- Children
- Adolescents
- Youth
2. Bruininks, R. H. (2005). Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of motor proficiency, (BOT-2). (1en ed) Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessment. P: 1:3.
3. Carley, M. (2010). The relationship between fundamental motor skill development and lifetime participation in physical activity. Psahperd, 9, 31–3.
4. Díaz T. Rojas J. and Morera M. (2015). Age and gender differences in fundamental motor skills (original version in English). Pensar en Movimiento: Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud, 13(2), 1–16.
5. Echmit R. and Li T. (1998). Motor learning. (R. Hemayat Tlab, R. Trans). Tehran: Dissemination of Science and Move. Pp. 1–79. (In Persian).
6. Farahani, M. T. (1994). Standardization graded Raven Intelligence Test (Form 2). Counseling and Research, Ministry of Education Department of Education. (In Persian).
7. Galahu, E. L., & Ozmoon. J. (2012). Understanding motor development in a lifetime. (Sh. Baram Ghadiri, Trans). (2en ed). Tehran: Nafe. Pp. 1–360. (In Persian).
8. Hernandez A. and Caçola P. (2015). Motor proficiency predicts cognitive ability in four-year-olds. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(4), 573–84.
9. Konter E. (2010). Nonverbal intelligence of soccer players according to their level of play. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1114–20.
10. Logan, S. W., Robinson, L. E., Wilson, A. E., & Lucas W. A. (2012). Getting the fundamentals of movement: A meta‐analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(3), 305–15.
11. Malina, M. Bouchard, C and Bar-Or, O. (2004). Growth, maturation, and physical activity. (B. Khalaji, H. Sabry & S. Lotfy, Trans). Tehran: Human Kinetics. p:1:150. (In Persian).
12. Milanifar, B. (2016). Psychology of exceptional children. (2en ed). Tehran: Ghomes Publication.p: 1:320. (In Persian).
13. Mohammadi Orangi, B. (2016). Survey relationship between motor proficiency with individual selected in healthy boys 10-14-year-old. (Unpublished master dissertation). University of Khwarizmi. (In Persian).
14. Nazarpour, Sh., Khalaj, H., & Mardani, F. (2012). The relationship between IQ, emotional intelligence and learning readiness with claws and volleyball. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12(5) 141-261. (In Persian).
15. Okely D, Booth T, and Patterson W. (2001). Relationship of physical activity to fundamental movement skills among adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33(11), 1899–1904.
16. Piek P, Jan P, Dawson L, Leigh M, and Gasson N. (2008). The role of early fine and gross motor development on later motor and cognitive ability. Human Movement Science, 27(5), 668–81.
17. Rahmani, J. (2006). Reliability, validity and standardization of Test Pyshrvnd Matrix of Advanced Trion Branch in Students. Research in Psychology, 14(34) 61–74. (In Persian).
18. Stodden D et al. )2008(. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest, 60(2), 290–306.
19. Wrotniak B et al. (2006). The relationship between motor proficiency and physical activity in children. Pediatrics, 118(6), e1758–65.
)