ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخۀ فارسی پرسش‌نامه تنظیم رفتار ورزشی

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 دانشیار دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

3 کارشناس ارشد دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، تعیین ویژگی­های روان­سنجی نسخۀ فارسی پرسش­نامة تنظیم رفتار ورزشی بود. در مجموع، 522 ورزشکار (223 مرد، 299 زن) با دامنۀ سنی 44-16 سال پرسش­نامه را تکمیل کردند. برای برآورد همسانی درونی امتیازات هر خرده‌مقیاس‌ از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد. پایایی زمانی سؤالات از روش آزمون- آزمون مجدد مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. برای بررسی روایی پرسش‌نامه از روش تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تأییدی استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش، نشان‌دهندۀ عدم برازش مطلوب مدل اولیۀ این مقیاس (24 سؤالی) بود. در ادامه، پس از حذف دو عامل، پایایی و روایی مقیاس تائید شد. در نتیجه، از نسخة فارسی پرسش­نامة تنظیم رفتار ورزشی (مدل تعدیل شدۀ 16 سؤالی) می­توان به عنوان یک ابزار مناسب برای ورزشکاران در جامعۀ ایرانی استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nassour Ahmadi 1
  • Behrooz Abdoli 2
  • Marziyeh Rezvani 3
1 Assistant Professor, Shahid Beheshti University
2 Associated Perofessor, Shahid Beheshti University
3 M.Sc. Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]

The aim of the present research was to determine the psychometric properties of the behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire (BRSQ).  In total, 522 athletes (223 men and 299 women) with age ranged 16-44 years old completed the questionnaire. It was used Cronbach's Alpha coefficient to estimate the internal consistency of scores from each subscale. The time reliability of this questionnaire was assessed by examining test- retest method. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the validity of this scale.The results indicate the lack of goodness of fit for initial model of this scale (24 items). Then, after removing two factors, analyses supported the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the questionnaire. In conclusion, the Persian version of the behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire (adjusted model of 16 items) can be used as an appropriate tool for athletes in the Iranian society.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Interjected Regulation
  • Identified Regulation
  • Integrated Regulation
  • Intrinsic motivation
  • Validity
  • Reliability

مراجع

  1. Ahmadi, M. N., M & Mokhtari, P. (2012). Perceived Motivational Climate, Basic Psychological Needs and Self Determined Motivation in Youth Male Athletes. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16(9), 1189-1195.
  2. Chan, D. K.-C., Hagger, M. S., & Spray, C. M. (2011). Treatment motivation for rehabilitation after a sport injury: Application of the trans-contextual model. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(2), 83-92. doi:
  3. Chatzisarantis, N., Hagger, M. S., Biddle, S. J., Smith, B., & Wang, J. C. (2003). A meta-analysis of perceived locus of causality in exercise, sport, and physical education contexts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25(3), 284-306.
  4. Daley, A. J., & Duda, J. L. (2006). Self-determination, stage of readiness to change for exercise, and frequency of physical activity in young people. European Journal of sport science, 6(4), 231-243.
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research, 3-33.
  6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior: Springer Science & Business Media.
  7. Hodge, K., & Lonsdale, C. (2011). Prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport: The role of coaching style, autonomous vs. controlled motivation, and moral disengagement. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 33(4), 527.
  8. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  9. Iraji N. I., Poursoltani Z. H., Vaghefi N. R. (2014). Determining of validity and reliability of Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology Studies, 6: 63-80.
  10. Li, F. (1999). The exercise motivation scale: Its multifaceted structure and construct validity. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 97-115.
  11. Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Rose, E. (2009). Athlete burnout in elite sport: A self-determination perspective. Journal of sports sciences, 27(8), 785-795.
  12. Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Rose, E. A. (2006). Pixels vs. paper: Comparing online and traditional survey methods in sport psychology. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 28(1), 100.
  13. Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Rose, E. A. (2008). The Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30(3), 323.
  14. Mallett, C., Kawabata, M., & Newcombe, P. (2007). Progressing measurement in sport motivation with the SMS-6: A response to Pelletier, Vallerand, and Sarrazin. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,8(5),622-631.
  15. Mallett, C., Kawabata, M., Newcombe, P., Otero-Forero, A., & Jackson, S. (2007). Sport motivation scale-6 (SMS-6): A revised six-factor sport motivation scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 600-614.
  16. Martin, J. J., & Cutler, K. (2002). An exploratory study of flow and motivation in theater actors. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(4), 344-352.
  17. McLachlan, S., Spray, C., & Hagger, M. S. (2011). The development of a scale measuring integrated regulation in exercise. British journal of health psychology, 16(4), 722-743.
  18. Moreno-Murcia, J., Marzo, J., Martínez-Galindo, C., & Conte Marín, L. (2011). Validation of psychological need satisfaction in exercise scale and the behavioural regulation in sport questionnaire to the Spanish context. RICYDE: Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 7(26), 355-369.
  19. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Briere, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35-35.
  20. Raedeke, T. D., & Smith, A. L. (2001). Development and preliminary validation of an athlete burnout measure. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology.
  21. Riemer, H., Fink, J.S., & Fitzgerald, M.P. (2002). External validity of the Sport MotivationScale. Avante, 8, 57–66.
  22. Shaw, K. L., Ostrow, A., & Beckstead, J. (2005). Motivation and the senior athlete: An examination of the psychometric properties of the Sport Motivation Scale. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 21(3), 206-214.
  23. Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 97.
  24. Standage, M., Duda, J.L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 97–110.
  25. Terry, P. C., Lane, A. M., & Fogarty, G. (2003). Construct validity of the Profile of Mood States-A for use with adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 125–139.
  26. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.
  27. Vlachopoulos, S. P., Katartzi, E. S., Kontou, M. G., Moustaka, F. C., & Goudas, M. (2011). The revised perceived locus of causality in physical education scale: Psychometric evaluation among youth. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(6), 583-592.

مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی
دوره 6، شماره 22
زمستان 1396
دی 1396
صفحه 31-46

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 08 شهریور 1394
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 11 آبان 1394
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 12 بهمن 1394

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار