نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران
2 گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران
3 گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف از این پژوهش، بررسی ویژگیهای روانسنجی نسخهً فارسی پرسشنامهً (فرا چشم‌انداز) چارچوب رابطه مربی- ورزشکار بود. جامعة آماری مورد نظر، شامل تمامی ورزشکاران مرد و زن حاضر در اردوهای تیم ملی بودند، که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری غیرتصادفی (هدفمند)، تعداد 217 ورزشکار بهعنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شدند. ابزار اندازهگیری مورد استفاده، پرسشنامۀ (فراچشمانداز) چارچوب ارتباط مربی – ورزشکار بود و از 14 سوال و چهار خرده مقیاس تشکیل میشد. برای تعیین روایی و محاسبه ضرایب اعتبار (از مدلهای آماری تحلیل عامل تأییدی و ضریب همبستگی پیرسون)، جهت محاسبة تجانس درونی (از آلفای کرانباخ و همچنین دو نیمه کردن آزمون)، جهت محاسبه ثبات پرسشنامه (از روش آزمون- بازآزمون) و جهت ارایه نُرم کمی (از میانگین، انحراف معیار، ارایه نُرم کیفی و نقاط برش با تأکید بر انحراف چارکی) استفاده و مشخص شد که این پرسشنامه دارای روایی، اعتبار و نُرم میباشد. با استفاده از مدل آماری ضریب همبستگی پیرسون مشخص گردید تمامی ضرایب اعتبار در ورزشکاران بالاتر از 64/0 است و پرسشنامه از ضریب روایی ملاکی (از نوع همزمان) بالایی برخوردار است. در پایان ضمن تایید و استانداردسازی پرسشنامه، چهار عامل (نزدیکی و صمیمیت، تعهد، متمم/مکمل و رضایتمندی) استخراج گردید. به منظور ارائة یافتههای تکمیلی، از الگویابی معادلات ساختاری استفاده و مشاهده شد، پرسشنامه حاضر دارای برازش بوده و در نهایت مدل مستخرج شده از این پژوهش و بر مبنای چهار عامل بدست آمد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Meta-Perspective (3+1Cs) Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q)
نویسندگان [English]
- Amirreza Balzadeh 1
- Reza Nikbakhsh 2
- Farshad Tojari 3
1 ph.D student of sport management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 department of sport management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, center Tehran, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
This research was intended to study the psychometric specifications of Persian version of the questionnaire (hyper perspective) in the coach-athlete relationship. The statistical society consisted of all the male and female athletes who were present in the national team camp, and 217 athletes were selected via random (targeted) sampling method. The measurement method exploited was the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (Meta-Perspective) which included 14 questions and 4 subscales. In order to test the hypotheses of the study, to determine justifiability and calculate credit factors (the statistical models of Confirmatory factor analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient analysis), to calculate the internal congruence (Cronbach’s alpha method and halving the experiment), to calculate the reliability of the questionnaire (the test-retest method) and to provide quantitative norm (mean, standard deviation, qualitative norm and quarter deviation based section points) were exploited to show that the questionnaire possesses justifiability, validity and norm. Using the statistical model of Pearson correlation coefficients determines the entire credit factors above 0.64 in the athletes and the questionnaire is of high criterion validity (simultaneous). Eventually, besides confirmation and standardization of the questionnaire, four factors (closeness, commitment, complementarity, satisfaction) were extracted. To provide the supplementary results, patterning of the structural equations was exploited and the observation was that the current questionnaire includes fitness and finally the model based on these four factors extracted from the study was obtained.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- : Psychometrics
- Closeness
- Commitment
- Complementarity
- Satisfaction
2. Balduck, A,L ., Jowett, S. (2010). Sychometric Properties of the Belgian coach version of the Belgian(Dutch)athlete version of the coach version of the Coach–Athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q) . International Journal of Sport Psychology, 42(2),204-226.
3. Balduck, A ,L.,Jowett.,and Buelens,M. (2011). Factorial and predictive validity of the Coach–Athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q). Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sport, 20(5), 779-786.
4. -Balzadeh, A, R., Tojari, F.,and Kamkari, K. (2011). Standardization of Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q). Journal of Olympic, 55(3), 119-131. In Persian.
5. Jowett, S. (2006). Interpersonal and structural features of Greek coach-athlete dyads performing in individual sports. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 69–81.
6. Jowett, S. (2007). Interdependence analysis and the 3 + 1Cs in the coach- athlete relationship. In S. Jowett & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 15–27). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
7. Jowett, S. (2007). Factor structure and criterion validity of the meta-perspective version of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q). Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice.
8. Jowett, S. (2008a). Moderators and mediators of the association between the coach-athlete relationship and physical self-concept. International Journal of Coaching Science, 2, 43–62.
9. Jowett, S. (2008b). Outgrowing the “familial” coach-athlete relationship. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 39, 20–40.
10. Jowett, S. (2009). Validating coach-athlete relationship measures with the homological network. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 13, 1e18.
11. Jowett, S., & Nezlek, J. (2012). Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach-athlete dyads.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(3), 287-30.
12. - Jowett, S., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART – Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 14, 245–257.
13. Jowett, S., & Poczwardowski, A. (2007). Understanding the coach-athlete relationship. In S. Jowett & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 3–14). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
14. Jowett, S., Timson-Katchis, M. and Adams, R. (2007). Too close for comfort? Dependence in the dual role of parent/coach–child/athlete relationship. International Journal of Coaching.
15. Lafrenière, M.-A. K., Jowett, S., Vallerand, R. J., Donahue, E.G., and Lorimer, R. (2008). Passion in Sport: on the quality of the coach-athlete relationship. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30(5), 451-560.
16. Lafrenière, M.-A. K., Jowett, S., Vallerand, R. J., & Carbonnea, N. (2011) Passion for coaching and quality of the coach-athlete relationship:The mediating role of coaching behaviors. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 12(2), 144-152.
17. Lavoi, N. M. (2007). Interpersonal communication & conflict in the coach–athlete relationship. In S. Jowett and D. Lavallee (Eds), Social psychology in sport (pp. 29–40). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Science, 1, 59–78.
18. - Lorimer, R., & Jowett, S. (2009a). Empathic accuracy, meta-perspective, and satisfaction in the coach-athlete relationship. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, 201e212.
19. - Lorimer, R., & Jowett, S. (2009b). Empathic Accuracy, Meta-Perspective, and Satisfaction in the Coach-Athlete relationship. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21(2), 201-212.
20. Lorimer, R., & Jowett, S. (2010). Feedback of information in empathic accuracy of sport coaches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,11(1), 12-17.
21. Philippe, R. A., &Seiler, R. (2006). Closeness, co-orientation and complementarity in coach-athlete relationship: what swimmers say about their male coaches? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(2), 159-171.
22. -Philippe, R., Sagar, S. S., Huguet, S., paquet, Y., and Jowett, S. (2011). From teacher to friend: The evolving nature of the coach-athlete relationship. International Journal of sport Psychology, 42(1), 1-23.
23. Rhind, D. J. A., & Jowett, S.(2010a). Initial evidence for the criterion-related and structural validity of the long versions of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire. European Journal of Sport science,10(6),359-370.
24. Rhind, D. J. A., & Jowett, S.(2010b). Relationship Maintenance Strategies in the Coach-Athlete Relationship:The development of the COMPASS MODEL. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22(1), 106-121.
25. Rhind, D. J. A., & Jowett, S.(2011a). Linking maintenance Strategies to the quality of coach-athlete relationship. Journal of Sport Psychology, 42(1), 55-68.
26. Rhind, D. J. A., & Jowett, S.(2011b). Working with coach-athlete relationship: their quality and maintenance. Professional practice in Sport Psychology: A review, 219-248.
27. Rhind, D. J. A., & Jowett, S. (2012). Development of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Maintenance Questionnaire (CARM-Q). International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching,7(1), 121-138.
28. Yang, X. Y., & Jowett, S. (2013a). The Psychometric properties of the Short and Long Versions of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire. measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 17(4), 281-294.
29. - Yang, X. Y., & Jowett, S. (2013b). Coceptual and measurement issues of
)