نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری ،گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی ، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، قزوین ،ایران

2 استادیار ،گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی ، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، قزوین ،ایران

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر ارائة مدل مؤلفه ­های روان ­شناختی مؤثر بر مشارکت جانبازان و معلولین در فعالیتهای ورزشی بود. این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی، از نظر شیوه گردآوری داده­ ها توصیفی-پیمایشی بود. در بخش اول (کیفی) برای انجام مصاحبة میدانی، جامعة آماری پژوهش را اساتید دانشگاهی آگاه به مسئلة ورزش معلولین و جانبازان، برخی مدیران حوزة ورزش معلولین (فدراسیون ورزش ­های جانبازان و معلولین) و همچنین ورزشکاران معلول و جانباز تشکیل دادند. این افراد، به صورت هدفمند برای مصاحبه‌های کیفی در موضوع پژوهش انتخاب شدند (12 مصاحبه با 12 نفر و تا حد اشباع نظری ادامه یافت). در بخش دوم (کمی)بعد از گردآوری اطلاعات حاصل از پژوهش کیفی، اقدام به ساخت پرسش­نامة مؤلفه ­های روان ­شناخی مؤثر بر مشارکت معلولین و جانبازان در فعالیتهای ورزشی شد. این پرسشنامه (18 گویه و در قالب 3 مؤلفه) بین معلولین ورزشکار (386 نفر) توزیع گردید. روایی و پایایی هر دو ابزار اندازه ­گیری (مصاحبه و پرسشنامه) مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. برای بررسی و پاسخ به سؤالات پژوهش و رسم و تدوین مدل اندازه­ گیری و مدل ساختاری از نرم ­افزارهای اس ­پی ­اس ­اس نسخة 24،  پی­ ال ­اس نسخة 2.0 و نرم افزار مکس ­کیوآی­ دی­ نسخة پرو استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان داد 18 کد مفهومی و 3 مقولة اصلی، از مؤلفه ­های روان­ شناختی مؤثر بر مشارکت معلولین در فعالیتهای ورزشی بودند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Model of Psychological Components Affecting the Participation of Veterans and Disabled in Sport Activities

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Kiyal 1
  • Mehdi Naderinasab 2
  • Nima Majedi 2

1 Ph.D. student of sports management Azad University of Qazvin

2 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Azad University of Qazvin

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to Presenting the Model of Psychological Components Affecting the Participation of Veterans and Disabled in Sport Activities. The present research in terms of purpose is applied and In terms of data collection method is Descriptive-survey. In the first part (qualitative) for conducting field interviews, the statistical community of the study consisted of academics Professors aware of the issue of disabled sports, some of the managers of the sports field of the disabled (Veterans and Disabled Sports Federation), as well as disabled and veteran athletes, Objectives were selected for qualitative interviews on the topic of research (12 interviews with 12 people and continued to theoretical saturation). In the second part (quantitatively), after collecting the data from the qualitative research, a questionnaire on social-cultural components affecting the participation of the disabled in physical activity was performed and this questionnaire (18 items in the form of 3 components) among the athlete's Veterans and Disabled (386 people) were distributed. The validity and reliability of both measuring instruments (interview and questionnaire) were confirmed. The elongation and skidding indices are used to investigate the distribution of data (normal or abnormal) and to investigate and answer the research questions, compilation of the model and structural model of SPSS software version 24, Smart PLS Version 2.0 and Pro Max QDA Pro version were used. The results of this study showed that 18 conceptual codes and 3 main categories are the psychological components that affect the participation of disabled people in sport activities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Personality Traits
  • Individual Motivations
  • Psychological Skills
  • Disabled Sport

1. Brown, C., & Pappous, A. (Sakis). (2018). “The Legacy Element. It Just Felt More Woolly”: Exploring the Reasons for the Decline in People With Disabilities’ Sport Participation in England 5 Years After the London 2012 Paralympic Games. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 42(5), 112-131.
2. Burns, J. (2012). Falling through the rabbit hole: Elite sports and people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Critical Psychology Counselling and Psychotherapy, 11(1), 56–63
3. Ferez, S., Ruffié, S., & Héas, S. (2017). Sports and “minorities”: Negotiating the Olympic model, sport, ethics and philosophy. Ingland: Taylor & Francis (Routledge).
4. Gérard, S. (2016). The paralympic movement from 1944 to 2016: a processual analysis of institutional creation, maintenance and change. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de la motricité. Louvain-La-Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain, 12.
5. Ghodratnama, A. Heydarinejad, S. (2013). The relationship between the motivation of sport participation and the physical activity of students in Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. sports management studies, 5(18), 189-202. (In Persian)
6. Giraldo-Rodríguez, L., Mino-León, D., Murillo-González, J. C., & Agudelo-Botero, M. (2019). Factors associated with environmental barriers of people with disabilities in Mexico. Revista de Saúde Pública, 53(27), 1-32.
7. Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N.L.D. (2011). Causality orientations moderate the undermining effect of rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 485-489.
8. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.
9. Holland, M. J. G., Woodcock, C., Cumming, J., & Duda J. L. (2010). Important mental qualities and employed mental techniques: the perspective of young elite team sport athletes. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 4, 19–38.
10. International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education. (2015). Different. Just like you: A psychological approach promoting the inclusion of persons with disabilities. Berlin, Germany: Author.
11. Jalali Farahani, M. (2008). Leisure and recreational management. Tehran: Tehran University Press. (In Persian).
12. Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.
13. Jõesaar, H., Hein, V., Hagger, M.S. (2011). Peer influence on young athletes’ need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and persistence in sport: A 12-month prospective study, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12, 500-508.
14. Kajbafnejad, H. Ahai, H. Heydari, A. Asgari, P. Enayati, M. (2009). Relationship between psychosocial skills, emotional intelligence and its components with the motivation for sport success in male athletes in Shiraz. (New Findings in Psychology (Social Psychology), 5(13), 107-125. (In Persian).
15. Kung, S. P., & Taylor, P. (2014). The use of public sports facilities by the disabled in England. Sport Management Review, 17(1), 8–22.
16. Lantz, E., & Marcellini, A. (2018). Sport games for people with intellectual disabilities. Institutional analysis of an unusual international configuration. Sport in Society, 21(4), 635–648.
17. Marcellini, A. (2018). The extraordinary development of sport for people with dis/abilities. What does it all mean? Alter, 12(2), 94–104.
18. Mc.Donald, D. J. (2010). The role of enjoyment, motivational climate, and coach training in promoting the positive development of young athletes, a thesis submitted to the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 88-93.
19. Najah, A., & Benrejeb, R. (2016). Psychological characteristics of male youth soccer players: Specificity of mental attributes according to age categories. Advances in Physical Education, 6, 19-26.
20. Piatt, J., Kang, S., Wells, M. S., Nagata, S., Hoffman, J., & Taylor, J. (2018). Changing identity through sport: The Paralympic sport club experience among adolescents with mobility impairments. Disability and Health Journal, 11(2), 262–266.
21. Rezaean, A. (2016). Basics of Organizational Behavior Management. Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of Human Sciences Books of Universities. (In Persian)
22. Sheltz. D. (2019). Theories of personality. 10th ed. Translated by: Mohammadi, Y. S. (2020). 3. Tehran. Press: Publishing Edition. (In Persian).
23. Shapiro DR, Martin JJ. (2014).The relationships among sport self-perceptions and social well-being in athletes with physical disabilities. Disabil Health J. 7(1), 42-48.
24. Sobhani, A. Andam, R. ZArifi, M. (2015). Investigating and Prioritizing the Effective Factors and Obstacles in Sports Participation in Disabled People in Ahwaz. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 2(6), 41-48. (In Persian).
25. vereceer, A., richter, m., carine, A., (2009). “The role of behavioral factors in in explaning socio- economicdifferences in adolescent health: A multilevel study in 33 countries”, Journal of social science & medicine, 69, (3), 396 – 403.
26. Villoing, G., Perera, E., & Le Roux, N. (2018). The institutionalization of off-road wheelchair riding in France (1990–2015): “Truly a sport of sharing and diversity”. Sport in Society, 21(4), 664–677.
27. Warner, S. (2018). Sport as medicine: How F3 is building healthier men and communities. Sport Management Review, 22(1), 38-52.