نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل
نویسندگان
1 دکتری رفتار حرکتی، گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران
2 استادیار گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
3 دانشجوی دکتری فیزیولوژی ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر طراحی و روان‌سنجی پرسش‌نامۀ خود‌گزارشی انگیزش حرکتی در کودکان 9 الی 12 ساله بود. طراحی پرسش‌نامه با استفاده از روش چهار مرحله‌ایی والتز انجام شد. برای بررسی این مراحل،656 کودک 9 الی 12 ساله به صورت تصادفی خوشه‌ای از مدارس شهر خرم‌آباد انتخاب شدند و در مطالعه شرکت کردند. 24 گویۀ اولیه، بر اساس مروری بر مطالعات منطبق با نظریه‌های انگیزشی استخراج گردید. ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی پرسش‌نامه با بهره‌گیری از روایی صوری، محتوا و سازه بررسی شد. پس از تعیین روایی صوری و محتوا به صورت کمی و کیفی، 6 گویه حذف و 18 گویه برای ارزیابی در مراحل بعدی حفظ شدند. در ادامه، نتایج تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی، تعداد گویه‌های پرسش‌نامه (18گویه) را حفظ و آنها را در قالب سه عامل فعالیت، انگیزش و سازگاری دسته‌بندی نمود. لذا، پرسش‌نامۀ 18 سؤالی انگیزش‌حرکتی برای کودکان 9 الی 12 ساله مناسب و از قابلیت به کار‌گیری در موقعیت‌های مختلف توسط والدین، مربیان، پرستاران و کاردرمانان برخوردار است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Designing and Psychometric Properties Movement Motivation Self-Report Questioner in 9 to 12 Years Old Children
نویسندگان [English]
- shahram nazarpouri 1
- farhad ghadiri 2
- Fateme shiravand 3
1 . PhD at Motor Behavior, Department of Physical Education, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD student at sports physiology, Kharazmi Faculty of Physical Education, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this study was to design of the children movement motivation self-report questioner in 9 to 12 years old children. The questionnaire was design using Waltz's four-step method. To examine these stages, 656 children were randomly cluster selected from khoram-abad city schools and Participated in the study. Items 24 of the questionnaire were identifying from the review of the studies based on theory of motivation. The psychometric properties of the instrument such as face, content and construct validity were determined. After determining face and content validity using qualitative and quantitative methods, six items were delete and 18 items were retaining for evaluation at a later stage. The result of exploratory factor analysis the number of questionnaires' items (18 items) categorized as three factor of activity, motivation and adaptation. Therefore, children’s movement motivation 18 items questioner is appropriate and feasibility in different situations by parents, trainers, nurses and occupational therapists
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Movement Motivation
- Children
- Psychometric
2. Abdoli B. (2010). Psychosocial Basics of Physical Education and Exercise. Third edition. Tehran: Bam dad Book Publishing. In Persian
3. Atun-Einy, O., Berger, S. E., & Scher, A. (2013). Assessing motivation to move and its relationship to motor development in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 36(3), 457-469.
4. Berger, S. E., Adolph, K. E., & Lobo, S. A. (2005). Out of the toolbox: Toddlers differentiate wobbly and wooden handrails. Child development, 76(6), 1294-1307.
5. Bardid, F., De Meester, A., Tallir, I., Cardon, G., Lenoir, M., & Haerens, L. (2016). Configurations of actual and perceived motor competence among children: Associations with motivation for sports and global self-worth. Human movement science, 50, 1-9.
6. Carey, W. B., & McDevitt, S. C. (1978). Revision of the infant temperament questionnaire. Pediatrics, 61(5), 735-739.
7. Doralp, S., & Bartlett, D. (2014). Infant Movement Motivation Questionnaire: Development of a measure evaluating infant characteristics relating to motor development in the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 37(3), 326-333.
8. Goodway JD, Ozmun JC, Gallahue DL. Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2019 Oct 15.
9. Khalaji H. (2004). The investigation relationship between anthropometric characteristics and motor performance in children 6 to 8 years' experience and no experience in the arak city: Motor Behavior Journal. 4(3), 18-30. In Persian.
10. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. London, Guilford publications.
11. Matarma, T., Lagström, H., Hurme, S., Tammelin, T. H., Kulmala, J., Barnett, L. M., & Koski, P. (2018). Motor skills in association with physical activity, sedentary time, body fat, and day care attendance in 5‐6‐year‐old children—The STEPS Study. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 28(12), 2668-2676.
12. Meyns, P., Roman de Mettelinge, T., van der Spank, J., Coussens, M., & Van Waelvelde, H. (2018). Motivation in pediatric motor rehabilitation: A systematic search of the literature using the self-determination theory as a conceptual framework. Developmental neurorehabilitation, 21(6), 371-390.
13. Morgan, G. A., Busch-Rossnagel, N. A., Barrett, K. C., & Wang, J. (2014). The Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire (DMQ 17): New York. A Manual about Its Development, Psychometrics, and Use.
14. Newell, A. (1992). SOAR as a unified theory of cognition: Issues and explanations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(3), 464-492.
15. Nazarpouri, S., Bahram, A., & Gadiri, F. (2018). Children Movement Motivation Questioner; Design and Psychometrically Evaluation within the Age Range of 3 to 6 years old. Iranian Journal of Pediatric Nursing (JPEN). In Persian
16. Payne, V. G., & Isaacs, L. D. (2012). Human motor development: A lifespan approach. New York. Routledge.
17. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods. New York. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
18. Thelen, E., Kelso, J. S., & Fogel, A. (1987). Self-organizing systems and infant motor development. Developmental Review, 7(1), 39-65.
19. Thelen, E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15(2), 255-283. The International Journal of Relational Perspectives. Volume 15, 2005 - Issue 2 doi.org/10.1080/10481881509348831.
20. Trettien, A. W. (1900). Creeping and walking. The American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 1 (Oct., 1900), pp. 1-57 (57 pages). Published by: University of Illinois Press
21. Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. J. (2015). Research methods in physical activity. Human kinetics.
22. Whitehead, M. (Ed.). (2010). Physical literacy: Throughout the lifecourse. New York. Routledge.
23. Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (Eds.). (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research. New York, Springer publishing company.
24. Von Hofsten, C. (2007). Action in development. Developmental science, 10(1), 54-60. Sweden. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00564.x.
25. Von Hofsten, C. (2004). An action perspective on motor development. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(6), 266-272.
26. Zeitlin, S., Szczepanski, M., & Williamson, G. G. (1988). Early coping inventory. Scholastic testing service. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60(3), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079183.
)