نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه روان شناسی ورزشی پژوهشگاه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران
2 گروه تربیت بدنی دانشگاه بین االملی امام خمینی
3 دکتری روانشناسی ورزشی، گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه غیر انتفاعی کوشیار گیلان، ایران
چکیده
امروزه استفاده از مواد نیروافزا به دلایل مختلفی توسط ورزشکاران رو به افزایش است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی نگرش ضمنی و آشکار دانشجویان زن ایرانی ورزشکار نسبت به داروهای دوپینگی و مکمل بود. برای این منظور 200 دانشجوی ورزشکار دختر داوطلب در این آزمون شرکت کردند. برای بررسی نگرش دانشجویان از ابزار آزمون تصاویر مبتنی بر دوپینگ استفاده شد. نتایج نشان دهنده نگرش منفی نسبت به مواد دوپینگی (52±99/11-) و نگرش مثبت نسبت به مکمل‌های ورزشی (29±56/1) در هر دو نگرش (ضمنی و آشکار) است. همچنین نتایج آزمون تی مستقل نشان داد بین نگرش ضمنی و آشکار دانشجویان به دوپینگ اختلاف معناداری وجود دارد اما اختلافی در نگرش نسبت به مکمل‌های غذایی مجاز دیده نشد. به نظر می‌رسد با برنامه‌های آموزشی مبتنی بر کنترل و پیشگیری دوپینگ با متد ارزیابی غیرمستقیم نگرش و تفکر ورزشکاران می‌توان از پیامدهای ناگوار دوپینگ پیشگیری نمود
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Implicit and Explicit Attitudes of Iranian Student-Athletes Towards Doping Drugs and Supplements
نویسندگان [English]
- Alireza Aaghababa 1
- Maghsoud Nabilpour 2
- Afrooz Mosavi 3
1 faculty member
2 Department of Physical Education, Imam Khomeini International University
3 faculty member
چکیده [English]
Nowadays, the use of neuro- enhancements materials by athletes for various reasons is increasing. The present study aimed to investigate the implicit and explicit attitude of female Iranian athletes towards doping and supplementary drugs. For this purpose, 200 voluntary female student-athletes participated in this research. Doping-based image testing tools (BIAT) were used to find out students' attitudes. The results show a negative attitude towards doping substances (-11.99±52) and a positive attitude towards sports supplements (1.56± 29) in both attitudes (implicit and explicit). Also, independent t-test results showed that there was a significant difference between students' implicit and explicit attitudes toward doping, but there was no significant difference in attitudes toward legal dietary supplements. It seems that with training programs based on doping control and prevention with the method of indirect evaluation of athletes' attitudes the prevention of doping negative consequences could be more effective
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Implicit Attitude
- Explicit Attitude
- Doping
- Supplement
2. Allen, J., Taylor, J., Dimeo, P., Dixon, S., & Robinson, L. (2015). Predicting elite Scottish athletes’ attitudes towards doping: examining the contribution of achievement goals and motivational climate. Journal of sports sciences, 33(9), 899-906.
3. Amirsasan, R., Nabilpour, M., Pourraze, H., & Curby, D. (2018). Effect of 8-week resistance training with creatine supplementation on body composition and physical fitness indexes in male futsal players. International journal of Sport Studies for Health, 1(3).
4. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(11), 417-423.
5. Banaji, M. R., & Heiphetz, L. (2010). Attitudes.
6. Bassoli, L., Boncinelli, S., Brizzi, L., Curci, R., Signorelli, D., Pazardjiklian, I., & Pellai, A. (2004). Survey of physical activity and doping in a sample of 6,915 students aged 14-18 years. Minerva pediatrica, 56(3), 317-326.
7. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current directions in psychological science, 16(6), 351-355.
8. Blank, C., Brunner, J., Kreische, B., Lazzeri, M., Schobersberger, W., & Kopp, M. (2017). Performance-enhancing substance use in university students: motives, attitudes, and differences in normative beliefs. Journal of Substance Use, 22(3), 324-330.
9. Bondarev, D. (2007). Doping Prevalence Among University Students In Ukraine: A Study Of Knowledge, Attitudes And Behavior. In: Sebastopol National Technical University.
10. Brand, R., Heck, P., & Ziegler, M. (2014). Illegal performance enhancing drugs and doping in sport: a picture-based brief implicit association test for measuring athletes’ attitudes. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 9(1), 7.
11. Brand, R., Melzer, M., & Hagemann, N. (2011). Towards an implicit association test (IAT) for measuring doping attitudes in sports. Data-based recommendations developed from two recently published tests. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(3), 250-256.
12. Collins, D., MacNamara, A., Collins, R., & Bailey, R. (2012). Why ahletes say no to doping? Examining the reasons underpinning athletes' decision not to dope.
13. Engelberg, T., Moston, S., & Blank, C. (2019). Coaches’ awareness of doping practices and knowledge about anti-doping control systems in elite sport. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 26(1), 97-103.
14. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes: Harcourt brace Jovanovich college publishers.
15. Fung, L., & Yuan, Y. (2006). Performance enhancement drugs: knowledge, attitude, and intended behavior among community coaches in Hong Kong. The Sport Journal, 9(3(.
16. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological review, 102(1), 4.
17. Hurst, P., Kavussanu, M., Boardley, I., & Ring, C. (2019). Sport supplement use predicts doping attitudes and likelihood via sport supplement beliefs. Journal of sports sciences, 37(15), 1734-1740.
18. Kamenju, W. J. (2014). Influence of Sports Disciplines and Demographics of Kenya’s Colleges Athletes on their Awareness, Perception and Attitude to Performance-Enhancing Substances Use. Kenyatta University,
19. Kaur, J., Masaun, M., & Bhatia, M. (2014). Performance Enhancing Drug Abuse in Athletes and Role of Physiotherapy. Delhi Psychiatry Journal, 17(2), 413-418.
20. Kim, T., & Kim, Y. H. (2017). Korean national athletes’ knowledge, practices, and attitudes of doping: a cross-sectional study. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 12(1), 7.
21. Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., Rodafinos, A., & Tzorbatzoudis, H. (2010). Predictors of doping intentions in elite-level athletes: a social cognition approach. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(5), 694-710.
22. Lipschitz, J. M., Yusufov, M., Paiva, A., Redding, C. A., Rossi, J. S., Johnson, S.. .Prochaska, J. O. (2015). Transtheoretical principles and processes for adopting physical activity: A longitudinal 24-month comparison of maintainers, relapsers, and nonchangers. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 37(6), 592-606.
23. Lucidi, F., Grano, C., Leone, L., Lombardo, C., & Pesce, C. (2004). Determinants of the intention to use doping substances: an empirical contribution in a sample of Italian adolescents. International journal of sport psychology.
24. Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y., Barkoukis, V., & Backhouse, S. (2014). Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 44(11), 1603-1624.
25. Palacios, N. (2008). Consenso sobre bebidas para el deportista. Composición y pautas de reposición de líquidos. Arch Med Deporte, 126(25), 245-258.
26. Peters Jr, R. J., Adams, L. F., Barnes, J. B., Hines, L. A., Jones, D. E., Krebs, K. M., & Kelder, S. H. (2005). Beliefs and social norms about ephedra onset and perceived addiction among college male and female athletes. Substance use & misuse, 40(1), 125-135.
27. Petróczi, A., Aidman, E. V., & Nepusz, T. (2008). Capturing doping attitudes by self-report declarations and implicit assessment: A methodology study. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 3(1), 9.
28. Petróczi, A., Backhouse, S. H., Barkoukis, V., Brand, R., Elbe, A.-M., Lazuras, L., & Lucidi, F. (2015). A call for policy guidance on psychometric testing in doping control in sport. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26(11), 1130-1139.
29. Jahani, M., Nabilpour, M., & Campillo, R. R. (2019). Effects of L-arginine supplementation and aerobic training on hemodynamic indices of obese men. Int J Sport Stud Health, 2, 1-7.
30. Sertbas, K., Akdeniz, H., Yilmaz, A., Çalik, F., & Sentürk, U. (2015). Evaluation of ergogenic matter and doping usage knowledge of Turkish national athletes. Medicina Sportiva: Journal of Romanian Sports Medicine Society, 11(3), 2591.
31. Shahbazi, M., Choobineh, s., & Ezzati, r. (2020). Psychological Pathology and Prevalence Sports Supplements among Female Athletes. Sport Psychology Studies, 8(30), 57-76. doi:10.22089/spsyj.2019.7350.1784 In Persian.
32. Skarberg, K., & Engstrom, I. (2007). Troubled social background of male anabolic-androgenic steroid abusers in treatment. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2(1), 20.
33. Soltanabadi, S., Tojari, F., & Manouchehri, J. (2014). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments of doping attitudes and doping behavior in Iranian professional athletes of team sports. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4(4), 280-286.
34. Tavares, A. S., Serpa, S., Horta, L., & Rosado, A. (2019). Psychosocial factors and performance enhancing substances in gym users: A systematic review. Revista de psicología del deporte, 28(1), 131-142.
)