نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران

2 دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه الزهرا تهران

3 گروه رفتار حرکتی، گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزش، دانشگاه یزد

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی جامعه‌شناختی تجردگرایی در ورزشکاران مرد عضو تیم‌های ملی طراحی و اجرا شد. در مدل نظری پژوهش از دیدگاه‌های مدرنیزاسیون ویلیام گود، کارکردگرایی ساختاری پارسنز، کارکردگرایی دورکیم، تئوری گزینش معقولانۀ هک‌تر، نوگرایی آنتونی گیدنز و فردگرایی دو توکویل استفاده شده است.جامعۀ آماری این پژوهش، جامعۀ ورزشی مجرد عضو تیم‌های ملی در سال ۱۳۹۶ است.با استفاده از روش انتخاب در دسترس، 156 نفر از این افراد شناسایی و به ‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. نتایج آزمون پیرسون نشان می‌دهد بین متغیرهای فردگرایی، سبک زندگی سنتی، سبک زندگی مدرن، باورهای مذهبی، بی‌اعتمادی اجتماعی، هراس از احساس شکست در ازدواج، تجربۀ ازدواج ناموفق در میان خویشاوندان و هزینه‌های اقتصادی-مالی با تجردگرایی رابطۀ معنا‌داری وجود دارد و متغیر عملکرد رسانۀ جمعی فاقد ارتباط معنا‌دار است. در مجموع، متغیرهای پژوهش توانایی تبیین تجردگرایی در بین ورزشکاران را داشتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Sociology of Celibacy in Male Athletes of National Teams

نویسندگان [English]

  • Vahid Shojaei 1
  • fatemeh najafian 2
  • hossein samadi 3

1 Department of Physical Education, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

2 faculty of physical activity. alzahra university

3 Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Yazd University,

چکیده [English]

The present study was designed and implemented to sociologically identify the celibacy in male athletes of national teams. Modernization perspective by William Good, Parsons' structural functionalism, Durkheim's functionalism, hackers' rational choice theory, Anthony Giddens's modernization, and Two-Tocqueville individualism were all used in the theoretical model of the research. The statistical population of this study included the national single-member sports teams in 2017. Using the availability sampling method, 156 individuals were identified and selected as samples. Pearson test results showed that there was a significant relationship between variables of celibacy, traditional lifestyle, modern lifestyle, religious beliefs, social distrust, fear of failure in marriage, unsuccessful marriage experiences among relatives, and financial-economic costs with materiality. No significant relationship was found with respect to the mass media. In general, the research variables were able to explain celibacy among the athletes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Celibacy
  • Individualism
  • Traditional and Modern Lifestyle
  • Sports
1. Azad, T. and Maleki, A. (2007). Analysis of traditional and modern values at micro and macro levels. Social Science Letter, 30,. 121-96. In Persian.
2. Boden, R. (1994). Social mobility, translation of the believer of the tile. Gonabad: Marand.
3. Bohrani, M. (2013). Analysis of marital and divorce statistics of Iranian couples over the past five decades. Population Quarterly, 20, 43-56. In Persian.
4. Casey E. Copen, Ph.D. Kimberly Daniels, Jonathan Vaspa, and William D. Mosher (2012).First Marriages in the United States: Data From the 2006 – 2010 National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Reports, 49, 1- 23.
5. Delkhamosh, M. (2013). Iranian youth's feedback on marriage: the findings of a national survey. the evolutionary psychology of Iranian psychologists, 9(36), 320-331. In Persian.
6. Ezazi, Sh. (2001). Family Sociology, Tehran: Roshangaran Publications and Women's Studies. In Persian.
7. Elgot, Jessica (2015). The guardian, marriage problems, New York: Guardian Publishing.
8. Eskandary, A. (2008). A Survey on Social Factors Affecting the Late Marriage Age in Iran with Emphasis on Golestan Province. Quarterly Journal of Sociology of Azad University of Ashtian, 4(3), 89-123.
9. Fields, J. and L. M. Casper (2001). America s Families and Living Arrangements, Washington: Census Burea.
10. Forotan, Y. (2013). Challenges of Contemporary Family and Modernism with an Emphasis on Divorce in the Demographic Transition Process. Social Issues of Iran, 4(2), 105-129.
11. Getabi, K. & Ghafari, Gh. (2009). Causes of increasing the age of marriage for girls, Women in Development and Politics, 9 (1), 7-34. In Persian.
12. Gillis, J. R. (2004). Marriages of the mind. Journal of marriage and family, 66(4), 988-991.‏
13. Gomes, C (2006). Social Development and Family Changes. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
14. Grossbard, Sh (2007). The Economics of Marriage, Abingdon: Routledge
15. HezarJeribi, J., Astin Feshan, P. (2005). Socio-economic factors affecting the average age of women's marriage in the past three decades (1355-1385.. Journal of Social Welfare and Development Planning, 3(6), 17-33.
16. Hoseynzadeh, R. (2008). Effective Sociological Factors on Marriage Delay in Garmsar County, Master's Degree in Sociology, Garmsar Azad University. In Persian.
17. Iman, M., Sorosh, M. (2013). Comparison of the Intergenerational Economic, Social and Cultural Capacities Available to Women of Shiraz. Women in Development and Politics, 4, 509-530.
18. Kazemi poor, Sh. (2005). The evolution of the marriage age in Iran and the demographic factors affecting it. Women's Research, 3, 19-33.
19. Majodin, A., Jamali, A. (2007). Study of the Causes and Effects of Increasing the Age of Marriage of Rural Girls in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Sociology of Azad University, Ashtian, 2(4), 50-77.
20. Mahmodian, H. (2004). The Age of Marriage Rising: A Survey of Supportive Factors. Social Science Letter, 24, 27-53.
21. Maghsodi, M. (2007). Family and Kinship Anthropology, Tehran, Iran.
22. Matouschek, Niko; Rasul, Imran (2008). the Economics of the Marriage Contract: Theories and Evidence. Journal of Law and Economics, 51, 59-110.
23. Mirzai, M., and Ghorbani, F. (2016). Orientation of Materialistic-Trans-Radicalist Value and Marriage Scheduling (Case Study: Men and Women in the Marriage Shape of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Provinces), Journal of the Demographic Association, 10 (20), 50-71. In Persian.
24. Moghadas, M., Yaghobi, A. (2006). Changes, Characteristics and Obstacles to Marriage in Guilan Province with an Emphasis on the City of Rasht. Iranian Society for Demographic Studies, 110-289.
25. Ojaghlo, S., and Sarai, H. (2013). Study of time changes in the value of children in Iran (study of women in Zanjan), Quarterly Journal of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 3 (2), 261-283. In Persian.
26. Popenoe, D. (2009). Cohabitation, Marriage, and Child Wellbeing: A Cross- National Perspective, SOCIAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY. Society 46(5):429-436 .
27. Rowland, D. T. (2007). Historical Trends in Childlessness. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1311- 1337.
28. Rubio, G. (2014). How Love Conquered Marriage: Theory and Evidence on the Disappearance of Arranged Marriages, Master's Degree in Sociology, University of California, Merced.
29. Sadeghi, S., Erfanmanesh, I. (2013). Sociological Analysis of the Effects of Modernization on the Iranian Family and the Need for the Formulation of an Iranian Islamic Model. Women in Culture and Arts, Round 5 (1), 63-84.
30. Sadeghi, R. (2007). A Study of Marriage Issues and Validation in a Solution. Women's Research, 83-108.
31. Sedigh Oreei, Gh. (2008).Imam Khomeini; motherhood and upbringing, the first job of women, Peyvand, 308, 1-9. In Persian.
32. Seydman, S. (2011). Controversy in Sociology. Tehran: Tehran Publishing.
33. Shelly Lundberg and Robert A. Pollak (2015). The Evolving Role of Marriage: 1950- 2010. the future of children, 25, 29 – 50.
34. Talebi, A., Veysi, S. (2012). The Relationship Between Romantic Love and the Realization of Couples' Values. Women's Strategic Studies, 14 (56), 247-283.
35. Tavasoli, A., Saidy, V. (2011). The Effect of Women's Employment on the Power Structure in the Families of the City of Ivaqi. Women in Development and Politics (Women's Research), 9 (3), 133-1493.
36. Zarabi, V., Mostafave, S. (2011). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Age of Women's Marriage in Iran, An Economic Approach. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research,