نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 گروه علوم اعصاب شناختی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

3 گروه فیزیولوژی ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

4 مرکز تحقیقات عملکرد انسان، گروه علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه کنستانس، کنستانس، آلمان

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، تعیین تأثیر مدل­ های مختلف تحریک الکتریکی مستقیم فراجمجمه ­ای بر تکانش­ گری در داوران ورزشی تیمی بر مبنای سبک ­های رهبری بود. تحریک غیرتهاجمی مغز به عنوان روشی جهت بهبود عملکرد در حیطه ­های مختلف ورزش مورد استفاده قرار گرفته است؛ در حالی­که به ­نظر می­ رسد میزان تأثیرگذاری آن به عوامل مختلفی از جمله نوع تحریک و تفاوت ­های فردی بین افراد بستگی داشته باشد. از این رو، تعداد 24 داور ورزشی در رشته های تیمی فوتبال، فوتسال، والیبال، هندبال و بسکتبال شامل 12 داور با سبک رهبری تحول­گرا و 12 داور با سبک رهبری غیرتحول­گرا به صورت داوطلبانه در این پژوهش شرکت نمودند. هر آزمودنی در سه جلسۀ مجزا در آزمایشگاه با فاصلۀ حداقل 72 ساعت استراحت بین جلسات حضور یافت. در هر جلسه، ابتدا میزان تکانش ­گری با استفاده از آزمون تکانش ­گری برو/نرو مورد اندازه ­گیری قرار گرفت و سپس آزمودنی ­ها تحت یکی از 3 نوع تحریک الکتریکی جریان مستقیم فراجمجمه ­ای شامل تحریک آنودال، کاتودال یا شم به مدت 20 دقیقه با شدت 2 میلی آمپر قرار گرفتند. پس از اتمام تحریک، مجدداً میزان تکانش­ گری مورد اندازه ­گیری قرار گرفت. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از آنوای دو راهۀ مرکب نشان داد بین تحریک آند و شم و همچنین بین تحریک کاتد و شَم تفاوت معناداری وجود داشت (به ترتیب 001/0p= ؛ 02/0p= در حالی­که بین دو نوع سبک رهبری در انواع تحریک تفاوت معناداری وجود نداشت. به عنوان یک یافتۀ جدید، این نتایج مؤید امکان استفاده از تحریک الکتریکی فراجمجمه­ ای به عنوان ابزاری برای افزایش عملکرد در داوران ورزشی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Different Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Impulsivity in Sports Referees: The Role of Leadership Styles

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shahrouz Ghayebzadeh 1
  • Shirin Zardoshtian 1
  • hasan sabourimoghaddam 2
  • Ehsan Amiri 3
  • louis-solal Giboin 4

1 . Faculty of Sports Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Department of Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 Faculty of Sports Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

4 Sensorimotor Performance Lab, Human Performance Research Centre, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

چکیده [English]

Non-invasive brain stimulation has been used as a tool to boost the performance in different areas of sports, however; it seems that its effectiveness depends on several variables such as individual differences and the stimulation modalities. Accordingly, 24 male Football, Futsal, Volleyball, Basketball, and Handball referees including 12 with transformational leadership styles and 12 with non-transformational leadership styles voluntarily participated in this study. Each subject visited the laboratory on 3 different occasions interspersed with 72 hours of rest in between. In each session, the impulsivity was first measured by the Go/ No Go impulsivity test and then, subjects were exposed to one of the three models of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) including Anodal, Cathodal, and Sham stimulation for 20 minutes at 2 mA intensity. After the cessation of the stimulation, the impulsivity was again measured under a similar condition. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used for statistical analysis and the results showed that there were significant differences between Anodal and sham, and Cathodal and sham stimulations on impulsivity (p=0.001; p=0.02, respectively) while, no significant differences were seen between the leadership styles on different types of stimulation. As a novel finding, these results indicated the possibility of using tDCS intervention to enhance the performance of sports referees.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
  • Sports Referees
  • Impulsivity
  • Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
1.    abassi, S., asberi, A., Taheri, F. (2020). Effect of Shared Leadership on Team Commitment of the Iranian Professional Handball Players: Modulating Role of Psychological Empowerment. Sport Psychology Studies, 9(33), 171-186. doi: 10.22089/spsyj.2020.8110.1880 In Persian.
2.    Allenby, C., Falcone, M., Bernardo, L., Wileyto, E. P., Rostain, A., Ramsay, J. R., Loughead, J. (2018). Transcranial direct current brain stimulation decreases impulsivity in ADHD. Brain stimulation, 11(5), 974-981.
3.    Athari, A., Ahanchian, M. R., & Mahram, B. (2009). The relationship between employees 'attitudes toward managers' transformational leadership style with the extent of their improvement in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Master thesis (M.Sc), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. 1-111. In Persian. 
4.    Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1988). Transformational leadership, charisma, and beyond. In Emerging leadership vistas. (pp. 29-49). Lexington, MA, England: Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Com.
5.    Bahrami, A., Moradi, J., Etaati, Z. (2021). The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) on Mental Fatigue and performance of Basketball Player. Sport Psychology Studies, 10(35), 167-186. doi: 10.22089/spsyj.2020.8453.1917 In Persian.
6.    Bari, A., & Robbins, T. W. (2013). Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control. Progress in neurobiology, 108, 44-79. 
7.    Barratt, E. S. (1993). Impulsivity: Integrating cognitive, behavioral, biological, and environmental data. 
8.    Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). Multifactor leadership questionnaire (MLQ) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t03624-000. 
9.    Bell, S. B., Turner, B., Sawaki, L., & DeWall, N. (2020). When brain stimulation backfires: the effects of prefrontal cortex stimulation on impulsivity. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, nasaa049. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa049. 
10.    Borducchi, D. M., Gomes, J. S., Akiba, H., Cordeiro, Q., Borducchi, J. H. M., Valentin, L. S. S., Dias, Á. M. (2016). Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on athletes’ cognitive performance: an exploratory proof of concept trial. Frontiers in psychiatry, 7, 183. 
11.    Cheng, G. L., & Lee, T. M. (2016). Altering risky decision-making: Influence of impulsivity on the neuromodulation of prefrontal cortex. Social neuroscience, 11(4), 353-364. 
12.    Davis, N. J. (2013). Neurodoping: brain stimulation as a performance-enhancing measure. Sports Med, 43(8), 649-653. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0027-z
13.    Dickman, S. J. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(1), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.95.
14.    Eberlin, R. J., & Tatum, B. C. (2008). Making just decisions: organizational justice, decision making, and leadership. Management decision. 46(2) 310-329.
15.    Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1977). The place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality description. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16(1), 57-68. 
16.    Filmer, H. L., Dux, P. E., & Mattingley, J. B. (2014). Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function. Trends in neurosciences, 37(12), 742-753. 
17.    Friehs, M. A., Güldenpenning, I., Frings, C., & Weigelt, M. (2019). Electrify your game! Anodal tDCS increases the resistance to head fakes in basketball. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1-9. 
18.    Gandiga, P. C., Hummel, F. C., & Cohen, L. G. (2006). Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clinical neurophysiology, 117(4), 845-850.
19.    Ghayebzadeh, S., Zardoshtian, S., sabourimoghaddam, H., Amiri, E., Giboin, L. (2021). The effect of Different Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Risky Decision-Making in Sports Referees. Sport Physiology, 13(51), 117-138. doi: 10.22089/spj.2021.10363.2126. 
20.    Giboin, L. S., & Gruber, M. (2018). Anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation can decrease force output of knee extensors during an intermittent MVC fatiguing task in young healthy male participants. J Neurosci Res, 96(9), 1600-1609. doi:10.1002/jnr.24254.
21.    Gilmore, C. S., Dickmann, P. J., Nelson, B. G., Lamberty, G. J., & Lim, K. O. (2018). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) paired with a decision-making task reduces risk-taking in a clinically impulsive sample. Brain stimulation, 11(2), 302-309. 
22.    Kamali, A.-M., Saadi, Z. K., Yahyavi, S.-S., Zarifkar, A., Aligholi, H., & Nami, M. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance athletic performance outcome in experienced bodybuilders. PloS one, 14(8), e0220363.
23.    kamali, F., manochehri Nezhad, M., hakak zadeh, M. (2021). Designing an Ethical Decision-Making Model for Professional Football Referees in Iran. Sport Psychology Studies, 9(34), 235-258. doi: 10.22089/spsyj.2020.9405.2030 .In Persian. 
24.    King, K. M., Patock-Peckham, J. A., Dager, A. D., Thimm, K., & Gates, J. R. (2014). On the mismeasurement of impulsivity: Trait, behavioral, and neural models in alcohol research among adolescents and young adults. Current Addiction Reports, 1(1), 19-32. 
25.    Lord, R. G., & Shondrick, S. J. (2011). Leadership and knowledge: Symbolic, connectionist, and embodied perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 207-222. 
26.    Martínez-Moreno, A., Ibáñez-Pérez, R., & Sánchez-Roca, C. (2020). Leadership, stress and burnout among basketball referees. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 16(1). 84-96. 
27.    Mayer, J. T., Chopard, G., Nicolier, M., Gabriel, D., Masse, C., Giustiniani, J., Bennabi, D. (2020). Can transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) improve impulsivity in healthy and psychiatric adult populations? A systematic review. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 98, 109814. 
28.    Mayer, J. T., Nicolier, M., Gabriel, D., Masse, C., Giustiniani, J., Compagne, C., Vandel, P., Pazart, L., Haffen, E., Bennabi, D. (2019). Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in reducing impulsivity in borderline personality disorder (TIMBER): study protocol of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Trials, 20(1), 347. 
29.    Moeller, F. G., Barratt, E. S., Dougherty, D. M., Schmitz, J. M., & Swann, A. C. (2001). Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. American journal of psychiatry, 158(11), 1783-1793.
30.    Naemi Tajdar, M., namazi zadeh, M., nasri, S., vaez mosavi, M. (2020). The Added Effect of Direct Electrical Stimulation of the Brain with Aerobic Exercise on Consolidating Explicit Motor Memory. Sport Psychology Studies, 9(33), 273-292. doi: 10.22089/spsyj.2020.9194.1996 .In Persian. 
31.    Nitsche, M. A., Seeber, A., Frommann, K., Klein, C. C., Rochford, C., Nitsche, M. S., Fricke, K., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Antal, A., Paulus, W., & Tergau, F. (2005). Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. The Journal of physiology, 568(1), 291-303. 
32.    Ota, K., Shinya, M., & Kudo, K. (2019). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Risk-Attitude in Motor Decision-Making. Front Hum Neurosci, 13, 297. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00297
33.    Ouellet, J., McGirr, A., Van den Eynde, F., Jollant, F., Lepage, M., & Berlim, M. T. (2015). Enhancing decision-making and cognitive impulse control with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC): A randomized and sham-controlled exploratory study. Journal of psychiatric research, 69, 27-34. 
34.    Parker-Tomlin, M., Boschen, M., Glendon, I., Morrissey, S. (2018). Factors influencing health practitioners’ cognitive processing and decision-making style. Journal of interprofessional care. 33(5), 546–557. 
35.    Pérez, J. J. R. (2014). El tiempo de reacción específico visual en deportes de combate. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. http://hdl.handle.net/10486/661009, 
36.    Raio, C. M., Konova, A. B., Otto, A. R. (2020). Trait impulsivity and acute stress interact to influence choice and decision speed during multi-stage decision-making. Scientific reports, 10. 7754.
37.    Reardon, S. (2016). ‘Brain doping’may improve athletes’ performance. Nature News, 531(7594), 283–284. Doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.19534. 
38.    Shen, B., Yin, Y., Wang, J., Zhou, X., McClure, S. M., & Li, J. (2016). High-definition tDCS alters impulsivity in a baseline-dependent manner. Neuroimage, 143, 343-352. 
39.    Vinogradov, S., Fisher, M., & de Villers-Sidani, E. (2012). Cognitive training for impaired neural systems in neuropsychiatric illness. Neuropsychopharmacology, 37(1), 43-76. 
40.    Woods, A. J., Antal, A., Bikson, M., Boggio, P. S., Brunoni, A. R., Celnik, P., Kappenman, E. S. (2016). A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clinical neurophysiology, 127(2), 1031-1048.