مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی

مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی

ارتباط همدلی با فعالیت نورون‌های آینه‌ای در تکلیف لیدر-پیرو: شواهد عصب-روان شناختی و کینماتیکی

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری یادگیری حرکتی، گروه علوم رفتاری و شناختی ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی و تندرستی دانشگاه تهران. تهران. ایران
2 دانشیار گروه علوم رفتاری و شناختی ورزشی دانشکده علوم ورزشی و تندرستی، دانشگاه تهران. تهران. ایران
3 دانشیار، گروه آسیب شناسی و بیومکانیک ورزشی دانشکده علوم ورزشی و تندرستی، دانشگاه تهران. تهران. ایران
4 واحد تحقیقات هوش زیستی، مرکز مغز شریف، گروه مهندسی برق، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران
چکیده
اهداف: همدلی به عنوان یکی از مکانیزم‌های روان‌شناختی هماهنگی حرکتی در نظر گرفته می‌شود و طبق مطالعات قبلی، می تواند در رفتار و شاخص‌های عصبی مغز منعکس شود. بنابراین هدف از مطالعه حاضر بررسی ارتباط بین فعالیت نورون های آینه‌ای در تکلیف هماهنگی حرکتی بین فردی لیدر – پیرو با همدلی است. مواد و روش‌ها: شرکت‌کنندگان، 16 دختر راست‌دست با میانگین سن 4/3 ± 47/25 سال بودند که به صورت داوطلبانه در این پژوهش شرکت کردند. آزمودنی‌ها، 2 کوشش 30 ثانیه‌ای یک تکلیف هماهنگی حرکتی ریتمیک بین فردی را با یک الگوی ویدئویی، اجرا کردند. یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد بین توان ریتم بتابالا (HB) و میزان تأخیر در حرکت ارتباط مستقیم معنی‌داری وجود دارد. هم‌چنین، سرکوب ریتم مو و بتاپایین (LB) و HB با همدلی واکنشی ارتباط مستقیم معنی‌دار دارد. با این حال پس از کنترل متغیرهای رفتاری، ارتباط همدلی واکنشی با HB حذف شد؛ نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج این مطالعه از هر دو فرضیه برتری نیمکره راست و فرضیه ظرفیت در بحث مکانیزم‌های عصبی همدلی حمایت می‌کند؛ به علاوه، اهمیت کنترل داده‌های رفتاری در تفسیر نتایج، نوع تکلیف و نقش فرد در تکلیف هماهنگی حرکتی بین فردی (لیدر / پیرو) می‌تواند جزء عوامل مؤثر در رابطه عصب- روانشناختی همدلی مورد توجه قرار بگیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The Relationship of Empathy with Mirror Neurons Activation in the Leader-follower Task: A Neuropsychological and kinematic Evidence

نویسندگان English

Masoumeh Doosti 1
Shahzad Tahmasebi Boroujeni 2
Elham Shirzad eraghi 3
Ali Ghazizadeh Ehsaei 4
1 Ph. D. Candidate in Motor Learning, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences in Sport,. Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences in Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Sports Pathology and Biomechanics, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
4 Bio-intelligence Research Unit, Sharif Brain Center, Electrical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Objectives: Empathy is considered as one of the psychological mechanisms of motor coordination and. according to previous studies, it can be reflected in behavioral and neurological indicators. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the relationship between the activity of mirror neurons in the leader-follower interpersonal motor coordination task with empathy. Methods & Materials: The participants were 16 right-handed women with an average age of 25.47 ± 3.4 who voluntarily participated in this research. Subjects performed two 30-second trials of a rhythmic movement coordination task with a video model. Results: The results showed that there is a significant direct relationship between high beta (HB) rhythm power and delay in movement. Also, suppression of mu rhythm and low beta (LB) and HB has a significant direct relationship with reactive empathy. However, after controlling for behavioral variables, the correlation of reactive empathy with HB was eliminated. Conclusions: The results of this study support both right-hemisphere hypothesis and the valence specific hypothesis in the discussion of neural mechanisms of empathy; nevertheless, the type of task and the role of the individual in the interpersonal motor coordination task (leader/follower) can be discussed among the effective factors in the neuro-psychological relationship of empathy.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Interpersonal coordination
Social interaction
Electroencephalography
Mu rhythm
Beta
1.       Balconi, M., Grippa, E., & Vanutelli, M. E. (2015). Resting lateralized activity predicts the cortical response and appraisal of  emotions: an fNIRS study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(12), 1607–1614. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv041
2.       Barone, J., & Rossiter, H. E. (2021). Understanding the Role of Sensorimotor Beta Oscillations. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 15(May), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.655886
3.       Brunsdon, V. E. A., Bradford, E. E. F., Smith, L., & Ferguson, H. J. (2020). Short-term physical training enhances mirror system activation to action observation. Social Neuroscience, 15(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2019.1660708
4.       Cornejo, C., Cuadros, Z., Morales, R., & Paredes, J. (2017). Interpersonal coordination: Methods, achievements, and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(SEP), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01685
5.       Corradini, A., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Mirror neurons and their function in cognitively understood empathy. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(3), 1152–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.003
6.       de Waal, F. B. M., & Preston, S. D. (2017). Mammalian empathy: behavioural manifestations and neural basis. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(8), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.72
7.       Endedijk, H. M., Meyer, M., Bekkering, H., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Hunnius, S. (2017). Neural mirroring and social interaction: Motor system involvement during action observation relates to early peer cooperation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.001
8.       Fan, Y., & Han, S. (2008). Temporal dynamic of neural mechanisms involved in empathy for pain: An event-related brain potential study. Neuropsychologia, 46(1), 160–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.023
9.       Festante, F., Vanderwert, R. E., Sclafani, V., Paukner, A., Simpson, E. A., Suomi, S. J., Fox, N. A., & Ferrari, P. F. (2018). EEG beta desynchronization during hand goal-directed action observation in newborn monkeys and its relation to the emergence of hand motor skills. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(March), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.02.010
10.   Gainotti, G. (2019). A historical review of investigations on laterality of emotions in the human brain. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 28(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2018.1524683
11.   Ge, S., Wang, P., Liu, H., Lin, P., Gao, J., Wang, R., Iramina, K., Zhang, Q., & Zheng, W. (2019). Neural Activity and Decoding of Action Observation Using Combined EEG and fNIRS Measurement. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13(October), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00357
12.   Huang, C.-W., Wu, B. C. Y., Nguyen, P. A., Wang, H.-H., Kao, C.-C., Lee, P.-C., Rahmanti, A. R., Hsu, J. C., Yang, H.-C., & Li, Y.-C. J. (2023). Emotion recognition in doctor-patient interactions from real-world clinical video database: Initial development of artificial empathy. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 233, 107480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107480
13.   Keller, P. E., Novembre, G., & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0394
14.   Kodama, K., Hori, K., Tanaka, S., & Matsui, H. (2018). How Interpersonal Coordination Can Reflect Psychological Counseling: An Exploratory Study. Psychology, 09(05), 1128–1142. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.95070
15.   Kuijt, A., & Alimardani, M. (2020). Prediction of Human Empathy based on EEG Cortical Asymmetry. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems, ICHMS 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209561
16.   Levy, J., Goldstein, A., Pratt, M., & Feldman, R. (2018). Maturation of pain empathy from child to adult shifts from single to multiple neural rhythms to support interoceptive representations. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19810-3
17.   Mara, D. (2017). The function of mirror neurons in the learning process. MATEC Web of Conferences, 121, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712112012
18.   Maximiano-Barreto, M. A., de Lima Bomfim, A. J., Borges, M. M., de Moura, A. B., Luchesi, B. M., & Chagas, M. H. N. (2022). Recognition of Facial Expressions of Emotion and Depressive Symptoms among Caregivers with Different Levels of Empathy. Clinical Gerontologist, 45(5), 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2021.1937426
19.   Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x
20.   Mu, Y., Cerritos, C., & Khan, F. (2018). Neural mechanisms underlying interpersonal coordination: A review of hyperscanning research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12421
21.   Novembre, G., Mitsopoulos, Z., & Keller, P. E. (2019). Empathic perspective taking promotes interpersonal coordination through music. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48556-9
22.   Novembre, G., Ticini, L. F., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Keller, P. E. (2012). Distinguishing self and other in joint action. Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 22(12), 2894–2903. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr364
23.   Palacios-García, I., Silva, J., Villena-González, M., Campos-Arteaga, G., Artigas-Vergara, C., Luarte, N., Rodríguez, E., & Bosman, C. A. (2021). Increase in Beta Power Reflects Attentional Top-Down Modulation After Psychosocial Stress Induction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15(March), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.630813
24.   Pfeifer, J. H., Iacoboni, M., Mazziotta, J. C., & Dapretto, M. (2008). Mirroring others’ emotions relates to empathy and interpersonal competence in children. NeuroImage, 39(4), 2076–2085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.032
25.   Richardson, M. J., Dale, R., & Marsh, K. L. (2014). Complex Dynamical Systems in Social and Personality Psychology: Theory, Modeling, and Analysis. In H. T. Reis & C. M. E. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 253–282). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996481.015
26.   Riečanský, I., Paul, N., Kölble, S., Stieger, S., & Lamm, C. (2015). Beta oscillations reveal ethnicity ingroup bias in sensorimotor resonance to pain of others. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(7), 893–901. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu139
27.   Rizzolatti, G., Fabbri-Destro, M., & Gerbella, M. (2016). The mirror neuron mechanism. In The Curated Reference Collection in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology (Issue January). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23571-2
28.   Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–726. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00003435
29.   Steward, M. (2017). Empathy and the Role of Mirror Neurons. All Regis University Theses, 80.
30.   Vanderwert, R. E., Fox, N. A., & Ferrari, P. F. (2013). The mirror mechanism and mu rhythm in social development. Neuroscience Letters, 540, 15–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.10.006
31.   Vicaria, I. M., & Dickens, L. (2016). Meta-Analyses of the Intra- and Interpersonal Outcomes of Interpersonal Coordination. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40(4), 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-016-0238-8
32.   Yavari, N., Shojaei, M., & Daneshfar, A. (2018). The Study of the Association between Mirror Neurons Activities and Electrical Activity of Muscles in Terms of Social-Comparative Video Feedback of Golf Putt in Young Females. Neuropsychology, 4(12), 61-76. In persian
33.   Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 675–680. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3085
34.   Zarshghaee, M., Nori, A., & Oraizi, H. (2009). Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale. Psychological Methods and Models, 1(1), 39–50. In persian
Zheng, W.-L., Zhu, J.-Y., Peng, Y., & Lu, B.-L. (2014). EEG-based emotion classification using deep belief networks. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2014.6890166
دوره 14، شماره 52
تابستان 1404
صفحه 23-43

  • تاریخ دریافت 30 شهریور 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 13 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 16 بهمن 1402