مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

در باره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

داوران

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

هزینه های دریافتی نشریه

راهنمای نگارش مقاله

فرم ها

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

تأثیر بازخورد هنجاری بر انگیزۀ درونی دانشجویان مبتدی در عملکرد پایداری قامت

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد رفتار حرکتی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران

2 دانشجوی دکتری رفتار حرکتی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، تعیین تأثیر بازخورد هنجاری مثبت بر انگیزۀ درونی افراد مبتدی بود. بدین‌منظور، 30 دانشجوی پسر دانشگاه شهید بهشتی به­طور تصادفی در سه گروه هنجاری مثبت، منفی و کنترل برای انجام آزمون پایداری قامت قرار گرفتند. مرحلة اکتساب شامل‌ 160 کوشش (16 بلوک 10 کوششی) در مدت چهار روز بود. بازخورد هنجاری به شکل 10‌ درصد بالاتر یا پایین­تر از میانگین واقعی در پایان هر بلوک تمرینی ارائه شد. شرکت­کنندگان در پایان مرحلۀ اکتساب، پرسش­نامة انگیزة درونی را تکمیل کردند. نتایج آزمون تحلیل واریانس نشان داد که بین گروه­ها در خرده‌مقیاس‌های شایستگی ادراک‌شده، کوشش/ تلاش و نمرۀ کلی انگیزۀ درونی، تفاوت معناداری وجود دار

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Normative Feedback on Beginner Students’ Intrinsic Motivation in Performance of Postural Stability

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeed Ashrafpoor Navaee 1
  • Rasol Abedanzadeh 2
  • Esmaeel Saemi 2

1

2

چکیده [English]

The purpose of current study was to determine the effect of normative feedback on beginner students’ intrinsic motivation in performance of postural stability. Thirty male students (22/2 ± 9/22) of Shahid Beheshti University were randomly assigned to three groups: positive and negative normative feedback and control groups. Acquisition phase consisted of 160 trials (16 blocks of 10 attempts) throughout 4 days. Normative feedback was provided in the form of a 10% higher or lower than the actual average training at the end of each block. Participants at the end of the acquisition phase completed the intrinsic motivation questionnaire. The results of ANOVA indicated that there are significance differences between groups in perceived competence, effort/importance subscales and also in the total score of the intrinsic motivation. According to these findings it suggest to coaches providing successful experiences by feedback presentation and emphasis on their positive function arise good effect on motor performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Intrinsic motivation
  • Normative Feedback
  • Postural Stability
  • Beginner Students
مراجع
  1. Aiken, C., Fairbrother, J. T., & Post, P. G. (2012). The effects of self-controlled video feedback on the basketball set shot.  Front. Movement Science Sport Psychology, 3; Pp: 338.
  2. Amorose, A. J., & Horn, T. S. (2000). Intrinsic motivation relationships with collegiate athletes gender, scholarship status, and perceptions of their coaches behavior. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22; Pp: 63-84.
  3. Ávila, L. T. G., Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Positive social comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology of Sport & Exercise. 13; Pp: 849–853
  4. Badami, R., Kohestani,S., & Taghian‌, F. (2011 b). Feedback on more accurate trials enhances learning of sport skills. World Applied Sciences Journal, 133; Pp: 537-540. In Persian.
  5. Badami, R., Vaez Mousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2012). Feedback about more accurate versus less accurate trials: Differential effects on self-confidence and activation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83; Pp: 196-203.
  6. Bandura, A., & Jourden, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60; Pp: 941–951. In Persian.  Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78; Pp: 40-47.
  7. Chiviacowsky, S., Godinho, M., & Tani, G. (2005). Self-controlled knowledge of results: Effects of different schedules and task complexity. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 49(4); Pp: 277-296.
  8. Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Machado, C., & Rydberg, N. (2012). Self-controlled feedback enhances learning in adults with down syndrome.  Rev Bras Fisioter, São Carlos, 16(3); Pp: 191-196.
  9. Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Wally, R., & Borges, T. (2009). Knowledge of results after good trials enhances learning in older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80; Pp: 663-668.
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M .(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
  11. Fairbrother,  J.,  Laughlin,  D., & Nguyen, T. (2012).  Self-controlled feedback facilitates motor learning in both high and low activity individuals. Front. Movement Science Sport Psychology, 3; Pp: 338.
  12. Foll, D. L., Rascle, o., & Higgins, n. c. (2008). Attributional feedback-induced changes in functional and dysfunctional attributions, expectations of success, hopefulness, and short-term persistence in a novel sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 9(2); Pp: 77-101.
  13. Hollembeak, J., & Amorose, A. J. ( 2005). Perceived coaching behaviors and college athletes intrinsic. motivation: a test of self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17; Pp: 20-36 .
  14. Hutchinson, J. C., Sherman, T., Martinovic, N., & Tenenbaum, G. (2007). The effect of manipulated self-efficacy on perceived and sustained effort. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 20; Pp: 457-472.
  15. Inoue, N. (2007). Why face a challenge? The reason behind intrinsically motivated students spontaneous choice of challenging tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 17; Pp: 251-259.
  16. Johnson, D. S.,   Turban, D. B., Pieper K. F., & Ng, Y. M. (1996). Exploring the role of normative‐and performance‐based feedback in motivational processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26; Pp: 973 – 992.
  17. Kerr, J. H., Fujiyama, H., Wilson, G. V., & Nakamori, K. (2006). The experience of a modern dance group: Arousal, motivation, and self-rated performance. Research in Dance Education. 7(2); Pp: 125-140.
  18. Koka, A., & Hein, V. (2003). Perceptions of teachers’ feedback and learning environment as predictors of intrinsic motivation in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 4; Pp: 333-346.
  19. Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2010). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1; Pp: 1-12.
  20. Mouratidis, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Sideridis, G. (2008). The motivating role of positive feedback in sport and physical education: Evidence for a motivational model. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30; Pp: 240-268.
  21. Nicaise, V., Bois, J. E., Fairclough, S. J., Amorose, A. J., & Cogerino, G. (2007). Girls and boys perceptions of physical education teachers feedback: Effects on performance and psychological responses. Journal of Sports Sciences. 25(8); Pp: 915-926.
  22. Saemi, E., Porter, J. M., Ghotbi-Varzaneh, A., Zarghami, M., & Maleki, F. (2012). Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 13; Pp: 378-382. In Persian.
  23. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience (Pp: 59-75). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  24. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor learning and learning: A behavioral emphasis. (5th ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  25. Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2002). Performance goals: The moderating roles of context and achievement orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6); Pp: 603-610.
  26. Stoate, I., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Enhanced expectancies improve movement efficiency in runners. Journal of Sport sciences. Pp: 1-9.
  27. Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, G. (1984 ). On the casual effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Sport Psychology. 6; Pp: 94 - 102.
  28. Viciana, J., Cervello, E. M., & Ramirez-lechuga, J. (2007). Effect of manipulating positive and negative feedback on goal orientations, perceived motivational climate, satisfaction, task choice, perception of ability, and attitude toward physical education lessons. Perceptual and motor skills, 105(1); Pp: 67.
  29. Weiss, M. R, & Ferrercaja, E. (2002). Motivation orientation and sport behavior. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (Pp: 101-184). (2nd ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  30. West, R. L., Bagwell, D. K., & Dark-Freudeman, A. (2005 ). Memory and goal setting: The response of older and younger adults to positive and objective feedback. Psychology and Aging, 20; Pp: 195-201.
  31. Wulf, G. (2014).  Motor learning and control: Changing our view of motor learners: From information processors to human beings. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36; Pp: 1-5. Human Kinetics, Inc.
  32. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In A. M. William & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice (Pp: 121-144). London: Routledge.
  33. Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Normative feedback effects on learning a timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 81; Pp: 425-431.
  34. Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Altering mindset can enhance motor learning in older adults. Psychology & Aging. 27; pP: 14-21.
  35. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self – regulation: A social cognitive perspecitive. In M, Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self regulation (Pp: 13-55). Sam Diego, CA: Academic Press.

 

 

 

مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی
دوره 4، شماره 11 - شماره پیاپی 11
خرداد 1394
صفحه 15-26
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 04 مرداد 1394
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 04 مرداد 1394
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار