نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل
نویسندگان
1 گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد گرگان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرگان، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد گرگان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرگان، ایران
چکیده
هدف از پژوهش حاضر، تبیین مدل ابعاد اجتماعی موثر بر توسعه روانشناسی سیاسی در ورزش بود. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی، از حیث ماهیت توصیفی- همبستگی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش کلیه متخصصین و خبرگان حوزه روانشناسی، حوزه علوم سیاسی، خبرگان حوزه جامعه‌شناسی و مدیریت ورزشی، ارکان ورزش (وزارت ورزش، مدیران، مربیان، ورزشکاران و داوران ورزشی) و اساتید و محققین دانشگاهی که در حوزه تخصصی روانشناسی سیاسی ورزش فعالیت داشتند. نمونه آماری با استفاده از روش هدفمند دردسترس انتخاب شدند (375 نفر). جهت جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته استفاده شد و روایی صوری پرسشنامه توسط صاحب‌نظران (9 نفر)، تائید شد. همچنین پایایی آن با استفاده از آزمون آلفای کرونباخ (91/0) و پایایی ترکیبی محاسبه شد. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها و بررسی برازش مدل از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری در نرم‌افزار PLS3-SPSS24 استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان داد که ابعاد راهبردها بر پیامدها با مقدار (761/0) بیشترین تاثیر و شرایط علی بر پدیده اصلی با مقدار (313/0)، شرایط زمینه‌ای بر پدیده اصلی با مقدار (760/0)، پدیده اصلی بر راهبردها با مقدار (519/0) و شرایط مداخله‌گر بر پدیده اصلی با مقدار (449/0)، دارای نقش مستقیم و معنی‌داری در تبیین مدل ابعاد اجتماعی موثر بر توسعه روانشناسی سیاسی در ورزش بودند. به‌طور‌کلی، بر اساس یافته‌های پژوهش می‌توان گفت که توجه به عوامل اجتماعی، مهارت‌های روانشناسی و توانمندسازی مهارت‌های ادراکی و مهارت مدیران سیاسی - ورزشی می‌تواند به پیامدهای مطلوب ابعاد اجتماعی موثر بر توسعه‌ای روانشناسی سیاسی ورزش در ایران بیانجامد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Explaining the model of social dimensions affecting the development of political psychology in sports
نویسندگان [English]
- Tina SoltanAhmadi 1
- Zynalabedin Fallah 2
- Taher Bahlekeh 1
1 Department of Physical Education, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Physical Education Department, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this research was to explain the model of social dimensions effective on the development of political psychology in sports. The current research is descriptive-correlational in terms of applied purpose. The statistical population of the research is all specialists and experts in the field of psychology, the field of political science, experts in the field of Sociology and sports management, sports bodies (Ministry of Sports, managers, trainers, athletes and sports referees) and University professors and researchers who worked in the specialized field of sports political psychology. The statistical sample was selected using the available targeted method (375 people). A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data, and the face validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts (9 people). Also, its reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha test (0.91) and composite reliability. To analyze the data and check the fit of the model, structural equation modeling was used in PLS3-SPSS24 software. The results showed that the dimensions of the strategies had the greatest impact on the consequences with the value (0.761) and the causal conditions on the main phenomenon with the value (0.313), the background conditions on the main phenomenon with the value (0.760), The main phenomenon on strategies with a value of (0.519) and the intervening conditions on the main phenomenon with a value of (0.449) had a direct and significant role in explaining the model, social dimensions were effective on the development of political psychology in sports.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- political development of sports
- Social dimensions
- dimensions of sports psychology
- political psychology
- political behavior
- Abdi, K., Talebpour, M., Rankesh, M J., Jabari, H. (2019). Designing a sports diplomacy model using the perspective of international experts. 21 (4). 365-381.
- Afroozeh, M. S., Mozafari, A. A., Aghaee, N., & Safari, M. (2017). Codification of Social Responsibility Strategies for Football Clubs of Iran's Primer League. Sport Management Studies, 9(43), 199-216.
- Alavi, S. H., & Dousti, M. (2022). Designing a pattern of political behavior in strategic decision making of Iranian sports managers. Bi-Quarterly Political Knowledge, 18(1), 199-218.
- Bakshi Chenari, A R., Zardashtian, Shirin., & Mohammadi Jame, H. (2019). A comparative study of sports diplomacy actions and experiences in the Islamic Republic of Iran and selected countries. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Communication Management in Sports Media, 7(3), 69-80.
- Beattie, P. (2018). Social evolution, political psychology, and the media in democracy: The invisible hand in the US marketplace of ideas. Springer Nature Publication.
- Boiché, J., Plaza, M., Chalabaev, A., Guillet-Descas, E., & Sarrazin, P. (2014). Social antecedents and consequences of gender-sport stereotypes during adolescence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(2), 259-274.
- Boykoff, J. 2016. Power games: A political history of the Olympics. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
- Chalabaev, A., Sarrazin, P., Fontayne, P., Boiché, J., & Clément-Guillotin, C. (2013). The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: Review and future directions. Psychology of sport and exercise, 14(2), 136-144.
- Dubinsky, Y. (2019). From soft power to sports diplomacy: a theoretical and conceptual discussion. Place Brand Public 1(15), PP 156–164.
- Fani, A. A., Sheikhinejad, F., danaeefard, H., & Hasanzadeh, A. (2014). Inquiry about the factors affecting the formation of political behavior in organization. Journal of Public Administration, 6(1), 151-174.
- Ferris, G., Treadway, D., Kolodinsky, R., Hochwarter, W., Kacmar, C., Douglas, C & Frink, D. (2107). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1). 126-152.
- Heslop, L.A., J. Nadeau, and N. O’Reilly. (2010). China and the Olympics: Views of insiders and outsiders. International Marketing Review 27(1). PP 404–433.
- Hizli Sayar, Gokben; Unubol, Huseyin; Ulke Aribogan, Deniz; and Tarhan, Nevzat (2020) "Turkey’s Map of Emotions and Its Political Reflections," New England Journal of Public Policy: 32(2), Article 9.
- Hoekman, R., Elling, A., & van der Poel, H. (2022). Local policymaking in sport: Sport managers’ perspectives on work processes and impact. Journal of Global Sport Management, 7(1), 89-111.
- Humphreys, B.R., Zhou, Y (2022). The Politics of Sports: Introduction to the Special Issue. Econ Gov.
- Keshavarz, L., Farahani, A., & Bahramipoor, B. (2018). An Analysis of Factors Affecting the Beneficiaries Behavior in Acquiring Sporting Sites in International Assemblies. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 5(2), 31-44.
- Khasti Bagh, F., & Zameni, F. (2015). Investigating the relationship between managers' power sources and employees' political behavior. Monthly research of nations. 1 (12): 105-122.
18. Maftooh, Shahrazad, (2014), Psychology of Politicians, Ghoomes Publications.
- Manners, I. (2018). Political psychology of European integration: The (re) production of identity and difference in the Brexit debate. Political Psychology, 39(6), 1213-1232.
- Monroe, K. R. (Ed.). (2001). Political psychology. Psychology Press.
- Mateo-Orcajada, A., Abenza-Cano, L., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., Martínez-Castro, S. M., Leiva-Arcas, A., Gallardo-Guerrero, A. M., & Sánchez-Pato, A. (2021). Influence of gender stereotypes, type of sport watched and close environment on adolescent sport practice according to gender. Sustainability, 13(21), 11863.
- Morehead, J., Griffin, R. (2015). Organizational behavior. Translated by Seyyed Mehdi Elwani and Gholamreza Memarzadeh, first edition, Tehran: Marvarid Publications.
- Mutisya, Mary Mwongeli (2019), The Role of Sports Diplomacy in Promoting Kenya’s Foreign Policy Goals (2002-2018).
- Petersen M.B., Laustsen L. (2020). Dominant leaders and the political psychology of followership. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 136-141.
- peymanfar, M. H., elahi, A., sajjadpour, S. M. K., & hamidi, M. (2019). Explaining of sports diplomacy by using the paradigm: a qualitative study. Sport Management Journal, 11(1), 59-75.
- Perrewé, P. L., Ferris, G. R., Frink, D. D., & Anthony, W. P. (2017). Political skill: An antidote for workplace stressors. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(3), 115-123.
- Pfister, G. (2010). Women in sport–gender relations and future perspectives. Sport in society, 13(2), 234-248.
- Rabin J.S. (2020). Behavioral Epigenetics: The Underpinnings of Political Psychology. In The Psychology of Political Behavior in a Time of Change (pp. 55-96). Springer.
- Rafei Dehkordi, F., Nazari, R., Ramezani Nejad, R. (2020). Presentation of Strategic Behavior Paradigm Model of Iranian Sport Managers based on Grounded Theory. Human Resource Management in Sports, 7(2), 351-366.
- Sabbaghian, A. (2016). Sport Diplomacy. Journal of Culture-Communication Studies, 16(31), 132-151.
- Selajeh, S., Rastkhiz, M. (2021). Examining the relationship between the political skills of managers on their political behavior with regard to the mediating role of the perception of the political environment in the executive bodies of Kerman city. Ormazd Research Journal, 54 (2): 203-236.
- Shahrezaei, F., & Shirzadi, R. (2018). Sport, Politics and International Relations. International Studies Journal (ISJ), 15(3), 185-220.
33. Shariatnia, K., Masoudli, M. (2018), political psychology and entering the field of theorizing in political science, Journal of Political Studies, 4(14): 125-93.
- Sheikhinejad, Fatima. (2012). Designing a model to explain the political behavior of employees in the studied public sector: Iran's water industry. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Economic Affairs, Tarbiat Modares University.
.
- Spencer Harris, Mathew Dowling & Barrie Houlihan (2021) An analysis of governance failure and power dynamics in international sport: The Russian doping scandal, International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(3), PP 359-378.
- Tamir I, Yehiel (Hilik) L, Yair G. (2015). Sports: Faster, Higher, Stronger, and Public Relations. Human Affairs, 25(1): 93–109.
- Van der Maat, E. (2020). Genocidal consolidation: final solutions to elite rivalry. International Organization, 74(4), 773-809.
)