تأثیر تحریک فرا جمجمه‌ای مغز (tdcs) بر توجه دیداری و کنترل پاسخ ورزشکاران شطرنج‌باز

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارومیه، ایران.

2 گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور ، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: توجه دیداری و کنترل پاسخ عنصری مؤثر برای موفقیت شطرنج‌بازان محسوب می­شود و شواهدی وجود دارد که تحریک کاتدی Fp2 و آندی C3 می­تواند در افزایش توجه دیداری و کنترل پاسخ مؤثر باشد. لذا هدف این پژوهش، بررسی اثربخشی تحریک فرا جمجمه‌ای مغز (tdcs) بر بهبود توجه دیداری و کنترل پاسخ ورزشکاران شطرنج‌باز بود.
مواد و روش ها: ازاین‌رو تعداد 20 نفر (12 دختر و 8 پسر، 15تا 35 ساله) از شطرنج‌بازان ماهر و نیمه­ماهر، به­ روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند و سپس به‌صورت گمارش تصادفی در گروه مداخله و کنترل قرار گرفتند. ابتدا هر دو گروه به‌منظور ثبت پیش­آزمون، آزمون (IVA-2) را انجام دادند و سپس گروه مداخله در 15 جلسه، تحت 20 دقیقه تحریک آندی C3 و کاتدی Fp2با شدت‌جریان 5/1 میلی­آمپر قرار گرفتند؛ اما برای گروه کنترل هیچ مداخله‌ای انجام نگرفت. در نهایت پس­آزمون IVA-2 برای سنجش و بررسی توجه دیداری و کنترل پاسخ شطرنج­بازان بعد از مداخله مجدداً اجرا شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج  آزمون کوواریانس چند متغیره (MANCOVA) نشان داد که تحریک مستقیم مغز تاثیرمعناداری در بر بهبود توجه دیداری و کنترل پاسخ ورزشکاران گذاشته است (P<0/05).
نتیجه گیری: با توجه به نتایج این پژوهش می‌توان گفت که یکی از روش‌های مؤثر بهبود توجه دیداری و مهارت‌ کنترل پاسخ، تحریک فرا جمجمه‌ای مغز (tdcs)است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Visual Attention and Response Control in Chess Players

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sabri Karimi 1
  • Heman Mahmoudfakhe 2
1 PhD Student, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran.
2 Department of Psychology, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Purpose
It seems that one of the most fundamental functions of the human brain, which is more developed than other species and is particularly important for chess players, is the process of attention (Shahhosseini et al., 2020). Attention refers to the ability to focus on important (task-relevant) information while ignoring distractions (Keller et al., 2019). It is also considered a characteristic related to optimal sports performance for elite athletes THUS In this research, it is important to deal with the level of visual attention of athletes, especially chess players, because visual attention has evolved to enable rapid analysis of important and related areas in the visual scene. This ability to direct selective attention enables rapid interpretation and interaction (Louedec et al., 2019).  Players must process and collect large amounts of visual information in a dynamic environment and respond in a timely manner (Jin et al., 2020).Another variable that affects the performance of chess players is response control. The ability to control the response is a type of cognitive control ability that helps achieve behavioral goals by adjusting perception and movement performance in a changing environment and by resolving conflicts (Ke et al., 2021). This variable is important because it enables athletes to think before acting, promoting more deliberate and strategic decision-making (Amini et al., 2022). This can impact the quality and outcomes of chess players, especially those who use hand movements to move the pieces. Given the importance of enhancing these skills for athletic success, numerous treatment and rehabilitation strategies have been introduced, with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) being one of the most notable approaches for improving cognitive functions like visual attention and response control.Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive, safe, and painless treatment that uses direct electrical currents to stimulate specific areas of the brain. During the procedure, a small electrical current (typically between 1 and 2 milliamps) is applied to the target area using either anodal stimulation (positive current) or cathodal stimulation (negative current). This stimulation typically lasts no more than 30 minutes and leads to a significant change in the excitability of neurons (Luna et al., 2020). Given the positive effects of tDCS on the performance of many athletes and the importance of attention and response control in players, the present study aimed to investigate the effect of tDCS on visual attention and response control in chess players.
Materials and Methods
This quasi-experimental study utilized a pre-test, post-test, and control group design. The sample consisted of chess players from the Mahabad Chess Board in 2022. A total of 20 participants were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group, with 10 participants in each group. The participants were aged between 15 and 35 years (12 boys and 8 girls) and had intermediate to advanced skill levels during the course of the study. Initially, all participants completed the IVA-2 test to record the pre-test results. Following this, the experimental group underwent 15 sessions of transcranial brain stimulation, while the control group received no intervention. Afterward, both groups took the post-test (IVA-2). All stages of the pre-test, post-test, and intervention sessions were conducted at the Rajan Psychotherapy and Counseling Center in Mahabad, with the intervention administered by trained professionals.  The inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: being a member of the chess players' board, having an intermediate or advanced skill level in chess, being right-handed, having parental consent (for participants under 18 years old), a willingness to participate in the research, and no history of heart or neck surgeries. Additionally, participants should not have a history of seizures or epilepsy (due to the contraindication of using tDCS for individuals with metal prostheses in the neck or those with seizure conditions). The exclusion criteria included: unwillingness to continue participation and absence from more than two treatment sessions. To adhere to ethical principles, the research participants were fully assured of the confidentiality of their information. In this study, the measurement of attention and response control was conducted using the Integrated Visual and Auditory software (IVA-2). For the implementation of the Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) intervention, an American-made ActiveDose device was used.
 Findings
Considering that the statistical analysis method of the present study was covariance analysis, its important assumptions were examined initially. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check the normality and based on the results, the distribution of scores in the dependent variables was found to be normal. To check the homogeneity of variances, Levene's test was employed, and the assumption of homogeneity of variances was confirmed. Additionally, Box's M test was used to assess the covariance-variance matrix hypothesis, and the significance level in its results was greater than 0.05, indicating that this hypothesis was upheld. Given that the assumptions were met, the use of multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) is valid, and its results are presented in Table 1.
 
According to the results presented in Table 1, there is a significant difference between the improvement of visual attention and response control in the experimental and control groups after applying the tDCS method. In other words, the tDCS method has had a significant effect on improving visual attention and response control. Considering the Eta squared values, it can be concluded that 76.5% of the changes in visual attention and 45.7% of the changes in impulsive hand movements (response control) were due to the effect of the intervention, specifically the tDCS method.
Conclusion
The present study aimed to investigate the effect of tDCS on visual attention and response control in chess players. The results showed a significant improvement in the performance of athletes from pre-test to post-test in both the experimental and control groups, with the experimental group showing a significantly greater improvement than the control group. In other words, tDCS had a significant effect on enhancing the visual attention and response control of chess players.
Funding
This study received no funding from public, commercial, or nonprofit organizations.
Authors’ Contributions
First author: Data collection and data analysis; Second author: conceptualization and presentation of the idea, authorship of the introduction, discussion and methodology; All authors contributed equally to the writing and revision of the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Transcranial Current Stimulation
  • Visual attention
  • response control
  • Chess
  1. Aiken, C. A., & Becker, K. A. (2023). Utilising an internal focus of attention during preparation and an external focus during execution may facilitate motor learning. European journal of sport science23(2), 259-266.
  2. Alipour, Ahmad. (2011). Neuropsychology Introduction Book. Tehran: Payam Nour University. Payam Nour Publications)Persian(
  3. Angius, L., Santarnecchi, E., Pascual-Leone, A., & Marcora, S. M. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves inhibitory control and endurance performance in healthy individuals. Neuroscience, 419, 34-45.

 

 

  1. Amouzadeh, F., Moradi, H., Gharayagh Zandi, H., Rostami, R., & Moghadamzadeh, A. (2022). Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the visual sustain attention of ADHD student-athletes. Journal of Sports and Motor Development and Learning, 14(2), 17-33. )Persian(.
  2. Amini, D., Almasi, M., & Noroozi Homayoon, M. (2022). Effectiveness of sensory-motor integration exercises and computerized cognitive rehabilitation on executive functions (working memory, response inhibition and cognitive flexibility) in children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Empowering Exceptional Children, 13(2), 95-79.
  3. Ayache, S. S., & Chalah, M. A. (2020). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Migraine. The Beginning of a Long Journey. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(4), 1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041194
  4. Barkley, R. A. (1997). ADHD and the nature of self-control. Guilford press.
  5. Besharat, M. A., Ghahramani, M. H., & Ahmadi, N. (2013). Athletics impulsively traits: A comparison between contact and noncontact sports. Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 3(5), 13-23.
  6. Brunoni, A., Nitsche, M., & Loo, C. (2016). Transcranial direct current stimulation in neuropsychiatric disorders. Cham, CH: Springer International Publishing.‏
  7. Brimmell, J., Edwards, E. J., & Vaughan, R. S. (2022). Executive function and visual attention in sport: a systematic review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-34.
  8. Chen, T., Wang, H., Wang, X., Zhu, C., Zhang, L., Wang, K., & Yu, F. (2021). Transcranial direct current stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves response inhibition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 162, 34-39.
  9. Etaati, Z., Gharayagh Zandi, H., & Bahrami, A. (2021). The effect of attentional focus skills training on flow of basketball players. Iranian

 

Journal of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology, 1(2), 11-20.

  1. Gao Q, Chen W, Wang Z, Lin D. )2019(Secret of the Masters: Young Chess Players Show Advanced Visual Perspective Taking. Front Psychol. Oct 24;10:2407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02407. PMID: 31708844; PMCID: PMC6821682.
  2. Giordano, J., Bikson, M., Kappenman, E. S., Clark, V. P., Coslett, H. B., Hamblin, M. R & Calabrese, E. (2017). Mechanisms and effects of transcranial direct current stimulation. Dose-Response, 15(1), 1559325816685467.
  3. Gaynor, A. M., Pergolizzi, D., Alici, Y., Ryan, E., McNeal, K., Ahles, T. A., & Root, J. C. (2020). Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on sustained attention in breast cancer survivors: Evidence for feasibility, tolerability, and initial efficacy. Brain stimulation, 13(4), 1108-1116.
  4. Jin, P., Li, X., Ma, B., Guo, H., Zhang, Z., & Mao, L. (2020). Dynamic visual attention characteristics and their relationship to match performance in skilled basketball players. PeerJ, 8, e9803.‏
  5. Jahani, M., Nasehi, M., Tehrani-Doost, M., Harirchian, M. H., & Zarrindast, M. (2022). Investigating the Effect of Anodal tDCS on Sustained Attention in Patients with MS. Journal of Cognitive Psychology.‎
  6. Jazini, F., & Sheikh, M. (2022). the Effect of Transcranial Direct Electrical Stimulation (tDCS) of the Visual Cortex on the Acquisition and Persistence of Motor Performance and Working Memory in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorders. Neuropsychology, 8(2), 59-72.‏
  7. KIYANI, R., & DERAKHSHANI, E. (2022). Investigating the effect of Neurofeedback Training on the accuracy and Concentration of professional chess players. Journal of Sport Management and Motor Behavior18(36), 34-17. (Persian).
  8. Keller, A. S., Leikauf, J. E., Holt-Gosselin, B., Staveland, B. R., & Williams, L. M. (2019). Paying attention to attention in depression. Translational psychiatry, 9(1), 279.

 

  1. Kavianpour, F., Malekpour, M., & A'bedi, A. (2013). Efficacy of executive functions training (response inhibition) on the rate of impulsivity in preschool children with developmental coordination disorder: Single-subject research. Archives of Rehabilitation, 14(1), 70-80.
  2. Ke, L., Lanlan, Z., Jian, Z., & Jianing, W. (2021). Comparison of open-skill and closed-skill exercises in improving the response inhibitory ability of the elderly: a protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ open, 11(11), e051966.
  3. Louedec, J. L., Guntz, T., Crowley, J. L., & Vaufreydaz, D. (2019, June). Deep learning investigation for chess player attention prediction using eye-tracking and game data. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (pp. 1-9).
  4. Lage, G. M., Malloy-Diniz, L. F., Neves, F. S., de Moraes, P. H. P., & Corrêa, H. (2012). A kinematic analysis of the association between impulsivity and manual aiming control. Human movement science, 31(4), 811-823.‏
  5. Luna, F. G., Román-Caballero, R., Barttfeld, P., Lupiáñez, J., & Martín-Arévalo, E. (2020). A High-Definition tDCS and EEG study on attention and vigilance: Brain stimulation mitigates the executive but not the arousal vigilance decrement. Neuropsychologia, 142, 107447.
  6. Labree, B., Hoare, D. J., Gascoyne, L. E., Scutt, P., Del Giovane, C., & Sereda, M. (2022). Determining the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus, depression, and anxiety: a systematic review. Brain Sciences, 12(4), 484.
  7. Mohammadbagher, A., mohammadifar, M., aminbidokhti, A., & izanloo, B. (2020). Success factors of professional chess players: the role of brain’s executive functions considering the mediating role of resiliency. Journal of Psychological Science. 19(89), 579-591.
  8. Mannarelli, D., Pauletti, C., Petritis, A., Delle

 

Chiaie, R., Currà, A., Trompetto, C., & Fattapposta, F. (2020). Effects of cerebellar tDCS on inhibitory control: evidence from a go/NoGo task. The Cerebellum, 19, 788-

  1. Mehrvali, F., Atash Afrouz, A., & Omidian, M. (2023). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Sensorimotor Integration on Executive Functions) Cognitive Flexibility and Response Inhibition (of Students with Specific Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12(4), 114-99.
  2. Machado, S., Travassos, B., Teixeira, D. S., Rodrigues, F., Cid, L., & Monteiro, D. (2021). Could tDCS be a potential performance-enhancing tool for acute neurocognitive modulation in eSports? A perspective review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3678.
  3. Nejati M, Nejati V. (2012).Frontal lobe function in chess players. Acta Med Iran. 2012;50(5):311-4. PMID: 22837083.
  4. Oliveira, P., Barbosa, M. Z., Thome-Souza, S., Razza, L. B., Gallucci-Neto, J., Valiengo, L. D. C. L., & Brunoni, A. R. (2021). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the management of epilepsy: A systematic review. Seizure, 86, 85-95.
  5. Shahhosseini, M., Sabahi, P., Makvand Hosseini, S., & Golmohammadi, B. (2020). Effectiveness of mindfulness sport performance enhancement (MSPE) on attention, planning and sport performance of elite Judoka. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry7(2), 37-52. (Persian)
  6. Seymour, K. E., Mostofsky, S. H., & Rosch, K. S. (2016). Cognitive load differentially impacts response control in girls and boys with ADHD. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 44, 141-154.
  7. Sharifmusavi, F.(2022). The Relationship Between Executive Functions with Family cohesion, Positive Youth Development and Emotional Maturity among Adolescence: The Mediating Role of Emotional Regulation. Journal title, 10 (2) , 101-118 URL: http://jcp.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3489-fa.html
  8. Sandford, J. A., Fine, A. H., & Goldman, L. (1995). A comparison of auditory and visual processing in children with ADHD using the IVA Continuous Performance Test. In annual convention of CHADD, Washington, DC.
  9. Simani, L., Roozbeh, M., Rostami, M., Pakdaman, H., Ramezani, M., & Asadollahi, M. (2020). Attention and inhibitory control deficits in patients with genetic generalized epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizure. Epilepsy & Behavior, 102, 106672.
  10. Shabahang, A., Abedanzadeh, R., & Ramezanzadeh, H. (2022). The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Inhibitory Control and interference Control in Athletes and Non-athletes. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 184-192.
  11. Thomson, P., Vijayakumar, N., Johnson, K. A., Malpas, C. B., Sciberras, E., Efron, D., Hazell, P., & Silk, T. J. (2020). Longitudinal trajectories of sustained attention development in children and adolescents with ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 48(12), 1529–1542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00698-5
  12. Vaughan, R. S., Hagyard, J. D., Brimmell, J., & Edwards, E. J. (2021). The effect of trait emotional intelligence on working memory across athletic expertise. Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(6), 629-637.

 

  1. Vaughan, R. S., & Laborde, S. (2021). Attention, working-memory control, working-memory capacity, and sports performance: The moderating role of athletic expertise. European journal of sports science, 21(2), 240-249.
  2. Weidler, C., Habel, U., Wallheinke, P., Wagels, L., Hofhansel, L., Ling, S., ... & Clemens, B. (2022). Consequences of prefrontal tDCS on inhibitory control and reactive aggression. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 17(1), 120-130.
  3. Wimmer, R. D., Schmitt, L. I., Davidson, T. J., Nakajima, M., Deisseroth, K., & Halassa, M. M. (2015). Thalamic control of sensory selection in divided attention. Nature, 526(7575), 705-709.
  4. Wu, C. H., Nien, J. T., Lin, C. Y., Nien, Y. H., Kuan, G., Wu, T. Y., ... & Chang, Y. K. (2021). Relationship between mindfulness, psychological skills, and mental toughness in college athletes. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(13), 6802.