ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخة فارسی مقیاس تجدیدنظر‌شدة انگیزش ورزشی در دانشجویان ورزشکار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد خوراسگان، اصفهان، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، ارزیابی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخة فارسی مقیاس تجدیدنظرشدة انگیزش ورزشی در دانشجویان ورزشکار بود. شرکت‌کنندگان این پژوهش، شامل 503 دانشجوی ورزشکار از دانشگاه های ارومیه بودند که با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی خوشه‌ای انتخاب شدند نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی،  با حذف یک گویه از خرده مقیاس تنظیمات درون‌فکنی‌شده، برازش مدل شش عاملی مقیاس را برای داده‌ها تایید کرد. همبستگی بالای خرده مقیاس‌های همسان مقیاس تجدیدنظرشدة انگیزش ورزشی و پرسش‌نامة تنظیمات رفتاری در ورزش، روایی ملاکی مناسب مقیاس را نشان داد. نتایج آلفای کرونباخ همسانی درونی قابل‌قبول خرده مقیاس‌ها را نشان داد. در کل، یافته‌ها بیانگر آن است که با حذف یک گویه از خرده مقیاس تنظیمات درون‌فکنی شده، نسخة فارسی مقیاس تجدیدنظرشدة انگیزش ورزشی را می توان برای سنجش انگیزش ورزشی در دانشجویان ورزشکار استفاده نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the Revised Sport Motivation Scale among Athlete University Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Malek Ahmadi 1
  • Mahdi Namazizadeh 2
  • Pouneh Mokhtari 3
1 Assistance Professor, Department of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The aim of present research was to evaluate the psychometric properties of Persian version of the revised sport motivation scale in athlete university students. Participants in this research included 503 athlete university students were selected through cluster random sampling method from universities of Urmia. Confirmatory factor analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha coefficient methods were used to analyze data. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed fitness of the six-factor model for data after removing one item of the introjected regulation subscale. High correlations in the same subscales of the revised sport motivation scale and the behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire indicated appropriate criterion validity. Cronbach's alpha coefficients showed an acceptable internal consistency for all subscales. Overall, the findings suggest that Persian version of the revised sport motivation scale after removing one item of the introjected regulation subscale; can be used to assess the sport motivation in athlete university students.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Validity
  • Sport Motivation Scale
  • Athlete University Student
1. Ahmadi, M., Behzadnia, B., & Amani, J. (In press). Investigation of the Factor Structure of The Behavioral Regulation in Sport  Questionnaire (BRSQ-6) in University Athletes. Applied Research of Sport Management.
2. Ahmadi, M., Namazi Zade, M., & Behzadnia, B. (2014). The relationship between Basic psychological needs and indices of well-being (Eudaimonia and Hedonia) in physical activity of motional - physical disabled individuals. Journal of Sport Psychology Studies, 6, 95-104.
3. Chatzisarantis, N., Hagger, M. S., Biddle, S. J., Smith, B., & Wang, J. C. (2003). A meta-analysis of perceived locus of causality in exercise, sport, and physical education contexts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25(3), 284-306.
4. De Charms, R. (1968). Personal Causation: The International Affective Determinations of Behavior: Acad. Press.
5. Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol, 18(1), 105.
6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior: Springer Science & Business Media.
7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research: University Rochester Press.
9. Holland, M. J., Sharp, L., Woodcock, C., Cumming, J., & Duda, J. L. (2010). Validity and reliability of the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ) with youth athletes. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, s175-s176.
10. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
11. Kaliush, P. R. (2014). Disordered Eating in Female Collegiate Athletes: Investigating the Relationships Among Coaching and Parenting Styles, Psychological Needs, and Self-Determined Motivation.
12. Li, F., & Harmer, P. (1996). Testing the simplex assumption underlying the Sport Motivation Scale: A structural equation modeling analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport, 67(4), 396-405.
13. Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., Hargreaves, E. A., & Ng, J. Y. (2014). Comparing sport motivation scales: A response to Pelletier et al. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(5), 446-452.
14. Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Rose, E. A. (2008). The Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30(3), 323.
15. Mallett, C., Kawabata, M., & Newcombe, P. (2007). Progressing measurement in sport motivation with the SMS-6: A response to Pelletier, Vallerand, and Sarrazin. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 622-631.
16. Mallett, C., Kawabata, M., Newcombe, P., Otero-Forero, A., & Jackson, S. (2007). Sport motivation scale-6 (SMS-6): A revised six-factor sport motivation scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 600-614.
17. Martens, M. P., & Webber, S. N. (2002). Psychometric properties of the Sport Motivation Scale: An evaluation with college varsity athletes from the US. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24(3), 254-270.
18. Ntoumanis, N., & Standage, M. (2009). Motivation in physical education classes A self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 194-202.
19. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Briere, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 279-306.
20. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Briere, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35-35.
21. Pelletier, L. G., Rocchi, M. A., Vallerand, R. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 329-341.
22. Pelletier, L. G., Vallerand, R. J., & Sarrazin, P. (2007). The revised six-factor Sport Motivation Scale (Mallett, Kawabata, Newcombe, Otero-Forero, & Jackson, 2007): something old, something new, and something borrowed. Psychology of Sport andExercise, 8(5), 615-621.
23. Rocchi, M. A., Pelletier, L. G., & Couture, A. L. (2013). Determinants of coach motivation and autonomy supportive coaching behaviours. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(6), 852-859.
24. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
25. Sage, G. H. (1971). Introduction to motor behavior: A neuropsychological approach: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
26. Sarrazin, P., Boiché, J., & Pelletier, L. (2007). A self-determination theory approach to dropout in athletes. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport, 229-241.
27. Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 97.
28. Standage, M., & Treasure, D. C. (2002). Relationship among achievement goal orientations and multidimensional situational motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1), 87-103. doi: 10.1348/000709902158784
29. Viladrich, C., Appleton, P. R., Quested, E., Duda, J. L., Alcaraz, S., Heuzé, J.-P., . . 30. Hill, A. P. (2013). Measurement invariance of the Behavioural Regulation in Sport Questionnaire when completed by young athletes across five European countries. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(4), 384-394.
31. Viladrich, C., Torregrosa, M., & Cruz, J. (2011). Calidad psicométrica de la adaptación española del Cuestionario de Regulación Conductual en el Deporte. Psicothema, 23(4), 786-794.
32. Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus: John Wiley & Sons.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychological review, 66(5), 297.
33. Zahariadis, P. N., Tsorbatzoudis, H., & Grouios, G. (2005). The sport motivation scale for children: preliminary analysis inphysical education classes 1, 2. Perceptual and motor skills, 101(1), 43-54.