نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه فردوسی

2 استاد گروه رفتار حرکتی دانشکده علوم ورزشی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

3 دانشیار گروه رفتار حرکتی دانشکده علوم ورزشی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

4 استادیار گروه مهندسی پزشکی. دانشکده فنی مهندسی دانشگاه آزاد واحد مشهد

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف مقایسه تأثیر دو‌ نوع پروتکل نوروفیدبک بر یادگیری مهارت حرکتی‌تعقیبی انجام شد. بدین‌منظور 42 نفر در قالب سه گروه "کاهش‌آلفا"، "افزایش‌تتا" و کنترل قرار گرفتند. در گروه " کاهش‌آلفا"، هدف کاهش دامنة آلفا در منطقه قشر حرکتی قبل از شروع تمرین مهارت و در گروه " افزایش‌تتا" هدف افزایش دامنة تتا در منطقه آهیانه‌ای بلافاصله بعد از اتمام تمرین مهارت بود. سپس افراد در آزمون‌های یادداری با وقفه‌های 90 دقیقه، 24 ساعت و یک هفته بعد شرکت نمودند. نتایج نشان داد در آزمون یادداری اول گروه "کاهش‌آلفا" عملکرد بهتری نسبت به گروه کنترل داشت. هرچند این برتری در آزمون‌های یادداری دوم و سوم معنادار نبود. یافته‌های حاضر نشان می‌دهند با بازداری آلفا و متعاقب آن افزایش تحریک پذیری در منطقه قشر حرکتی می‌توان آثار مفیدی در یادگیری یک مهارت حرکتی ایجاد نمود هر چند پایداری این اثر در طول زمان نیاز به مطالعات بیشتری دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The comparison of effects of Alpha suppression and Theta enhancement neurofeedback protocols on learning a pursuit tracking task

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammadreza Ghasemian moghadam 1
  • hamidreza Taheri 2
  • Alireza Saberi Kakhki 3
  • majid Ghoshuni 4

1

2

3

4

چکیده [English]

This study aimed to compare the effect of two neurofeedback protocols on learning a pursuit tracking task. Forty-two volunteers placed in three groups of alpha-suppression, theta-enhancement and control. In the alpha-suppression group, alpha amplitude suppressed at C4 before the training, while the participants in the theta-enhancement intended to increase theta amplitude at Pz and immediately after training. After training session, the subjects participated in retention tests within 90 minutes, 24 hours, and one week intervals. The results showed that the alpha-suppression group performed better than control group in the first retention test. Nevertheless, this superiority was not significant in subsequent retention tests, where no difference was observed between the groups. These findings revealed that the inhibition of alpha range in the motor cortex and subsequent higher excitability can likely leave beneficial effects on learning a motor skill, even though the sustainability of this effect over time needs to more studies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Neurofeedback
  • Motor Learning
  • Memory Consolidation

1. Albouy, G., Sterpenich, V., Vandewalle, G., Darsaud, A., Gais, S., Rauchs, G., Balteau, E. (2013). Interaction between hippocampal and striatal systems predicts subsequent consolidation of motor sequence memory. PLoS One, 8(3), e59490.
2. Antal, A., Nitsche, M. A., Kincses, T. Z., Kruse, W., Hoffmann, K. P., & Paulus, W. (2004). Facilitation of visuo‐motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19.2888-2892,(10).
3. Arent, S. M., & Landers, D. M. (2003). Arousal, anxiety, and performance: A reexamination of the inverted-U hypothesis. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 74(4), 436-444.
4. Boggio, P. S., Castro, L. O., Savagim, E. A., Braite, R., Cruz, V. C., Rocha, R. R., . . . Fregni, F. (2006). Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscience letters, 404(1), 232-236.
5. Boyd, L. A., & Linsdell, M. A. (2009). Excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to left dorsal premotor cortex enhances motor consolidation of new skills. BMC neuroscience, 10(1), 72.
6. Catalano, J. F. (1978). The effect of rest following massed practice of continuous and discrete motor tasks. Journal of motor behavior, 10(1), 63-67.
7. Chauvette, S. (2013). Slow-wave sleep: Generation and propagation of slow waves, role in long-term plasticity and gating. Université Laval.
8. Gruzelier, J. H. (2013). EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. I: A review of cognitive and affective outcome in healthy participants. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 44, 124-141.
منابع
9. Gruzelier, J. H. (2014). EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. I: A review of cognitive and affective outcome in healthy participants. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 124-141.
10.Hammond, D. C. (2007). Neurofeedback for the enhancement of athletic performance and physical balance. The Journal of the American Board of Sport Psychology, 1(1), 1-9.
11. Hill, H. (2014). Modulation of frontal and parietal neuronal activity by visuomotor learning. An ERP analysis of implicit and explicit pursuit tracking tasks. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 91(3), 212-224.
12. Kropotov, J. (2010). Quantitative EEG, event-related potentials and neurotherapy: Academic Press.
13. Landers, D. M., Petruzzello, S. J., Salazar, W., Crews, D. J., Kubitz, K. A., Gannon, T. L., & Han, M. (1991). The influence of electrocortical biofeedback on performance in pre-elite archers Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 23 (1).
14. Landers, D. M., Petruzzello, S. J., Salazar, W., Crews, D. J., Kubitz, K. A., Gannon, T. L., & Han, M. (1991). The influence of electrocortical biofeedback on performance in pre-elite archers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
15. Luft, A. R., Buitrago, M. M., Ringer, T., Dichgans, J., & Schulz, J. B. (2004). Motor skill learning depends on protein synthesis in motor cortex after training. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24. (29), 6515-6520.
16. Nieuwenhuis, I. L., & Takashima, A. (2011). The role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in memory consolidation. Behavioural brain research, 218(2), 325-334.
17. Nitsche, M. A., Schauenburg, A., Lang, N., Liebetanz, D., Exner, C., Paulus, W., & Tergau, F. (2003). Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 15(4), 619-626.
18. Rauchs, G., Desgranges, B., Foret, J., & Eustache, F. (2005). The relationships between memory systems and sleep stages. Journal of sleep research, 14(2), 123-140.
19. Reiner, M., Rozengurt, R., & Barnea, A. (2014). Better than sleep: Theta neurofeedback training accelerates memory consolidation. Biological psychology, 95, 45-53.
20. Reis, J., Schambra, H. M., Cohen, L. G., Buch, E. R., Fritsch, B., Zarahn, E., Krakauer, J. W. (2009). Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(5), 1590-1595.
21. Robertson, E. M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Miall, R. C. (2004). Current concepts in procedural consolidation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(7), 576-582.
22. Ros, T., Munneke, M., Parkinson, L., & Gruzelier, J. (2014). Neurofeedback facilitation of implicit motor learning. Biological psychology, 95, 54-58.
23. Ros, T., Munneke, M. A., Ruge, D., Gruzelier, J. H., & Rothwell, J. C. (2010). Endogenous control of waking brain rhythms induces neuroplasticity in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 31(4), 770-778.
24. Rosenkranz, K., Kacar, A., & Rothwell, J. C. (2007). Differential modulation of motor cortical plasticity and excitability in early and late phases of human motor learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(44), 12058-12066.
25. Vernon, D. (2005). Can Neurofeedback Training Enhance Performance?An Evaluation of the Evidence with Implications for Future Research. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 30(4), 347-364.