مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

در باره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

داوران

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

هزینه های دریافتی نشریه

راهنمای نگارش مقاله

فرم ها

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

روان سنجی نسخۀ فارسی جدول بازنگری شده عواطف ورزشی: تمایز انگیختگی از اضطراب شناختی در مدل فاجعه

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه الزهرا (س)

2 استاد فیزیولوژی روانی حرکات اختیاری انسان، دانشگاه جامع امام‌حسین‌(ع)

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخة فارسی "جدول سنجش عواطفورزشیبازنگری‌شده" که ابزاری کارآمد جهت سنجش احساس انگیختگی و اضطراب شناختی و تمایز آن‌ها در چهارچوب مدل فاجعه محسوب می‌شود، انجام گرفت.‌ بدین‌منظور، 218 ورزشکار (102 مرد و 116 زن) در دو سطح مهارتی ماهر (96 نفر) و کم‌تجربه (122 نفر) در پنج رشتة ورزشی (تیروکمان، تنیس روی میز، بدمینتون، بسکتبال و والیبال) به‌صورت هدفمند انتخاب شدند و سه پرسش‌نامة "جدول سنجش عواطف ورزشی بازنگری‌شده"، "اضطراب حالتی رقابتی ـ2" و "اضطراب رقابت ورزشی" را پیش از شروع مسابقه تکمیل نمودند. شایان‌ذکر است که روایی صوری و ‌محتوایی (91/0) و پایایی زمانی (از طریق ضریب هم‌بستگی درون‌طبقه‌ای به روش آزمون ـ آزمون مجدد برای مؤلفة انگیختگی=77/0و اضطراب شناختی=86/0)‌ تأیید گردید. روایی هم‌گرا، افتراقی و هم‌زمان نیز توسط ضریب هم‌بستگی پیرسون تأیید شد و روایی سازه توسط آزمون تی گروه‌های مستقل مورد تأیید قرار گرفت؛ ‌بنابراین، نسخة فارسی این ابزار دارای ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی معتبر جهت اندازه‌گیری احساس انگیختگی و اضطراب شناختی ورزشکاران پیش از مسابقه می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of Sport Grid-Revised: Distinguishing Arousal from Cognitive Anxiety in Disaster Theory

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Abdolshahi 1
  • Seyed Mohammad Kazem Vaez Moosavi 2

1 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Alzahra University

2 Professor of Psychophysiology of Voluntary Human Movement, Imam Hossein University

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of Persian version of Revised Sport Grid, which is an effective tool to assess physiologic arousal and cognitive anxiety and their distinguishing in the framework of disaster theory. Therefore,two hundreds and eighteen athletes with two levels of skill, skilled (96 persons), less-experience (122 persons) in five sport types (Archery, TableTennis,Badminton,Basketball & Volleyball), were selected by goal oriented sampling and completed the Revised Sport Grid, Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 and Sport Competition Anxiety test questionnaire. We confirmed the face validity, content validity (0.91) and temporal reliability (with use of intra-class correlation coefficient in test-retest method, arousal=0.77, cognitive anxiety=0.86). The convergent, discriminant and concurrent validity were confirmed by Pearson correlation coefficient, and the construct validity was confirmed by independent t test. Therefore, the Persian version of Revised Sport Grid has psychometric properties for measuring the athletes’ arousal and cognitive anxiety immediately before competition.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Arousal
  • Anxiety
  • Validity
  • Reliability
  • Disaster Theory
مراجع
  1. Baumgartner, T., & Jakson, A. (1991). Measurment for evaluation in phisical education and exercise science (H. Sepasi & P. Noorbakhsh, Trans‌). Tehran: Samt Pub, First pub. (In Persian).
2. Cox, R. H., Russell, W. D., & Robb, M. (1998). Development of a CSAI-2 short form for assessing competitive state anxiety during and immediately prior to competition. Journal of Sport Behavior, 21(1), 30.‌
3. Durr, K., & Cox, R. (1997). Relationship between state anxiety and performance in high school divers: A test of catastrophe theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68,(1), Supplement abstract 102.
4. Edwards, T., & Hardy, L. (1996). The interactive effects of intensity and direction of cognitive and somatic anxiety and self-confidence upon performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18(3), 296-312.
5. Farokhi, A., & Hakkak, E. (2000). Comparision of competitive state and trait anxiety between male athletes. Harekat, 4, 55-62 . (In Persian).
6. Farokhi, A., Moteshareei, E., & Zeid Abadi, R. (2013). Factorial validity and  reliability‌ Farsi BRUMS mood scale questionair. Motor Behavior, 5(13), 15-40. (In Persian).
7. Fazey, J., & Hardy, L. (1988). The inverted-U hypothesis:A catastrophe for sport psychology. British Association of Sports Sciences.Monograph, 1, Leeds, UK: National Coaching Foundation.
8. Gill, D. L. (2000). Psychological dynamicsof sport and exercise (N. Khajevand, Trans‌). ‌Tehran: Kosar, First pub., Pp 278. (In Persian).
9. Gould, D., & Krane, V. (1992). The arousal–athleticperformance relationship: Currentstatusandfuturedirections. Human Kinetics Publishers; 121-125
10. Hanin, Y. L. (1995). Individual zones of optimal functioning (IZOF) model: An idiographic approach to performance anxiety. Sport Psychology: An Analysis of Athlete Behavior, 3, 103-19.
11. Hardy, L. (1990). A catastrophe model of performance in sport. In J. G. Jones &Hardy (Eds.),Stress and Performance in Sport‌ (Pp. 81-106‌).
12. Hardy, L. (1996 a). Testing the predictions of the cusp catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. Sport Psychologist, 10, 140-‌56.
13. Hardy, L. (1996 b). A test of catastrophe models of anxiety and sports performance against multidimensional anxiety theory models using the method of dynamic differences. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 9(1), 69-86.
14. Hardy, L., & Parfitt, G. (1991). A catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. British Journal of Psychology, 82(2), 163-78.
15. Hardy, L., Parfitt, G., & Pates, J. (1994). Performance catastrophes in sport: A test of the hysteresis hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 12(4), 327-34.
16. Janelle, C. M., Singer, R. N., & Williams, A. M. (1999). External distraction and attentional narrowing: Visual search evidence. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,21(1), 70-91.
17. Jones, G., Swain, A., & Hardy, L. (1993). Intensity and direction dimensions of competitive state anxiety and relationships with performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 11(6), 525-‌32.
18. Krane, V., Joyce, D., & Rafeld, J. (1994). Competitive anxiety, situation criticality, and softball performance. Sport Psychologist, 8, 58‌.
19. Martens, R. (1977). Sport competition anxiety test. Champaign, IL, England: Human Kinetics.
20. Martens, R., Burton, D., Vealey, R. S., Bump,‌ L. A., & Smith, D. E. (1990). Development and validation of the competitive state anxiety inventory-2. Competitive Anxiety in Sport, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 90-117.
21. Mayer, J. D., & Gaschke, Y. N. (1988). The experience and meta-experience of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 102.
22. Mohammadbeigi, A., Mohammadsalehi, N., Aligol, M. (2015). Validity and reliability of the instruments and types of measurments in health applied researches. J RafsanjanUnivMed Sci,13(10), 1153-70. (In Persian).
23. Mohsenpoor, F. (2002). Comparison of sportcompetitive staiteanxiety between team and individualmenathlete in khuzestan schools‌. (Unpublished master dissertation).‌ Ahvaz, Chamran University. (In Persion).
24. Murphy, S., Greenspan, M., Jowdy, D., & Tammen, V. (1989). Development of a brief rating instrument of competitive anxiety: Comparison with the CSAI-2. Paper presented at the meeting of the association for the advancement of applied sport psychology. Seattle, WA.
25. Oxendine, J. B. (1970). Emotional arousal and motor performance. Quest, 13(1), 23-32.
26. Parfitt, C., Jones, J. G., Hardy, L. (1990). Multidimensional anxiety and performance. In L.G. Jones & L. Hardy (Eds.), Stress and performance in sport (pp. 43–80). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
27. Raedeke, T., Stein, G., & Schmidt, G. (1993). A new look at arousal: A two-dimensionalconceptualization. North American Society for the psychology of sport and physical activity, Brainerd, MN.
28. Raedeke, T. D., & Stein, G. L. (1994). Felt arousal, thoughts/ feelings, and ski performance. Sport Psychologist,8, 360-375.
29. Roberts, G., Spink, K., & Pemberton, C. (1999). Learning experiencesin sport psychology (M. Vaez Mousavi & M. Shojaee, Trans). Tehran: Roshd Pub, First pub, Pp 120. (In Persion).
30. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-78.
31. Russell, J. A., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journalof personality and social psychology, 57(3), 493.
32. Thayer, R. E. (1967). Measurement of activation through self-report monograph aupplement 1-V20. Psychological Reports, 20(2), 663-78.
33. Thayer, R. E. (1970). Activation states as assessed by verbal report and four psychophysiological variables. Psychophysiology, 7(1), 86-94.
34. Vaez Mousavi, S. M. K., & Mosayebi, F. (2007‌). Sport Psycology. Tehran: Samt Pub, First pub. (In Persian).
35. Vahida, F., & Zamani, A. (2012). Comparison of cognitive and somatic anxiety between men and women athletes in different levels of competition. Faslname Takhasosi Olume Ejtemae Daneshgah Azad Shushtar,18(6), 23-40. (In Persian).
36. Ward, D. G., & Cox, R. H. (2004). The sport grid-revised as a measure of felt arousal and cognitive anxiety. Journal of Sport Behavior, 27(1), 93-107‌.
37. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219.
مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی
دوره 6، شماره 20
مرداد 1396
صفحه 49-72
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 26 فروردین 1395
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 15 تیر 1395
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 28 تیر 1395
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار