تاثیر فشار نظارت بر تصمیم‌گیری و ارتباط آن با بازپردازش ویژۀ تصمیم در ورزشکاران ماهر تنیس روی میز

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
محمد سلیمانی راد 1
شهزاد طهماسبی بروجنی 2
علی اکبر جابری مقدم 3
مهدی شهبازی 4
1 دانشجوی دکترای یادگیری حرکتی دانشگاه تهران
2 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه تهران
3 استادیار رفتار حرکتی دانشگاه تهران
4 دانشیار و مدیر بخش یادگیری و کنترلر حرکتی دانشگاه تهران
10.22089/spsyj.2017.4383.1458
چکیده
هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی تصمیم‌گیری تحت فشار نظارت و ارتباط آن با بازپردازش تصمیم بود. آزمودنی‌ها 25 ورزشکار ماهر تنیس روی میز بودند که در آن یک تکلیف شبیه‌سازی تصمیم‌گیری تنیس روی میز تحت شرایط فشار کم و فشار نظارت را در دو بلوک به شیوة ایجاد گزینه اجرا کردند. هم‌چنین از نسخة فارسی مقیاس بازپردازش ویژة تصمیم و نسخۀ فارسی سیاهۀ اضطراب حالتی رقابتی-2 استفاده شد. نتایج تحلیل واریانس چندمتغیره با اندازه‌گیری مکرر نشان داد اثر فشار بر اضطراب شناختی معنادار بود. همچنین نتایج نشان داد تفاوت معناداری بین برخی از متغیرهای تصمیم‌گیری شامل کیفیّت گزینة اول، ناهمسانی پویا و زمان انتخاب گزینه‌ها تحت فشار کم و فشار نظارت وجود دارد. بازپردازش تصمیم تنها توانست تغییرات کیفیّت گزینة اول را پیش‌بینی کند. لذا، پیشنهاد می‌شود مربیان و ورزشکاران شناخت مناسبی از شرایط متفاوت فشار داشته باشند و ورزشکاران ماهر از تمایلات خودتمرکزی تحت فشار پرهیز کنند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تنیس روی میز
تصمیم گیری
فشار نظارت
بازپردازش
ورزشکار

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Effect of Monitoring Pressure on Decision Making and Relate it to Decision Specific Reinvestment on Expert Ping-Pong Players

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Soleimanirad 1
Shahzad Tahmasebi Boroujeni 2
Ali Akbar Jaberi Moqadam 3
Mehdi Shahbazi 4
1 Phd Student in Motor Learning, University of Tehran
2 Assistant Prof. University of Tehran
3 Assistant Professor in Motor Behavior, University of Tehran
4 Associate Professor in Motor Behavior, University of Tehran
چکیده English

The purpose of present study was to investigate monitoring pressure on decision making and relate it to decision specific reinvestment. Subjects were 25 expert Ping-Pong players in which they performed a Ping-Pong simulated decision making task using option generation method under two conditions of low and monitoring pressure. Also, the Persian version of decision specific reinvestment scale and competitive sport anxiety inventory-2 were used. Results of multivariate analysis of variance with repeated measure revealed that pressure had a significant effect on cognitive anxiety (P≤0.05). Also, the results revealed that there were significant differences between some decision-making variables including first option quality, dynamic inconsistency and generation time under low and monitoring pressure (P≤0.05). Decision reinvestment only could predict the first option quality changes. Thus coaches and athletes are offered to have knowledge about the different pressure conditions and expert athletes to avoid the self-focus intentions under pressure.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Ping-Pong
Decision Making
Monitoring Pressure
Reinvestment
Athlete
  1. Asgari, Z., & Abdoli, B. (2014). Investigate the relationship between reinvestment and sport performance under psychological pressure: examination of reinvestment theory. Motor Behavior, 6(16), 29-42. [In persian].
  2. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in experimental social psychology, 19, 1-40.
  3. Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 46(3), 610.
  4. Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? Journal of experimental psychology: General, 130(4), 701.
  5. Beilock, S. L., Kulp, C. A., Holt, L. E., & Carr, T. H. (2004). More on the fragility of performance: choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 584.
  6. Belletier, C., Davranche, K., Tellier, I. S., Dumas, F., Vidal, F., Hasbroucq, T., & Huguet, P. (2015). Choking under monitoring pressure: being watched by the experimenter reduces executive attention. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 22(5), 1410-1416.
  7. Bootsma, R. J., & Van Wieringen, P. C. (1990). Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 16(1), 21.
    1. Bray, S. R., Martin, K. A., & Widmeyer, W. N. (2000). The relationship between evaluative concerns and sport competition state anxiety among youth skiers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(5), 353-361.
    2. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(3), 324.
    3. DeCaro, M. S., Thomas, R. D., Albert, N. B., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Choking under pressure: multiple routes to skill failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 390.
    4. Englert, C., & Oudejans, R. R. (2014). Is Choking under Pressure a Consequence of Skill-Focus or Increased Distractibility? Results from a Tennis Serve Task. Psychology, 2014.
    5. Geukes, K., Mesagno, C., Hanrahan, S. J., & Kellmann, M. (2013). Performing under pressure in private: Activation of self-focus traits. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 11-23.
    6. Gucciardi, D. F., & Dimmock, J. A. (2008). Choking under pressure in sensorimotor skills: Conscious processing or depleted attentional resources? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(1), 45-59.
    7. Hepler, T. J., & Feltz, D. L. (2012). Take the first heuristic, self-efficacy, and decision-making in sport. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 154.
    8. Jackson, R. C., Ashford, K. J., & Norsworthy, G. (2006). Attentional focus, dispositional reinvestment, and skilled motor performance under pressure. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 28(1), 49-68.
  8. Jackson, R. C., Kinrade, N. P., Hicks, T., & Wills, R. (2013). Individual propensity for reinvestment: field-based evidence for the predictive validity of three scales. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 44(4), 331-350.
  9. Johnson, J. G., & Raab, M. (2003). Take the first: Option-generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 215-229.
  10. Kinrade, N. P., Jackson, R. C., & Ashford, K. J. (2010). Dispositional reinvestment and skill failure in cognitive and motor tasks. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(4), 312-319.
  11. Kinrade, N. P., Jackson, R. C., & Ashford, K. J. (2015). Reinvestment, task complexity and decision making under pressure in basketball. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 20, 11-19.
  12. Kinrade, N. P., Jackson, R. C., Ashford, K. J., & Bishop, D. T. (2010). Development and validation of the decision-specific reinvestment scale. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(10), 1127-1135.
  13. Laborde, S., Dosseville, F., & Kinrade, N. P. (2014). Decision-specific reinvestment scale: An exploration of its construct validity, and association with stress and coping appraisals. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(3), 238-246.
  14. Laborde, S., Furley, P., & Schempp, C. (2015). The relationship between working memory, reinvestment, and heart rate variability. Physiology & behavior, 139, 430-436.
  15. Laborde, S., Musculus, L., Kalicinski, M., Klämpfl, M. K., Kinrade, N. P., & Lobinger, B. H. (2015). Reinvestment: Examining convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity using psychometric and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 77-87.
  16. Laborde, S., & Raab, M. (2013). The tale of hearts and reason: the influence of mood on decision making. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 35(4), 339-357.
  17. Masters, R. S., & Maxwell, J. P. (2004). Implicit motor learning, reinvestment and movement disruption: what you don't know won't hurt you? In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodge (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 207-228). London, UK: Routledge.
  18. Maxwell, J., Masters, R., & Poolton, J. (2006). Performance breakdown in sport: the roles of reinvestment and verbal knowledge. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77(2), 271-276.
  19. Mehrsafar A, Khabiri M, & Moghadam Zadeh A. (in press). Factorial validity and reliability of Persian version of Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) in intensity, direction and frequency dimensions. Motor development-learning [In persion].
  20. Mesagno, C., Harvey, J. T., & Janelle, C. M. (2011). Self-presentation origins of choking: Evidence from separate pressure manipulations. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(3), 441.
  21. Otten, M. P. (2009). Choking vs. clutch performance: A study of sport performance under pressure. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31, 583-601.
  22. Oudejans, R. R., Kuijpers, W., Kooijman, C. C., & Bakker, F. C. (2011). Thoughts and attention of athletes under pressure: skill-focus or performance worries? Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 24(1), 59-73.
  23. Pijpers, J., Oudejans, R. R., & Bakker, F. C. (2005). Anxiety-induced changes in movement behaviour during the execution of a complex whole-body task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(3), 421-445.
  24. Poolton, J., Siu, C. M., & Masters, R. (2011). The home team advantage gives football referees something to ruminate about. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 6(4), 545-552.
  25. Raab, M., & Johnson, J. G. (2007). Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(3), 158.
  26. Smeeton, N. J., Williams, A. M., Hodges, N. J., & Ward, P. (2005). The relative effectiveness of various instructional approaches in developing anticipation skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(2), 98.
  27. Soleimanirad, M., Tahmasebi Boroujeni, S., & Mehrsafar, A. (In Press). Psychometric Propertiesof Persian Version of Movement- and Decision -Specific Reinvestment Scales. Sport Psychology Studies.[In Persian].
  28. Tanaka, Y., & Sekiya, H. (2010). The influence of audience and monetary reward on the putting kinematics of expert and novice golfers. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 81(4), 416-424.
  29. Vealey, R. S., Low, W., Pierce, S., & Quinones-Paredes, D. (2014). Choking in Sport: ACT on It! Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 5(3), 156-169.
  30. Wang, J., Marchant, D., Morris, T., & Gibbs, P. (2004). Self-consciousness and trait anxiety as predictors of choking in sport. Journal of science and medicine in sport, 7(2), 174-185.

 

مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی
دوره 7، شماره 26
بهمن 1397
صفحه 1-18

  • تاریخ دریافت 01 تیر 1396
  • تاریخ بازنگری 22 آبان 1396
  • تاریخ پذیرش 10 دی 1396