نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد دهاقان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دهاقان، ایران
2 گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه تبریز، ایران
چکیده
هدف از این پژوهش بررسی مشابهت و یا تفاوت مکانیسم‌های زیربنایی تمرین جسمانی و ذهنی بود. به این منظور 60 نفر در این پژوهش شرکت کردند که به‌صورت تصادفی به سه گروه تمرین جسمانی، تمرین جسمانی و تصویرسازی بخشبخش و تمرین جسمانی و تصویرسازی کل تقسیم شدند. تکلیف هدف در این پژوهش یک برنامه ژیمناستیک بود. این‌گونه استدلال شد که اگر تمرین جسمانی و تصویرسازی مکانیسم‌های مشابهی داشته باشند باید تمرین ذهنی بخشبخش نسبت به تمرین ذهنی کل منجر به یادگیری بهتری برای این تکلیف گردد. بر اساس گروهبندی ذکرشده شرکت کنندگان به مدت دو روز (هر روز 40 کوشش) به تمرین پرداختند. 72 ساعت بعد آزمون یادداری انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که تمرین ذهنی بخشبخش نسبت به تمرین ذهنی کل اثربخشی بیشتری برای یادگیری این تکلیف دارد و عملکرد گروه تصویرسازی کل نسبت به تمرین جسمانی محض ضعیف تر بود. این نتایج نشان‌دهنده مشابه بودن مکانیسم‌های زیربنایی تمرین جسمانی و ذهنی هستند
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Addressing the Similarity and Differences of Physical and Mental Practice
نویسندگان [English]
- Azam Fathizadan 1
- Nazli Ilchizadeh 2
1 Department of Physical Education, Dehaghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan, Iran
2 Department of Motor Behavior, The University of Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this study was to examine the similarity and/or differences of underlying mechanisms of physical and mental practice. For this purpose, 60 persons were participated in this study which randomly divided into three physical practice, physical practice and mental part practice, and physical practice and whole mental practice groups. The goal task in this study was a gymnastic routine. It was argued that if physical practice and mental practice have similar underlying mechanisms then mental part practice should be more effective for learning this task than whole mental practice. According to the grouping, participants practiced the task for two days (40 trials each). 72 hours later retention test was performed. Results showed that the mental part practice was more effective for learning this task than mental whole practice and performance of this group was lower than pure physical practice group. These results showed the similarity of underlying mechanisms of physical and mental practice
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Physical Practice
- Mental Practice
- Gymnastic
2. Calmels, C., Holmes, P., Lopez, E., & Naman, V. (2006). Chronometric comparison of actual and imaged complex movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38(5), 339-348.
3. Cerritelli, B., Maruff, P., Wilson, P., & Currie, J. (2000). The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions. Behavioural brain research, 108(1), 91-96.
4. Coelho, C. J., Nusbaum, H. C., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Fenn, K. M. (2012). Imagined actions aren't just weak actions: Task variability promotes skill learning in physical practice but not in mental practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1759.
5. Dana, A., Shams, A., Allafan, N. Bahrami, AR. (2021). The relationship between attention and static balance disturbance in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci, 42, 5107–5115.
6. Debarnot, U., Maley, L., De Rossi, D., & Guillot, A. (2010). Motor interference does not impair the memory consolidation of imagined movements. Brain and cognition, 74(1), 52-57.
7. Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(5), 172-178.
8. Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitt's law hold in motor imagery? Behavioural brain research, 72(1-2), 127-134.
9. Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of applied psychology, 79(4), 481.
10. Eagles, J. S., Carlsen, A. N., & MacKinnon, C. D. (2015). Neural processes mediating the preparation and release of focal motor output are suppressed or absent during imagined movement. Experimental Brain Research, 233(5), 1625-1637.
11. Fontana, F. E., Furtado Jr, O., Mazzardo, O., & Gallagher, J. D. (2009). Whole and part practice: a meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109(2), 517-530.
12. Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212-22.
13. Guillot, A., Di Rienzo, F., MacIntyre, T., Moran, A., & Collet, C. (2012). Imagining is not doing but involves specific motor commands: a review of experimental data related to motor inhibition. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6(1), 247.
14. Guillot, A., Lebon, F., Rouffet, D., Champely, S., Doyon, J., & Collet, C. (2007). Muscular responses during motor imagery as a function of muscle contraction types. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 66(1), 18-27.
15. Hodges, N. J., Ong, N. T., Larssen, B. C., & Lim, S. B. (2011). What Observation of Motor Skills Does and Does Not Teach Us. Paper presented at the BIO Web of Conferences.
16. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14(11), 101-109.
17. Kunz, B. R., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Thompson, W. B. (2009). Evidence for motor simulation in imagined locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1458.
18. MacIntyre, T. E., Madan, C. R., Moran, A. P., Collet, C., & Guillot, A. (2018). Motor imagery, performance and motor rehabilitation. Progress In Brain Research, 240, 141-159.
19. McCormick, S. A., Causer, J., & Holmes, P. S. (2013). Active vision during action execution, observation and imagery: evidence for shared motor representations. PLoS One, 8(6), e67761.
20. McDermott, P., Carolan, T., Gacy, M., Fisher, A., & Gronowski, M. (2012). Cost Effective Approaches to Training Reconnaissance Tasks on Unmanned Systems. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 12(4), 18-25.
21. Munzert, J., Blischke, K., & Krüger, B. (2015). Motor imagery of locomotion with an additional load: actual load experience does not affect differences between physical and mental durations. Experimental brain research, 233(3), 809-816.
22. Naito, E., Kochiyama, T., Kitada, R., Nakamura, S., Matsumura, M., Yonekura, Y., & Sadato, N. (2002). Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical motor areas and the cerebellum. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(9), 3683-3691.
23. O’Shea, H., & Moran, A. (2016). Chronometric and pupil-size measurements illuminate the relationship between motor execution and motor imagery in expert pianists. Psychology of Music, 44(6), 1289-1303.
24. Ong, N. T., Larssen, B. C., & Hodges, N. J. (2012). In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming. Experimental brain research, 218(1), 9-19.
25. Reed, C. L. (2002). Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: Visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives. Memory & Cognition, 30(8), 1169-1178.
26. Schöllhorn, W., Oelenberg, M., & Michelbrink, M. (2007). Can mental training enhance the learning effect after differencial training? A Tennis Serve Task In: Theodorakis Y, Goudas M, Papaioannou A, editors. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th European Congress of Sport Psychology. Halkidiki: FEPSAC.
27. Shams, A., VaezMousavi, M., Aghdashipour, N. (2021). Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire for Children (MIQ-C). Sports Psychology, (1), 29-48.
28. Toussaint, L., & Blandin, Y. (2010). On the role of imagery modalities on motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(5), 497-504.
29. VaezMousavi M, Shams A. (2017). Mental Health of Iranian Elite Athletes. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 5 (3) :191-202.
)