مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی

مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی

نقش سیستم های مغزی رفتاری و عدم تقارن نیمکره ای در خلاقیت حرکتی نوجوانان

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران ایران.
2 کارشناس ارشد رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه الزهرا، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران.
3 دکتری تخصصی رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر، تعیین نقش سیستم های مغزی رفتاری و عدم تقارن نیمکره ای بر خلاقیت حرکتی در نوجوان بود.
موارد و روش‌ها: 239 دانش آموز دختر و پسر (با میانگین سنی0.6±15.4) به روش نمونه گیری هدفمند پرسشنامه های جمعیت شناختی، دست برتری ادینبرگ ویلیامز (1986) و سیستم‌های مغزی رفتاری کارو و وایت (1994) را تکمیل، سپس 207 نوجوان بر اساس معیارهای ورود به مطالعه انتخاب و با توجه به نمرات پرسشنامه های سیستم های مغزی رفتاری و دست برتری در گروه های راست برتر_فعال ساز (58 نوجوان)، راست برتر_ بازدارنده (64 نوجوان)، چپ برتر_ فعال ساز (37 نوجوان) و چپ برتر_ بازدارنده (48 نوجوان) قرار گرفتند. سپس آزمون خلاقیت حرکتی نوجوانان (مارتینز و فرنانندز ریو،2019) را اجرا کردند.
یافته ها: یافته های تحلیل واریانس چندمتغیره نشان داد نوجوانان با سیستم فعال ساز رفتاری در مقایسه با سیستم بازداری رفتاری دارای میانگین بالاتری در مولفه های روانی (P= 0/03)، ابتکار (P= 0/001)، انعطاف پذیری (P= 0/01) و خلاقیت حرکتی ((P=0/001 هستند. همچنین نوجوانان چپ برتر دارای میانگین بالاتری در مولفه های روانی، ابتکار، تخیل و خلاقیت حرکتی در مقایسه با نواجوان راست برتر بودند.
نتیجه گیری: افراد چپ برتر که نیمکره غالب آنها راست و دارای سیستم فعال ساز رفتاری می باشند دارای خلاقیت حرکتی بهتری نسبت به افراد راست برتر با سیستم مغزی رفتاری بازدار می باشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The role of behavioral brain systems and hemispheric asymmetry on motor creativity of adolescents

نویسندگان English

Parvaneh Shamsipour Dehkordi 1
maryam abdoshahi 1
Fatemeh Joodaki 2
mahtab heydari 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
3 PhD., Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of behavioral brain systems and hemispheric superiority on the motor creativity of teenagers.
Methods & Materials: 239 male and female students completed the Edinburgh Demographic Questionnaire and the Brain-Behavioral Systems Questionnaire by purposive sampling. Then, 207 teenagers with an average age of 15.4 were selected according to the criteria for entering the study, based on the scores of the questionnaires in the right superior-activating groups (58 teenagers), right superior-inhibiting (64 teenagers), left superior-activating (37 teenagers) and The upper left-inhibitor (48 teenagers) were placed. Then they performed the motor creativity test of teenagers (Martinez and Fernandez Rio, 2019).
Results: The findings of multivariate variance analysis showed that adolescents with behavioral activation system compared to behavioral inhibition system have a higher mean in psychological components (P=0.03), initiative, flexibility, movement creativity (P=0.001) Also, left superior teenagers had a higher average in psychological components, initiative, and motor creativity (P=0.001) compared to right superior teenagers.
Conclusion: Therefore, left-handed people whose dominant hemisphere is right and have a behavioral activation system have better movement creativity than right-handed people with an inhibited behavioral brain system.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

creativity
movement
psychology
initiative
flexibility
1.       Annett, J., Annett, M., Hudson, P. T. W., Turner, A. (1979). The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31(4), 641–652.
2.       Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529–550. 
3.       Barnett, K. J., Corballis, M. C. (2002). Ambidexterity and magical ideation. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 7(1), 75–84. 
4.       Beaty, R. E., Chen, Q., Christensen, A. P., Kenett, Y. N., Silvia, P. J., Benedek, M., Schacter, D. L. (2020). Default network contributions to episodic and semantic processing during divergent creative thinking: A representational similarity analysis. NeuroImage, 209, Article 116499. 
5.       Benedek, M., Fink, A. (2019). Toward a neurocognitive framework of creative cognition: The role of memory, attention, and cognitive control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 116–122. 
6.       Bournelli, P., Mountakis, E. (2008). Development of motor creativity in elementary school children and its retention. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 72–80.
7.       Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 730–737. 
8.       Carlsson, I., Wendt, P. E., Risberg, J. (2000). On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects. Neuropsychologia, 38(6), 873–885.
9.       Carson, R. G., Goodman, D., Elliott, D. (1992). Asymmetries in the discrete and pseudocontinuous regulation of visually guided reaching. Brain and Cognition, 18(2), 169–191. 
10.   Carver, C. S., White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
11.   Chen, Q., Beaty, R. E., Cui, Z., Sun, J., He, H., Zhuang, K., Qiu, J. (2019). Brain hemispheric involvement in visuospatial and verbal divergent thinking. NeuroImage, 202, Article 116065. 
12.   Clantr Qureshi, M., Ain Allahzadegan, R., Rezaei Kargar, F. (2012). Examining the relationship between creativity and general health in adolescents. Innovation and Creativity in Humanities, 2(3), 45–59.
13.   De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood–creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756. 
14.   Dennis, T. A., Chen, C. C. (2007). Neurophysiological mechanisms in the emotional modulation of attention: The interplay between threat sensitivity and attentional control. Biological Psychology, 76(1–2), 1–10.
15.   Dolcos, S., Hu, Y., Iordan, A. D., Moore, M., & Dolcos, F. (2016). Optimism and the brain: Trait optimism mediates the protective role of the orbitofrontal cortex gray matter volume against anxiety. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv106
16.   Dominguez, M., Paulino, F. F., & Silva, B. M. (2014). Between the sacred and the profane in the S. João d'Arga's festivities: A digital art installation. International Journal of Creative Interfaces and Computer Graphics (IJCICG), 5(1), 1–20. 
17.   Feist, G. J., Gorman, M. E. (1998). The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline. Review of General Psychology, 2(1), 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.1.3
18.   Forgas, J. P. (1999). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge University Press.
19.   Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 177–189. 
20.   Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Shapira, O. (2009). Preparing for novel versus familiar events: Shifts in global and local processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015748
21.   Franken, I. H. A., & Muris, P. (2005). Individual differences in decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 991–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.004
22.   Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613–617. 
23.   Ganiev, A. G., & Abdunazarova, Z. S. (2021). Biophysics of brain activity: Brain activity in the development of "creative thinking" and "mind map". Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(4), 1–6.
24.   Goldstein, A., Revivo, K., Kreitler, M., & Metuki, N. (2010). Unilateral muscle contractions enhance creative thinking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 895–899. 
25.   Gray, J. A. (2023). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford University Press.
26.   Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14. 
27.    Hardie, S. M., & Wright, L. (2014). Differences between left- and right-handers in approach/avoidance motivation: Influence of consistency of handedness measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00134
28.   Hartikainen, K. M. (2021). Emotion-attention interaction in the right hemisphere. Brain Sciences, 11(8), Article 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11081006
29.    Haynes, B., Haines, A. (1998). Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice. BMJ, 317(7153), 273–276. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7153.273
30.   Hecht, D. (2013). The neural basis of optimism and pessimism. Experimental Neurobiology, 22(3), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.5607/en.2013.22.3.173
31.   Huang, P., Qiu, L., Shen, L., Zhang, Y., Song, Z., Qi, Z., Xie, P. (2013). Evidence for a left-over-right inhibitory mechanism during figural creative thinking in healthy nonartists. Human Brain Mapping, 34(10), 2724–2732. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22093
32.   Karaca, N. H., Aral, N. (2017). The effects of creative relaxation activities on self-concept and motor creativity of kindergarten children]. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 10(1), 134–150.
33.   Kim, B. N., Kwon, S. M. (2017). The link between hypomania risk and creativity: The role of heightened behavioral activation system (BAS) sensitivity. Journal of Affective Disorders, 215, 9–14. 
34.   Lausberg, H., Dvoretska, D., & Ptito, A. (2023). Production of co-speech gestures in the right hemisphere: Evidence from individuals with complete or anterior callosotomy. Neuropsychologia, 180, Article 108484. 
35.   Luft, C. D. B., Zioga, I., Thompson, N. M., Banissy, M. J., & Bhattacharya, J. (2018). Right temporal alpha oscillations as a neural mechanism for inhibiting obvious associations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(52), E12144–E12152. 
36.   Maldonato, M., Dell'Orco, S., & Esposito, A. (2016). The emergence of creativity. World Futures, 72(7–8), 319–326. 
37.   Méndez-Martínez, E., & Fernández-Río, J. (2019). Design and validation of an instrument to assess motor creativity in adolescents. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, 19(75), 451–467. 
38.   Mihov, K. M., Denzler, M., & Förster, J. (2010). Hemispheric specialization and creative thinking: A meta-analytic review of lateralization of creativity. Brain and Cognition, 72(3), 442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.12.007
39.   Motoi, M., Egashira, Y., Nishimura, T., Choi, D., Matsumoto, R., & Watanuki, S. (2014). Time window for cognitive activity involved in emotional processing. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 33(1), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-6805-33-21
40.   Newman, J. P., MacCoon, D. G., Vaughn, L. J., & Sadeh, N. (2005). Validating a distinction between primary and secondary psychopathy with measures of Gray's BIS and BAS constructs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(3), 319–323. 
41.   Pamuk, Ö., Karaca, N. H., & Arabaci, M. (2022). The motor creativity skills of children in preschool: A study on the effect of sports. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 13(5), 2217–2227.
42.   Putri, V., Kawulur, E. I. J. J., Dwiranti, F., Sinuraya, S., & Ratnawati, S. (2022). Hand preference and creativity of Papua University student. Bali Medical Journal, 11(1), 474–477. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v11i1.3306
43.   Shortland, N., & Garry, M. P. (2023). Anxious activism: The role of behavioral inhibition system in the radicalization process. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, Article 107550. 
44.   Springer, S. P., & Deutsch, G. (1998). Left brain, right brain: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (5th ed.). W.H. Freeman.
45.   Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. Simon & Schuster.
46.   Sturza Milić, N. (2014). The influence of motor experience on motor creativity (fluency) of preschool children. Kinesiology, 46(Suppl. 1), S82–S87.
47.   Van Kleeck, M. H. (1989). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia, 27(9), 1165–1178. 
48.   Walia, C. (2019). A dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 237–247. 
49.   Weber, E. (1996). Creative communities in high school: An interactive learning and teaching approach. NASSP Bulletin, 80(583), 76–86. 
50.   Weber, E. (1999). Scientific revolutions, rationality and creativity. Philosophica, 64(2), 93–110.
51.   Wu, G. R., Baeken, C. (2022). Individual interregional perfusion between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation targets and the subgenual anterior cortex predicts response and remission to aiTBS treatment in medication-resistant depression: The influence of behavioral inhibition. Brain Stimulation, 15(1), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.12.003  
دوره 14، شماره 53
پاییز 1404
صفحه 166-185

  • تاریخ دریافت 29 مرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 29 فروردین 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 09 خرداد 1403