تأثیر مکانیسم‌های بی‌قیدی اخلاقی بر گرایش به دوپینگ در ورزشکاران حرفه‌ای با نقش میانجی مطلوبیت اجتماعی

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه جهرم، جهرم، ایران

2 علوم ورزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه جهرم، جهرم، ایران

3 گروه علوم ورزشی دانشگاه جهرم

چکیده

اهداف: هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی تاثیر مکانیسم های بی قیدی اخلاقی بر گرایش به دوپینگ در ورزشکاران حرفه ای با نقش میانجی مطلوبیت اجتماعی بود.
مواد و روش ها: روش تحقیق حاضر توصیفی- همبستگی و از لحاظ هدف کاربردی بود که اطلاعات به صورت میدانی جمع آوری شد. جامعه آماری تحقیق، شامل تمامی ورزشکاران حرفه ای شهر شیراز بود که با توجه به حجم بالای جامعه آماری، تعداد 384 نفر از ورزشکاران حرفه ای رشته های مختلف ورزشی به عنوان نمونه در نظر گرفته شد و از روش نمونه گیری در دسترس استفاده گردید. اطلاعات برای تحقیق حاضر از طریق سه پرسشنامه مکانیسم های بی قیدی اخلاقی (رینگ و همکاران، 2018)، مطلوبیت اجتماعی (استوبر، 2001) و گرایش به دوپینگ (پتروزی، 2007) با آلفای کرونباخ 89/0 می باشد. برای تجزیه‌ وتحلیل داده‌ها از الگوهای معادلات ساختاری، در قالب نرم افزار PLS3 استفاده شد.
یافته ها: نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که مکانیزم های بی‌قیدی اخلاقی بر دو متغیر مطلوبیت اجتماعی و گرایش به دوپینگ اثر معنی داری دارد. همچنین این مکانیزم ها بصورت غیر مستقیم و به واسطه مطلوبیت اجتماعی می تواند بر گرایش به دوپینگ در ورزشکاران حرفه ای اثرگذار باشد.
نتیجه گیری: بنابراین هرچه بی قیدی اخلاقی در ورزشکاران با روش هایی مانند عدم مسئولیت پذیری، توجیه کردن و اعتقاد به کسب ارزشهای بیرونی نظیر جام و مدال، به جای ارتقا و رشد شخصی در ورزش، رواج پیدا کند می تواند به افزایش مطلوبیت اجتماعی در بین ورزشکاران شود در نتیجه احتمال گرایش به دوپینگ را بیشتر می کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Moral Disengagement Mechanisms on the Tendency to Doping with the mediating role of Social Desirability

نویسندگان [English]

  • Kobra Ranjbaran 1
  • hamidreza safari jafarloo 2
  • Mohammad sadegh Afroozeh 3
1 Department of Sport Science, Jahrom University, Jahrom, Iran
2 Jahrom University
3 Jahrom university
چکیده [English]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the Moral Disengagement Mechanisms on tendency to doping with the mediating role of Social Desirability in professional athletes.
Methods & Materials: The present study was descriptive-correlational and applied in terms of purpose that information was collected in the field. The statistical population of the study included all professional athletes in Shiraz city. Due to the high volume of the statistical population and Morgan table, 384 professional athletes in various sports were considered and the Convenience Sampling method was used. Data for the present study were collected through three questionnaires including Moral Disengagement Mechanisms questionnaire by Ring et al (2018) with Cronbach's alpha of 0.98, questionnaire of Social Desirability by Stober (2001) with Cronbach's alpha of 0.97, and questionnaire of Tendency to Doping by Petrozi (2007) with Cronbach's alpha of 0.89. Structural equation models in PLS3 software were used to analyze the data.
Results: The results showed that the moral disengagement mechanisms have a direct and significant effect on the two variables of social desirability and tendency to doping. Also, these mechanisms can indirectly affect the tendency to doping in professional athletes mediating by social desirability.
Conclusion: Therefore, whatever moral disengagement prevails in athletes; with manners such as irresponsibility, justifying and believing in the acquisition of external values (such as cups and medals, instead of promotion and personal growth in sports); social desirability among athletes would be increased which in turn increases tendency to doping.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Moral Disengagement
  • Social Desirability
  • Doping
  • Athletes

مراجع

  1. Bahadorikhosroshahi, J., Barghi, I. (2019). The Role of Social Utility and Acceptance in Predicting Academic Self-Efficacy of High School Students. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 8(1), 133-144. doi: 10.30473/ee.2019.6330 (Persian)
  2. Barkoukis, V., Brooke, L., Ntoumanis, N., Smith, B., & Gucciardi, D. F. (2019). The role of the athletes’ entourage on attitudes to doping. Journal of sports sciences, 37(21), 2483-2491.
  3. Barkoukis, V., Lazuras, L., Tsorbatzoudis, H., & Rodafinos, A. (2011). Motivational and sportspersonship profiles of elite athletes in relation to doping behavior. Psychology of sport and exercise, 12(3), 205-212.
  4. Biranvand, M., Rajabi Noush Abadi, H., Sadjadi, S., Hamidi, M. (2021). A Study on Causes of Elite Athletes' Tendency to Doping. Strategic Studies on Youth ans Sports, 19(50), 83-94(Persian) 
  5. Chan, D. K. C., Tang, T. C., Gucciardi, D. F., Ntoumanis, N., Dimmock, J. A., Donovan, R. J., ... & Hagger, M. S. (2020). Psychological and behavioural factors of unintentional doping: A preliminary systematic review. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(3), 273-295.
  6. Diokan, Behzad. (2016). Doping prevention management (role of educational, sports and religious factors on doping susceptibility of elite athletes), the first national conference on sports science developments in the field of health, prevention and championship, Qazvin, https://civilica.com / doc / 556531(Persian)
  7. Gross, M. B., Wolanin, A. T., Pess, R. A., & Hong, E. S. (2017). Socially desirable responding by student-athletes in the context of depressive symptom evaluation. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 11(2), 148–157.
  8. Gucciardi, D. F., Jalleh, G., & Donovan, R. J. (2010). Does social desirability influence the relationship between doping attitudes and doping susceptibility in athletes?. Psychology of sport and exercise, 11(6), 479-486.
  9. Safari Jafarloo, H. R., Afroozeh, M. S., Mohamadi Turkmani, E., & Behmard, N. (2021). The relationship between coaching behavior style, exercise pleasure and athletes' moral health. Sport Sciences and Health Research, 13(1), 53-60
  10. hadipourfard, M., Afroozeh, M., safari jafarloo, H. (2021). The Relationship between Disappointment and Self-Handicapping with Doping Tendency in Athletes. Sport Psychology Studies (ie, mutaleat ravanshenasi varzeshi), 9(34), 259-282. doi: 10.22089/spsyj.2020.9315.2015 (Persian)
  11. Hurst, P., Ring, C., & Kavussanu, M. (2020). An evaluation of UK athletics’ clean sport programme in preventing doping in junior elite athletes. Performance Enhancement & Health, 7(3-4), 100-155.
  12. Kavussanu, M., & Ring, C. (2017). Moral identity predicts doping likelihood via moral disengagement and anticipated guilt. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 39(4), 293-301.
  13. Kavussanu, M., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Elbe, A. M., & Ring, C. (2016). The moral disengagement in doping scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 24, 188-198.
  14. Khajenoori, B., Sedaghat, H. (2018). The study of relationship between social capital and tendency to consumption of enhancing drugs among athletes in shiraz city. Social Science Quarterly, 12(40), 143-168. (Persian)
  15. Larson, K. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2017). Cultural competence and social desirability among practitioners: A systematic review of the literature. Children and Youth Services Review, 76, 100-111.
  16. Larson, R. B. (2019). Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research, 61(5), 534-547.
  17. Latkin, C. A., Edwards, C., Davey-Rothwell, M. A., & Tobin, K. E. (2017). The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addictive behaviors, 73, 133-136.
  18. Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Social desirability. Encyclopedia of survey research methods, 2, 825-6.
  19. Lippi, G., & Schena, F. (2017). Run for Science (R4S): the history of a successful project of precision and laboratory medicine in sport and exercise. J Lab Precis Med, 2, 11.
  20. Mudrak, J., Slepicka, P., & Slepickova, I. (2018). Sport motivation and doping in adolescent athletes. PLoS one, 13(10), e0205222. 20.
  21. Overbye, M. (2017). Deterrence by risk of detection? An inquiry into how elite athletes perceive the deterrent effect of the doping testing regime in their sport. Drugs: education, prevention and policy, 24(2), 206-219.
  22. Petróczi, A. (2007). Attitudes and doping: a structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes' attitudes, sport orientation and doping behaviour. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2(1), 1-15.
  23. Piffaretti, M. (2011). Psychological determinants of doping behaviour through the testimony of sanctioned athletes. World Anti-doping Agency, Play true.
  24. Sharepour, M., Kabiri, S., Rahmati, M., Riahi, M. (2018). The Social Learning Process of Illegal Performance-Enhancing Drugs (Doping) UseAmongProfessional Athletes. Journal of Social Problems of Iran, 9(2), 117-138. doi: 10.22059/ijsp.2018.68622(Persian)
  25. Stanger, N., & Backhouse, S. H. (2020). A multistudy cross-sectional and experimental examination into the interactive effects of moral identity and moral disengagement on doping. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 42(3), 185-200.
  26. TaheriChadorneshin, H., Esmaeili, M. R., Farahi, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2019). Prevalence, Attitude and Tendency Toward Use of Performance-enhancing Supplements in Athletes in North Khorasan Province. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology, 15(3), 289-299. (Persian)
  27. Tourangeau, R. & Yan. T. (2007). Sensitive Questiors in Surveys. Psychological Bulletin.133(5), 859-883
  28. Zahedi, M., Dadgar, A., Zamani, S. G., & Shahbazi, A. (2018). Doping and investigating CAS arbitration against doping. Medical Law Journal, 12(45), 171-190. (Persian)

 

مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی
دوره 13، شماره 47
فروردین 1403
صفحه 143-154

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 05 تیر 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 12 دی 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 30 بهمن 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار