مقایسه هوش هیجانی، خودکارآمدی و ابعاد چشم‌اندازهای زمانی در ورزشکاران کشتی‌گیر نخبه و غیرنخبه

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 پژوهشگر پسادکتری، پژوهشگاه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی و گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران

2 گروه رفتار حرکتی و روانشناسی ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

چکیده

هدف: با اینکه ورزشکاران از نظر سطح مهارت و آمادگی جسمانی به یکدیگر خیلی نزدیک شده‌اند، اما همچنان در متغیرهای روان‌شناختی با یکدیگر متفاوتند. از این رو، هدف پژوهش حاضر مقایسه هوش هیجانی، خودکارآمدی و ابعاد چشم‌اندازهای زمانی در بین ورزشکاران کشتی‌گیر نخبه و غیرنخبه بود.
مواد و روش‌ها: راهبرد این پژوهش توصیفی و پس‌رویدادی است. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه ورزشکاران مرد نخبه و غیرنخبه ایرانی در رشته ورزشی کشتی بود که در نهایت 22 ورزشکار نخبه و 36 ورزشکار غیرنخبه به شیوه نمونه‌گیری هدفمند به‌عنوان نمونه پژوهش انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها شامل پرسش‌نامه هوش هیجانی برادبری (2005)، پرسش‌نامه خودکارآمدی عمومی شرر (1982) و پرسش‌نامه چشم‌اندازهای زمانی زیمباردو (1999)، بود. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از آزمون تحلیل واریانس چند متغیره و با بکارگیری نرم افزار SPSS نسخه 23، در سطح معنی‌داری 05/0p<، انجام شد.
 یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داده که بین کشتی‌گیران نخبه و غیرنخبه در متغیرهای هوش‌ هیجانی، خودکارآمدی و ابعاد چشم­اندازه‌های زمانی تفاوت معنی‌داری وجود دارد. کشتی‌گیران نخبه از سطح هوش هیجانی و خودکارآمدی بالاتری نسبت به کشتی‌گیران غیرنخبه برخودار بودند. همچنین، به جز مؤلفه گذشته منفی که نمره کشتی‌گیران نخبه پایین‌تر از کشتی‌گیران غیرنخبه بود؛ در سایر مؤلفه‌ها (حال تقدیرگرا، حال لذت‌گرا، گذشته مثبت، آینده و آینده متعالی)، نمره کشتی‌گیران نخبه بیشتر از کشتی‌گیران غیرنخبه بود.
نتیجه‌گیری: باتوجه به نتایج پژوهش حاضر، می‌توان گفت متغیرهای هوش هیجانی، خودکارآمدی و چشم‌اندازهای زمانی و اثرات آن بر عملکرد نخبگی ورزشکاران بایستی بیش از پیش مورد توجه کلیه ورزشکاران، والدین، مربیان و متخصصین ورزشی قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Comparison of Emotional Intelligence, Self-Efficacy, and Time Perspective Dimensions Between Elite and Non-Elite Wrestlers

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shahram Nazarpouri 1
  • Mohammadtaghi Aghdasi 2
1 Postdoctoral Researcher, Sport Sciences Research Institute (SSRI), and Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
2 Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Background and Purpose
Success in professional sports is influenced by a variety of factors, which arise from both individual and environmental influences (Žvan & Čoh, 2018). According to dynamic systems theory, an individual's development and success in a particular sport is the result of an almost limitless combination of interactions between individual, environmental, and task-related factors. In this regard, psychological variables such as self-efficacy, emotional intelligence and time perspectives can be considered as individual factors that interact in complex ways with environmental factors and task demands, ultimately shaping the development and sports success of gifted athletes (Adams & Nettle, 2009). So far, limited researches has examined and compared psychological variables such as emotional intelligence and self-efficacy among elite and non-elite athletes in our country. Furthermore, time perspective
 
variables have not yet been explored in studies related to the field of sports in our country.
Therefore, the current research was conducted with the aim of identifying important and influential variables in the recognition of sports talent by comparing emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and the different dimensions of time perspective between elite and non-elite wrestlers.
 
Materials & Methods
The design of the current research is descriptive and post-event, with a practical purpose. The statistical population included all Iranian elite and non-elite male wrestlers from across the country. The sample was selected through purposive sampling and consisted of 22 elite wrestlers and 36 non-elite wrestlers, with an average age of 27 years. The data collection tools in this research were: 1) Questionnaire developed by the researcher to gather personal information about the athletes. This questionnaire included questions regarding the athletes' sports activity history, membership history in the national team, and any history of medical conditions. At the end of this questionnaire, the consent form for participation in the research was provided.  2) emotional intelligence questionnaire by Bradbury et al. (2005): this questionnaire, which was used to assess the emotional intelligence of the participants, consists of two parts. 3) Scherer's General Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (1982): This scale measures three dimensions of human behavior: the willingness to initiate behavior, the persistence in continuing efforts to complete behavior, and the ability to overcome obstacles.4) Zimbardo and Boyd Time Perspective Questionnaire (1999): This questionnaire evaluates time perspectives through six components:, including negative past, positive past, hedonistic present, deterministic present, future, and sublime future, using a five-point Likert scale. In this research, the implementation steps and especially the data collection were carried out in accordance with the limitations imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic and the challenges it presented. To summarize and categorize the data, descriptive statistics were initially used, including the calculation of central tendency and dispersion indices (mean and standard deviation).Subsequently, after verifying the compliance with the statistical assumptions for the multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), including the normality of the data (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), homogeneity of variances (Levene's test), and the assumption of homogeneity of the variance-covariance matrix (M-box test), the MANOVA test was used to compare emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and the different dimensions of time perspective between elite and non-elite wrestlers. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 23 software, with a significance level set at p<0.05.
 
Findings
The results of the Wilkes Lambda test indicated a significant difference between the elite and non-elite wrestler groups in at least one of the variables—emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, or the different dimensions of time perspective (P< 0.000, η² = 0.906, F = 51.178). Based on this, a significant difference was observed between the two groups of elite and non-elite wrestlers in the variables of emotional intelligence (P< 0.000, η² = 0.462) and self-efficacy (P= 0.002, η² = 0.164).  Additionally, significant differences were observed between elite and non-elite wrestlers in the dimensions of time perspective, including critical present (P< 0.000, η² = 0.492), hedonic present (P< 0.044, η² = 0.072, F = 4.247), positive past (P < 0.000, η² = 0.652, F = 104.716), negative past (P< 0.000, η² = 0.615, F = 86.070), future (P< 0.000, η² = 0.754, F = 171.718), and transcendental future (P< 0.000, η² = 0.472, F = 50.126). In this way, except for the component of negative past perspective, the score of elite athletes was lower than non-elite athletes. In all other components, the scores of elite athletes were higher than those of non-elite wrestlers.
Conclusion
According to the results of this research, it can be concluded that the variables of emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and time perspective, along with their impact on elite athletic performance, should receive greater attention from athletes, parents, coaches, and sports experts. The current research was limited to the investigation of elite and non-elite male athletes in the field of wrestling and at adult age levels. In this regard, conducting similar research among elite and non-elite male and female athletes across other individual and team sports, and at various age levels (adolescence, youth, and adulthood), could provide more comprehensive and complete insights for researchers in the field of sports psychology.
 FundingThe present study received no financial support from any institution or organization.
Authors’ Contributions
First author: Data collection, data analysis and authorship of the introduction; Second author: conceptualization and presentation of the idea, and methodology. All authors contributed equally to the writing and revision of the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: elite wrestlers
  • emotional intelligence
  • self-efficacy
  • time perspectives

مراجع

  1. Astrom, E., Wiberg, B., Sircova, A., Wiberg, M., & Carelli, M. G. (2014). Insights into features of anxiety through multiple aspects of psychological time. Journal of Integrative Psychology and Therapeutics, 2(3), 1–7.
  2. Adams, J., and Nettle, D. (2009). Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity: an empirical study. Br. J. Health Psychol. 14, 83–105. Doi: 10.1348/135910708X2 99664.
  3. Arribas-Galarraga, S., Cecchini, J. A., Luis-De-Cos, I., Saies, E., & Cos, L. D. (2019). Influence of emotional intelligence on sport performance in elite canoeist.
  4. Bastian, V. A., Burns, N. R., & Nettelbeck, T. (2005). Emotional intelligence predicts life skills, but not as well as personality and cognitive abilities. Personality and individual differences, 39(6), 1135-1145.
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 4(3), 359.
  6. Boniwell, I., Osin, E., and Sircova, A. (2014). Introducing time perspective coaching: a new approach to improve time management and enhance wellbeing. Int. J. Evid. Based Coach. Mentor. 12, 24–40.
  7. Boyd, J. N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1997). Constructing time after death: The transcendental-future time perspective. Time & Society, 6(1), 35-54.

 

  1. Crombie, D., Lombard, C., & Noakes, T. (2009). Emotional intelligence scores predict team sports performance in a national cricket competition. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4(2), 209-224.
  2. Cairney, J., Hay, J. A., Faught, B. E., Leger, L. U. C., & Mathers, B. (2008). Generalized self‐efficacy and performance on the 20‐metre shuttle run in children. American Journal of Human Biology, 20(2), 132-138.
  3. Campo, M., Laborde, S., & Mosley, E. (2016). Emotional intelligence training in team sports: The influence of a season long intervention program on trait emotional intelligence. Journal of Individual Differences, 37(3), 152.
  4. Feltz, D. L., & Lirgg, C. D. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs of athletes, teams, and coaches. Handbook of sport psychology, 2(2001), 340-61.
  5. Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Human Kinetics.
  6. García, J. A., and Ruiz, B. (2015). Exploring the role of time perspective in leisure choices: What about the balanced time perspective? J. Leis. Res. 47, 515–537. Doi: 10.18666/jlr-2015-v47-i5-5876.
  7. Guthrie, L. C., Lessl, K., Ochi, O., and Ward, M. M. (2013). Time perspective and smoking, obesity, and exercise in a community sample. Am. J. Health Behav. 37, 171–180. Doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.2.4.
  8. Golestane, Seyed Musa; Afshin, Seyed Ali and Dehghani, Ali (2015). The relationship between time perspective and goal orientation, academic procrastination and academic achievement. Students of different faculties of the Persian Gulf University. Two quarterly scientific-research journal of social cognition, 52-71, (2). (Persian).
  9. Guillén, F., and Martínez-Alvarado, J. R. (2014). The sport engagement scale: an adaptation of the utrecht work engagement scale (UWES) for the Sports Environment. Univ. Psychol. 13, 975–984.
  10. Henson, J. M., Carey, M. P., Carey, K. B., and Maisto, S. A. (2006). Associations among health behaviors and time perspective in young adults: model testing with boot-strapping replication. J. Behav. Med. 29, 127–137. Doi: 10.1007/ s10865-005-9027-2.
  11. Harber, K. D., Zimbardo, P. G., and Boyd, J. N. (2003). Participant self-selection biases as a function of individual differences in time perspective. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 25, 255–264. Doi: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_08.
  12. Joseph, D. L., Jin, J., Newman, D. A., & O'Boyle, E. H. (2015). Why does self-reported emotional intelligence predict job performance? A meta-analytic investigation of mixed EI. Journal of applied psychology, 100(2), 298.
  13. Kuczka, K. K., & Treasure, D. C. (2005). Self-handicapping in competitive sport: Influence of the motivational climate, self-efficacy, and perceived importance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6(5), 539-550.
  14. Laborde, Sylvain, Fabrice Dosseville, Félix Guillén, and Enrique Chávez. "Validity of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire in sports and its links with performance satisfaction." Psychology of Sport and Exercise15, no. 5 (2014): 481-490.
  15. Laborde, S., Guillén, F., & Watson, M. (2017). Trait emotional intelligence questionnaire full-form and short-form versions: Links with sport participation frequency and duration and type of sport practiced. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 5-9.
  16. Leung, D., & Esplen, M. J. (2010). Alleviating existential distress of cancer patients: can relational ethics guide clinicians? European Journal of Cancer Care, 19(1), 30–38.
  17. Laborde, S., Guillén, F., & Watson, M. (2017). Trait emotional intelligence questionnaire full-form and short-form versions: Links with sport participation frequency and duration and type of sport practiced. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 5-9.
  18. Lane, A. M., & Wilson, M. (2011). Emotions and trait emotional intelligence among ultra-endurance runners. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14(4), 358-362.
  19. MacNamara, Á. Button, A., and Collins, D. (2010). The role of psychological characteristics in facilitating the pathway to elite performance part1: identifying mental skills and behaviors. Sport. Psychol. 24, 52–73. Doi: 10.1123/tsp.24.1.52.
  20. Mitić P, Nedeljković J, Bojanić Ž, Franceško M, Milovanović I, Bianco A, Drid P. Differences in the Psychological Profiles of Elite and Non-elite Athletes. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021 Mar 18; 12:769.
  21. Makari Sai, Sima, Hosseini, Fatemeh Sadat, & Ahmadi, Malik. (2022). The role of general self-efficacy and psychological resistance on psychological management in premier league basketball players. Sports psychology studies, doi: 10.22089/spsyj.2020.9224.2003. (In Persian).
  22. Malik Mohammadi Mohsen, Nouri Hasan Ali and Ibn al-Shariah Milad (2015). Emotional intelligence, its dimensions, characteristics and models. The second international conference on modern researches in management, Tehran. (In Persian).
  23. Moritz, S. E., Feltz, D. L., Fahrbach, K. R., & Mack, D. E. (2000). The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 71(3), 280-294.
  24. Nazarpuri, Khalji, & Mardane (2013). the relationship between IQ, emotional intelligence and movement readiness with learning claw skills and volleyball serve. Motor behavior, 12, 141-161. (In Persian).
  25. Oyanadel, C., Buela-Casal, G., Araya, T., Olivares, C., and Vega, H. (2014). Percepción del tiempo: resultados de una intervención grupal breve para el cambio del perfil temporal [Time perception: results of a brief group intervention to change time perspective profiles]. Suma Psicol. 21, 1–7. Doi: 10.1016/S0121-4381(14)70001-3.
  26. Pelletier, L. G., Rocchi, M. A., Vallerand, R. J., Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (2013). Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II). Psychol. Sport Exerc. 14, 329–341. Doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.12.002.
  27. Perlini, A. H., & Halverson, T. R. (2006). Emotional intelligence in the national hockey league. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 38(2), 109.
  28. Pina, J. A., Passos, A. M., Maynard, M. T., & Sinval, J. (2021). Self-efficacy, mental models and team adaptation: A first approach on football and futsal refereeing. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 52, 101787.
  29. Raedeke, T. D., and Smith, A. L. (2001). Development and preliminary validation of an athlete burnout measure. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 23, 281–306. Doi: 10.1123/ jsep.23.4.281.
  30. Stolarski, M., Fieulaine, N., & Van Beek, W. (Eds.). (2015). Time perspective theory: Review, research & application. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  31. Shojaei, Vahid, & Ghorbani, Saeed. (2022). The relationship between perseverance and mental strength and emotional intelligence of elite athletes. Sports psychology studies, doi: 10.22089/spsyj.2019.6484.1686. (In Persian)
  32. Stephen, S. A., Habeeb, C. M., & Arthur, C. A. (2022). Congruence of efficacy beliefs on the coach-athlete relationship and athlete anxiety: Athlete self-efficacy and coach estimation of athlete self-efficacy. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 58, 102062.
  33. Stolarski, M., Fieulaine, N., and Zimbardo, P. G. (2018). “Putting time in a wider perspective: The past, the present, and the future of time perspective theory,” in The SAGE Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences, Eds V. Zeigler-Hill and T. K. Shackelford (Thousand Oakes, CA: SAGE Publishing).
  34. Stolarski, M., Waleriańczyk, W., & Pruszczak, D. (2019). Introducing temporal theory to the field of sport psychology: Toward a conceptual model of time, perspectives in athletes’ functioning. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2772.
  35. Soylu, Y. (2021). Comparison of emotional intelligence levels of soccer players according to age and playing position. Acta Gymnica, 51(1), 1-5.
  36. Shores, K., and Scott, D. (2007). The relationship of individual time perspective and recreation experience preferences. J. Leis. Res. 39, 28–59. Doi: 10.1080/00222216. 2007.11950097.
  37. Suddendorf, T., and Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behav. Brain Sci. 30, 299–313. Doi: 10.1017/S0140525X07001975.
  38. Taj, Mahshid; Makri, Azarakhsh & Fatuhi, Akbar (2005). Depreciation of delayed value and its correlation with time perspective in medical interns. Journal 327-334, (3) Iranian psychiatry and clinical psychology (thought and behavior), 11. (Persian).
  39. Winsley, R., and Matos, N. (2011). Overtraining and elite young athletes. Med. Sport Sci. 56, 97–105. Doi: 10.1159/000320636.
  40. Wittig, A. F., Duncan, S. L., & Schurr, K. T. (1987). The relationship of gender, gender-role endorsement and perceived physical self-efficacy to sport competition anxiety. Journal of sport behavior, 10(4), 192.
  41. Vealey, R. S. (1986). Conceptualization of sport-confidence and competitive orientation: Preliminary investigation & instrument development. J. Sport Psychol. 8, 221–246. Doi: 10.1123/jsp.8.3.221.
  42. Van Yperen, N. W. (2009). Why some make it and others do not: identifying psychological factors that predict career success in professional adult soccer. Sport. Psychol. 23, 317–329. Doi: 10.1123/tsp.23.3.317.
  43. Žvan, M., & Čoh, M. (2018). Identification of young talents in sport. Glasnik Antropološkog društva Srbije, 53(1-2).
  44. Zimbardo, P. G., and Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77, 1271–1288.Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271.
  45. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox: the new psychology of time that will change your life. New York: Free Press.

 

  1. Zentsova, N. I., and Leonov, S. V. (2013). Comparative characteristics of time perspective of professional athletes and drug addicted people. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 78, 340–344.Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.307.
  2. Zagórska, A., & Guszkowska, M. (2014). A program to support self‐efficacy among athletes. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 24(3), e121-e128.

 

مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی
دوره 13، شماره 48
تیر 1403
صفحه 55-74

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 29 دی 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 13 دی 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 30 بهمن 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار