مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی

مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی

مدلسازی ارتباط سبک‌های رهبری با عملکرد تیمی دانش‌آموزان ورزشکار: بررسی نقش واسطه‌ای جو روانی و انسجام تیمی

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
عبدالله حمایت طلب 1
اعظم حیدرزاده 2
ناهیده پورجمال 3
مهدی حیدری 4
1 گروه تربیت بدنی واحد مرند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرند، ایران.
2 گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد ماکو، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ماکو، ایران.
3 گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد ارومیه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارومیه، ایران
4 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، واحد اصفهان(خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران.
10.22089/spsyj.2026.18831.2634
چکیده
چکیده
هدف: هدف از این مطالعه بررسی نقش میانجی جوّ روانی و انسجام تیمی در رابطه بین سبک‌های رهبری و عملکرد تیمی در دانش­آموزان ورزشکار بود.
مواد و روش ها: طرح مطالعه حاضر همبستگی از نوع معادلات ساختاری بود. نمونه آماری شامل ۳۰۰ ورزشکار از رشته‌های ورزشی مختلف بود که به صورت نمونه گیری دردسترس انتخاب شده و پرسشنامه‌های استانداردی را برای سنجش سبک‌های رهبری، جوّ روانی، انسجام تیمی و عملکرد تیمی تکمیل کردند. از نرم افزار ماکرو پروسس نسخه 4 برای تحلیل آماری استفاده شد.
یافته ها: نتایج نشان داد که روابط مثبت و معنی داری بین سبک رهبری با جوّ روانی (46/0 =r، 001/0>P)، انسجام تیمی (39/0= r، 001/0>P) و عملکرد تیمی (34/0 = r، 001/0>P) وجود داشت. همچنین، جوّ روانی به طور مثبت و معنی­داری با انسجام تیمی (48/0 = r، 001/0 >P) و عملکرد تیمی (41/0 = r، 001/0 >P) ارتباط داشت. نتایج تحلیل میانجی نشان داد که جوّ روانی و انسجام تیمی به طور کامل به عنوان میانجی در رابطه بین سبک رهبری و عملکرد تیمی عمل می کنند، با اثر غیرمستقیم قابل توجه 26/0 ([34/0، 18/0] CI 95%). با در نظر گرفتن این واسطه‌ها، تأثیر مستقیم رهبری بر عملکرد معنی‌دار نبود (08/0 = β، 12/0 = p).
نتیجه گیری: این یافته‌ها بر اهمیت رهبری مؤثر در ایجاد یک فضای روانی مثبت تأکید می‌کنند که به نوبه خود انسجام و عملکرد تیمی را افزایش می‌دهد. پیامدهای این یافته­ها برای مربیان، مدیران ورزشی و روانشناسان ورزشی قابل توجه است و نشان دهنده نیاز به استراتژی‌ها و مداخلاتی است که محیط‌های حمایتی و پویایی تیمی منسجم را ارتقا می‌دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سبک‌های رهبری
جو روانی
انسجام تیمی
عملکرد تیمی
دانش‌آموزان ورزشکار
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Modeling the Relationship between Leadership Styles and Team Performance among Student-Athletes: Examining the Mediating Role of Psychological Climate and Team Cohesion

نویسندگان English

Abdollah Hemayattalab 1
Azam Heidarzadeh 2
Nahideh Pourjamal 3
Mahdi Heydari 4
1 Department of Physical Education, Mara. C., Islamic Azad University, Marand, Iran.
2 Department of Physical Education, Mak. C., Islamic Azad University, Maku, Iran
3 M.A. in Corrective exercises, Ur. C., Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran
4 Phd Student in Sport Management, Sport Science Faculty, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده English

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the mediating role of psychological climate and team cohesion in the relationship between leadership styles and team performance among student-athletes.
Methods: The present study employed a correlational design using structural equation modeling. The sample consisted of 300 athletes from various sports disciplines who were selected through convenience sampling and completed standard questionnaires to measure leadership styles, psychological climate, team cohesion, and team performance. The PROCESS macro version 4 was used for statistical analysis.
Findings: The results showed positive and significant relationships between leadership style and psychological climate (r = 0.46, P < 0.001), team cohesion (r = 0.39, P < 0.001), and team performance (r = 0.34, P < 0.001). Additionally, psychological climate was positively and significantly related to team cohesion (r = 0.48, P < 0.001) and team performance (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). The mediation analysis results indicated that psychological climate and team cohesion fully mediated the relationship between leadership style and team performance, with a significant indirect effect of 0.26 (95% CI [0.18, 0.34]). When these mediators were included, the direct effect of leadership on performance was not significant (β = 0.08, p = 0.12).
Conclusion: These findings emphasize the importance of effective leadership in creating a positive psychological climate, which in turn enhances team cohesion and performance. The implications of these findings are significant for coaches, sports managers, and sports psychologists, indicating the need for strategies and interventions that promote supportive environments and cohesive team dynamics.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Leadership Styles
Psychological Climate
Team Cohesion
Team Performance
Student-Athletes
References
1.                  Bagheri, R., Sohrabi, Z., & Moradi, E. (2015). Psychometric properties of Persian version of the multifactor leadership questionnaire (MLQ). Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 29, 256.
2.                   Bai, N., & Dana, A. (2013). The relationship between coaching behaviors and athletes’ burnout in Golestan province futsal super league players. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 3(6), 111-114.
3.                   Bajcar, B., & Babiak, J. (2022). Transformational and Transactional Leadership in the Polish Organizational Context: Validation of the Full and Short Forms of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 908594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908594
4.                   Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.358
5.                   Carron, A. V., Colman, M., Wheeler, J., & Stevens, D. E. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.24.2.168
6.                   Castro-Sánchez, M., Zurita-Ortega, F., García-Marmol, E., & Chacón-Cuberos, R. (2019). Motivational Climate in Sport Is Associated with Life Stress Levels, Academic Performance and Physical Activity Engagement of Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 16(7), 1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071198
7.                   Dana, A., Shahir, V. A., & Ghorbani, S. (2022). The impact of mindfulness and mental skills protocols on athletes’ competitive anxiety. Biomedical Human Kinetics, 14(1), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2022-0017
8.                   Dana, A., Shojaei, V., & Ghorbani, S. (2023). The Relationship of Grit with Mental Toughness and Emotional Intelligence (EQ) of Elite Athletes. Sport Psychology Studies, 12(44), 1-22. In Persian
https://doi.org/10.22089/spsyj.2019.6484.1686
9.                   Dare, P. S., & Saleem, A. (2022). Toward Success While Tackling the Change in A Pandemic Age: Path-Goal Theory Leadership as a Win-Win Gadget. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 944145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944145
10.                Eshghi, M. A., Kordi, R., Memari, A. H., Ghaziasgar, A., Mansournia, M. A., & Zamani Sani, S. H. (2015). Validity and Reliability of Farsi Version of Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sports Medicine, 2015, 985283. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/985283
11.                García-Álvarez, J. M., García-Sánchez, A., Molina-Rodríguez, A., Suárez-Cortés, M., & Díaz-Agea, J. L. (2025). Validation of the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) in a Simulated Learning Environment. Nursing Reports, 15(5), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050154
12.                Gu, S., & Xue, L. (2022). Relationships among Sports Group Cohesion, Psychological Collectivism, Mental Toughness and Athlete Engagement in Chinese Team Sports Athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 19(9), 4987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19094987
13.                Hosseini, F. B., Charbaghi, Z., Poshtiban, K., Gholidahaneh, M., & Ghorbani, S. (2021). Self-Esteem, Goal Orientation, Physical Self-Efficacy, and Health- Related Physical Fitness among Athletic and Non-Athletic Middle-School Students: a Comparative Study. International Journal of School Health, 8(4), 234-240. https://doi.org/10.30476/intjsh.2021.92872.1179
14.                Ilkim, M. (2024). Associations between Resilience and the Rehabilitation’s Beliefs among Injured Student-Athletes: Mediating Role of Social Support. Physical Activity in Children, 1(2), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.61186/pach.2024.486723.1036
15.                Li, J., & Villanueva, L. E. (2023). Coach leadership behavior and student-athlete performance: Towards a university sports leadership program. Journal of Education & Educational Research, 5(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.54097/vmhed988
16.                Maechel, C., Loughead, T. M., & Beckmann, J. (2020). The Testing of a Four-Dimensional Model of Athlete Leadership and Its Relation to Leadership Effectiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01361
17.                Muñoz, A. R., Vega-Díaz, M., & González-García, H. (2023). Team Cohesion Profiles: Influence on the Development of Mental Skills and Stress Management. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 22(4), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2023.637
18.                Oh, Y., & Yoo, J.-I. (2023). Team cohesion in individual/team sports athletes: transformational leadership and the role of social norms. Healthcare, 11(6), 792. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060792
19.                Sadeghi Pour, N. (2024). Relationships between Mental Toughness with Academic and Sport Performance in Athletic Students: Mediating Role of Mindfulness and Self-efficacy. Physical Activity in Children, 1(2), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.61186/PACH.2024.480579.1027
20.                Sigalet, E., Donnon, T., Cheng, A., Cooke, S., Robinson, T., Bissett, W., & Grant, V. (2013). Development of a team performance scale to assess undergraduate health professionals. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 88(7), 989–996. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294fd45
21.              Smith, S. M. (2025). Temporal associations between psychological climate and coach-rated team performance in sport. Scientific Journal of Sport & Performance, 5(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.55860/OKDG8774
22.              Tahmasebi Boroujeni, S., Shahbazi, M., & Salehi, K. (2003). Study the validity and reliability of the Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire-2 (PMCSQ-2) for Iranian athletes. Journal of Research in Sport Management & Motor Behavior, 6, 29-46.
23.                Wang, L., Xu, J., & Liu, Y. (2024). The impact of team cohesion on athlete engagement in collegiate basketball leagues: The moderating role of paternalistic leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1473506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1473506
24.                Wu, M., Kader Cassim, F. A., Priambodo, A., & Ko, C. (2022). Psychological Capital's impact on the leadership-organizational climate preference relationship in potential leaders ∼ A study comparing teachers and sportsmen∼. Heliyon, 8(5), e09310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09310
25.                Zhu, Y., Wang, M., Cruz, A. B., & Kim, H.-D. (2024). Systematic review and meta-analysis of Chinese coach leadership and athlete satisfaction and cohesion. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1385178.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1385178
مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی
دوره 15، شماره 57
پاییز 1405
صفحه 176-183

  • تاریخ دریافت 26 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 29 فروردین 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 01 اردیبهشت 1405