نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد روان شناسی ورزش دانشگاه تهران

2 دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)

3 دانشیار دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر ارزیابی ویژگی‌های روان­سنجی نسخة فارسی پرسش­نامة تصویرسازی حرکتی-3 بود. در مرحلة اول، پرسش­نامة مورد نظر با رعایت قواعد ساختاری ترجمه به زبان فارسی برگردانده شد. در مرحلة دوم، با استفاده از روش تحلیل عاملی تأییدی عوامل این پرسش­نامه مورد آزمون قرار گرفتند (164 مرد و 155 زن)؛ در همین مرحله روایی همزمان با استفاده از نسخة فارسی پرسش­نامة وضوح تصویرسازی حرکتی-2 به دست آمد (61 مرد و 43 زن). در مرحلة سوم، پایایی پرسش­نامه با استفاده از روش همسانی درونی و ثبات زمانی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت که در آن، 53 مرد و 42 زن با فاصلة زمانی 14 تا 30 روز پرسش­نامه را تکمیل کردند. با توجه به نتایج به­دست­آمده می‌توان گفت که این پرسش­نامه دارای روایی سازه، روایی همزمان و همسانی درونی مناسب در جامعة ایرانی است و می­تواند ابزار مناسبی برای سنجش توانایی تصویرسازی در سه بعد تصویرسازی حرکتی، تصویرسازی دیداری درونی و تصویرسازی دیداری بیرونی باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Hojati 1
  • Mohammad VaezMousavi 2
  • Mohammad Khabiri 3

1

2

3

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3). At the first stage, MIQ-3 was translated into Persian according to the standard method. At the second stage, the factorial structure of the questionnaire was tested, using confirmatory factor analysis. A number of 164 male and 155 female athletes of different competitive levels participated at this stage; also the concurrent validity of MIQ-3 was evaluated, using Persian version of the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire VMIQ-2 (61 males and 43 females). At the third stage, the reliability of MIQ-3 was calculated by two methods, test-retest and internal consistency. In this stage, 53 male and 42 female athletes with a time interval of 14 to 30 day participated. The scale demonstrated good content and good factorial validity as well as good concurrent validity and internal consistency, it can be concluded that the Persian version of MIQ-3 has proper validity and reliability. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mental Imagery
  • Visual Imagery
  • Validity
  • Reliability
  • Concurrent Validity
  • Internal Consistency
  1. Bentler, P. (1988). Comparative fit indexes in structural models (UCLA Statistics Series No. 9). Los Angeles: University of California.
  2. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C.-P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117.

 

 

  1. Caliari, P. (2008). Enhancing forehand acquisition in table tennis: the role of mental practice. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20(1), 88-96.
  2. Cumming, J., & Ramsey, R. (2008). Imagery interventions in sport. Advances in Applied Sport Psychology, 5.
  3. Cumming, J., Williams, S. E., & Murphy, S. (2012). The role of imagery in performance. Handbook of sport and performance psychology, 213-232.
  4. Cumming, J. L., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2001). The cognitive and motivational effects of imagery training: A matter of perspective. The Sport Psychologist, 15, 276-288.
  5. Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 201.
  6. Goss, S., Hall, C., Buckolz, E., & Fishburne, G. (1986). Imagery ability and the acquisition and retention of movements. Memory & cognition, 14(6), 469-477.
  7. Hall, C., Pongrac, J., & Buckholz, E. (1985). The measurement of imagery ability. Human Movement Science, 4(2), 107-118.
  8. Hall, C. R., & Martin, K. A. (1997). Measuring movement imagery abilities: a revision of the movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of mental imagery. 21(1-2): 143-154.
  9. Lorant, J., & Nicolas, A. (2004). Validation de la traduction française du Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised (MIQ-R). Movement & Sport Sciences, 53(3), 57-68.
  10. Roberts, R., Callow, N., Hardy, L., Markland, D., & Bringer, J. (2008). Movement imagery ability: Development and assessment of a revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology(30), 200-221.
  11. Rostami HajiAbadi, M., Rahnama, N., Sohrabi, M., KhayamBashi, Kh., BambaeeChi, E., & Mojtahedi, M. (2011). Validity and reliability of vividness movement imagery questionnaire: the Persian version. Olympic journal. 54: 129-139. In Persian
  12. Sohrabi, M., Farsi, A., and Fooladian, J. (2010). Validity and reliability of revised movement imagery questionnaire: the Persian version. Motor Behavior. In Persian
  13. Vealey, R., & Greenleaf, C. (2001). Seeing is believing: Understanding and using imagery in sport. Applied sport psychology: Personal growth to peak performance, 4, 247-272.
  14. Weinberg, R. (2008). Does imagery work? Effects on performance and mental skills. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 3(1): 1-9.
  15. Weinberg, R. S. & Gould, D. (2011). Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology (5th ed, pp. 294-295), Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.
  16. White, A., & Hardy, L. (1995). Use of different imagery perspectives on the learning and performance of different motor skills. British Journal of Psychology, 86(2), 169-180
  17. Williams, S. E., Cumming, J., Ntoumanis, N., Nordin-Bates, S. M., Ramsey, R., & Hall, C. (2012). Further validation and development of the movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34, 621-646.