مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

در باره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

داوران

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

هزینه های دریافتی نشریه

راهنمای نگارش مقاله

فرم ها

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

مکان اثر انگیختگی و فعال‌سازی در مراحل پردازش اطلاعات

نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه آزاد واحد علوم و تحقیقات

2 استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز (نویسندة مسئول

3 استاد دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، تعیین مکان اثر انگیختگی و فعال‌سازی در مراحل پردازش اطلاعات بود. 30 دانشجوی دختر غیر‌ورزشکار، به‌طور داوطلبانه در این‌‌ پژوهش شرکت‌‌ نمودند. شرکت‌کنندگان تکلیف تحلیل زمان‌‌ واکنش را که توسط دستگاه ثبت عملکرد وینا ارائه می‌شد، اجرا نمودند، و  فعالیت الکتریکی پوست آنها توسط دستگاه بیودرم یو.اف.آ به طور همزمان ثبت می‌شد. با کسر سطح هدایت الکتریکی در حال استراحت از سطح آن در هنگام فعالیت، فعال‌سازی وابسته به تکلیف برای هر شرکت‌کننده محاسبه شد. زمان هر مرحله از مراحل پردازش نیز ثبت شد. تحلیل رگرسیون خطی ساده نشان داد که فعال‌سازی با مدّت مرحلة شناسایی محرک و انتخاب پاسخ همبستگی ندارد؛ اما، با افزایش فعال‌سازی، مدّت مرحلة برنامه‌ریزی پاسخ کاهش یافت. به طور کل نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان‌داد که مکان اثر فعال‌سازی بر مراحل پردازش اطلاعات، مرحلة برنامه‌ریزی پاسخ می‌باشد.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Locus of Arousal and Activation Effects on Information Processing Stages

نویسندگان [English]

  • Samaneh Daman Pak 1
  • pouneh mokhtari 2
  • Mohammad VaezMousavi 3

1

2

3

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to determine the locus of arousal and activation effects on information processing stages. A number of 30 non-athlete female undergraduate students participated voluntarily in this study. They performed Reaction Time Analysis (RTA) task using Vienna test system while their electro-dermal activity was recorded continuously during performance using UFI instrument. Task- related activation was calculated for each participant using the difference between skin conductance levels (SCL) during the rest with one's during the task. Time used in each stage of information processing was also recorded. The results showed that activation was not correlated with duration of stimulus identification and response selection stages. Instead, and as a result of increase in activation, duration of response programming stage decreased. In conclusion, locus of activation effect was found on response programming stage.

مراجع
  1. Arcelin, R., Delignieres, D., & Brisswalter, J. (1998). Selective effects of physical exercise on choice reaction processes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87(1), 175-185.
  2. Arent, S. M., & Landers, D. M. (2003). Arousal, anxiety, and performance: A reexamination of the Inverted-U Hypothesis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74(4), 436-444.
  3. Audiffren, M., Tomporowski, P. D., & Zagrodnik, J. (2008). Acute aerobic exercise and information processing: Energizing motor processes during a choice reaction time task. Acta Psychologica, 129(3), 410-419.
  4. Bagherli, J., Vaez-Musavi, S. M., & Mokhtari, P. (2011). Effects of arousal and activation on simple and discriminative reaction time in a stimulated arousal state. World Applied Sciences journal, 12(10), 1877-1882.
  5. Barry, R. J., Clarke, A. R., McCarthy, R., Selikowitz, M., & Rushby, J. A. (2005). Arousal and activation in a continuous performance task: An exploration of state effects in normal children. journal of Psychophysiology, 19(2), 91-99.
  6. Becker, C. A., & Killion, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(3), 389-401.
  7. Compton, R. J., Banich, M. T., Mohanty, A., Milham, M. P., Herrington, J., Miller, G. A., . . . Heller, W. (2003). Paying attention to emotion: An fMRI investigation of cognitive and emotional stroop tasks. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 3(2), 81-96.
  8. Demoja, C. A., Reitano, M., & Caracciolo, E. (1985). General arousal and performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61(3), 747-753.
  9. Dresler, T., Meriau, K., Heekeren, H. R., & Van der Meer, E. (2009). Emotional Stroop task: effect of word arousal and subject anxiety on emotional interference. Psychol Res, 73(3), 364-371.
  10. Fairbrother, J. T. (2010). Fundamentals of motor behavior. Arab Ameri, E. & Taheri, M., Trans. 2013. 1st ed.  Tehran: elm va harekat  In Persian
  11. Henry, M. F., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “Memory Drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 31, 448–458.
  12. Higashiura, T., Nishihira, Y., Kamijo, K., Hatta, A., Kim, S. R., Hayashi, K., . . . Kuroiwa, K. (2006). The interactive effects of exercise intensity and duration on cognitive processing in the central nervous system. Advances in exercise and sports physiology, 12(1), 15-21.
  13. Jarvis, M. (1999). Sport psychology. Khajvand, N., Trans. 2001. 1st ed.  Tehran: Kowsar.  In Persian
  14. Jaskowski, P., Kurczewska, M., Nowik, A., Van der Lubbe, R. H., & Verleger, R. (2007). Locus of the intensity effect in simple reaction time tasks. Percept Psychophys, 69(8), 1334-1343.
  15. Jaskowski, P., Rybarczyk, K., Jaroszyk, F., & Lemanski, D. (1995). The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars), 55(1), 57-64.
  16. Jones, J. G., & Hardy, L. (1989). Stress and cognitive functioning in sport. J Sports Sci, 7(1), 41-63.
  17. Karami, A. (2007). Spielberger's state-trait anxiety inventory. from Psychometric publication center.In Persian
  18. Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple choice reaction time: The role of practice. journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(5), 1015-1027.
  19. Kosinski, R. J. (2005, September 2013). A literature review on reaction time.   Retrieved 2014/01/25, from http://biae.clemson.edu/bpc/bp/lab/110/reaction.htm#
  20. Lansing, R. W., Schwartz, E., & Lindsley, D. B. (1956). Reaction time and EEG activation. Amer. psychologist, 11, 433.
  21. Levitt, S., & Gutin, B. (1971). Multiple choice reaction time and movement time during physical exertion. Res Q, 42(4), 405-410.
  22. Magil, R. A. (2006). Motor learning: Concepts and applications.  8th ed.  New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  23. Magnuson, C. E., Wright, D. L., & Verwey, W. B. (2004). Changes in the incidental context impacts search but not loading of the motor buffer. Q J Exp Psychol A, 57(5), 935-951.
  24. Mulder, G. (1986). The concept and measurement of mental effort. In Hockey, R. J., Gaillard, A. W. K. & Coles, M. G. H. (Eds.), Energetics and human information processing (1st ed., Vol. 31, pp. 175-198). Dordrecht / Boston /Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, NATO Scientific Affairs Division.
  25. Neiss, R. (1990). Ending arousal's reign of error: A reply to Anderson. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 101-105.
  26. Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In Kantowitz, B. H. (Ed.), Human information: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41-82). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; distributed by the Halsted Press Division of Wiley, New York.
  27. Palef, S. R. (1973). Some stages of information processing in a choice reaction-time task. Percept Psychophys, 13(1), 41-44.
  28. Prescott, J. (1986). The effects of response parameters on CNV amplitude. Biol Psychol, 22(2), 107-135.
  29. Pribram, K. H., & McGuinness, D. (1975). Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention. Psychol Rev, 82(2), 116-149.
  30. Pribram, K. H., & McGuinness, D. (1992). Attention and para-attentional processing. Event-related brain potentials as tests of a model. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 658, 65-92.
  31. Rose, D. J., & Christina, R. W. (2006). Motor Control. Namazi zadeh, M. & Jalali, S., Trans. 2008. 1st ed.  Tehran: Nerci.  In Persian
  32. Rosenbaum, D. A., Inhoff, A. W., & Gordon, A. M. (1984). Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(3), 372-393.
  33. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Saltzman, E. (1984). A motor programm editor. In Prinz, W. & Sanders, A. F. (Eds.), Cognition and Motor Processes (1st ed., pp. 51 - 61). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
  34. Sanders, A. F. (1983). Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica, 53(1), 61-97.
  35. Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill.  Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  36. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 4th Revised ed.: Human Kinetics.
  37. Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach.  4th ed.: Champaign, Ill. ; Leeds : Human Kinetics.
  38. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev, 84(1), 1-66.
  39. Schröter, H., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Effects of response sequence length on motor programming: A chronometric analysis. Acta Psychologica, 128(1), 186-196.
  40. Shepperd, J. A., Grace, J., Cole, L. J., & Klein, C. (2005). Anxiety and outcome predictions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 31(2), 267-275.
  41. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
  42. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: comparisons of speech and typewriting. In Stelmach, G. E. (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117-152): Academic Press.
  43. VaezMousavi, S. M., Barry, R. J., & Clarke, A. R. (2009). Individual differences in task-related activation and performance. Physiology & Behavior, 98(3), 326-330.
  44. VaezMousavi, S. M., Barry, R. J., Rushby, J. A., & Clarke, A. R. (2007a). Evidence for differentiation of arousal and activation in normal adults. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars), 67(2), 179-186.
  45. VaezMousavi, S. M., Barry, R. J., Rushby, J. A., & Clarke, A. R. (2007b). Arousal and activation effects on physiological and behavioral responding during a continuous performance task. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars), 67(4), 461-470.
  46. VaezMousavi, S. M., & Osanlu, M. (2011). Skin conductance level predicts performance in a balance task. World Journal of Sport Sciences, 4(2), 139-143.
  47. Verwey, W. B. (1999). Evidence for a multistage model of practice in a sequential movement task. journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1693-1708.
  48. Welford, A. T. (1980). Choice reaction time: Basic concepts. In Welford, A. T. (Ed.), Reaction Times (pp. 73-128). New York: Academic Press.
  49. Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology London: Methuen.
  50. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459-482.

مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی
دوره 4، شماره 14 - شماره پیاپی 14
اسفند 1394
صفحه 78-59
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 17 اسفند 1394
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 اسفند 1394
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار