نوع مقاله : مطالعه پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 عضو گروه رفتار حرکتی دانشکده تربیت بدنی دانشگاه الزهرا

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی الزهرا

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی باورهای فراشناختی و خودتنظیمی ورزشی ورزشکاران با سطح مختلف ورزشی بود. صد و پنجاه ورزشکار در سه سطح بر اساس معیارهای ورود به مطالعه انتخاب شدند. برای جمع آوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه‌های جمعیت شناختی، خودتنظیمی ورزشی و سنجش باورهای فراشناختی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد مردان در سطح ورزشی ماهر به طور معنادار باورهای فراشناختی و خودتنظیمی ورزشی بهتری نسبت به زنان در سطح ورزشی ماهر داشتند. زنان و مردان در سطح ورزشی خبره به طور معنادار دارای باورهای فراشناختی و خودتنظیمی ورزشی بالاتری نسبت به زنان و مردان با سطح ورزشی ماهر و مبتدی بودند. همچنین زنان و مردان در سطح ورزشی ماهر به طور معنادار دارای باورهای فراشناختی و خودتنظیمی ورزشی بالاتری نسبت به زنان و مردان با سطح مهارت مبتدی بودند. براساس نتایج مطالعة حاضر، فعالیت بدنی در سطوح ماهر و خبرگی جهت ارتقاء خودتنظیمی ورزشی و باورهای فراشناختی به ورزشکاران توصیه می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Comparison of Sport Self-Regulation and Meta-Cognition Beliefs Between Athletes with Three Different Levels of Skill

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research was to investigate the comparison of meta-cognition beliefs and sport self-regulation between athletes with three different levels of skill. Based on Inclusion and exclusion criteria, one hundred and fifty athletes were selected in three levels of elite,expert and novice. To data collection, the demographic, sport self regulation and meta-cognition questionnaires were used. Results showed that the men with expert level were significantly better than women with expert level in meta-cognition beliefs and sport self-regulation. Also, the men and women athletes with elite level were significantly higher than athletes with expert and beginner level in Meta-cognition beliefs and sport self-regulation. Furthermore, the men and women athletes with expert level were significantly higher than athletes with beginner level in these variables. Based on the present research results, could be recommended the physical activity with expert and elite level to promote the sport self-regulation and meta-cognition beliefs.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Meta Cognition Beliefs
  • Self-Regulation of Sports
  • Skill Level
  • Gender
  1. Al-rawahi. (2015). Self-Regulated learning processes utilized by Omani Physical Education candidates in mastering sport skills. 1996-0794.
  2. Arazeshi, N., Mokhtari, P., Vaezmusavi, S. (2012). The effect of skill level athletes on the stage and off-stage stability movements. Motor Behavior, 10, 77-90.
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84,191-215.
  4. Beer, Nils. (2011). Effects of positive metacognitions and meta-emotions on coping, stress perception and emotions. (PhD), London Metropolitan University.
  5. Brick N., MacIntyre T, Campbell M. (2015). Meta cognitive processes in the self-regulation of performance in elite endurance runners. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 19: 1-9.
  6. Bluemke, M., Brand, R., Schweizer, G., and Kahlert, D. (2010). Exercise might be good for me, but I don’t feel good about it: do automatic associations predict exercise behavior? J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 32, 137–153.
  7. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Weinert, F., and Kluwe, R. (eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 65-116.
  8. Buckley, J., and Cameron, L. D. (2011a). Automatic judgments of exercise self-efficacy and exercise disengagement in adults experienced and inexperienced in exercise self-regulation. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 12, 324–332.
  9. Cole, J., Logan, T.K., Walker, R. (2011). Social exclusion, Personal control, Self-regulation, and Stress among Substance Abuse Treatment Clients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 113, 13-20.

10. De Bruin, M., Sheeran, P., Kok, G., Hiemstra, A., Prins, J. M., Hospers, H. J., et al. (2012). Self-regulatory processes mediate the intention-behavior relation for adherence and exercise behaviors. Health Psychol. 31, 695–703.

11. Digelidis N, Papaioannou A (1999). Age-group differences in intrinsic motivation, goal orientations and perceptions of athletic competence, physical appearance and motivational climate in Greek physical education. Scand. J. Med. Sports 9: 375-380.

12. Farokhi, A., Motasharei, A., Gholizadeh, A., Zakizade, S. (2009). Compare the normal mood states elite male and female badminton players. Sports Science Research Policy, 10, 1-12.

13. Gillison, F., Osborn, M., Standage, M., & Skevington, S. (2009). Exploring the Experience of Introjected Regulation for Exercise Across Gender in Adolescence, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(3), 309-319.

14. Goudas M, Dermitzaki I, Kolovelonis A. (2015). Self-regulated learning and students’ meta cognitive feelings in physical education. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 15-21.

 

15. Jonker L, Elferink-Gemser MT Visscher C (2011). The role of selfregulatory skills in sport and academic performances of elite youth athletes, Talent Development & Excellence, 3(2): 263-275.

16. Kim, B., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers & amp; Education, 52 (4): 800-810.

17. Lee, K.,Chen, L. (1996). The development of metacognitive knowledge of basic motorskill: Walking. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 157(3), 361-375.

18. MacIntyre, T., Igou, E. R., Moran, A. P., Campbell, M., & Matthews, J. (2014). Meta cognition and action: a new pathway to understanding social and cognitive aspects of expertise in sport. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1155.

19. McPherson, S. L., & Thomas, J. R. (1989). Relation of knowledge and performance in boys' tennis: Age and expertise. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48 (2), 190-211.

20. Ommundsen, Y. (2003). Implicit theories of ability and self-regulation strategies in physical education classes. Educational Psychology, 23, 141-157.

21. Pajares F (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in selfregulated learning. In D. H. Schunk& B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 111-139). New York: Erlbaum.

22. Papaioannou A, McDonald A (1993). Goal perspectives and purposes of physical education as perceived by Greek adolescents. Phys. Educ. Rev. 16: 41-48.

23. Pintrich PR, De Groot E (1990). Motivational and self-regulated components of classroom academic performance. J Educ Psychol 1990; 82: 33-40.

24. Pokay P, Blumenfeld P (1990). Predicting chievement early and late in semester: the role of motivation and use of learning strategies. J. Educ. Psychol. 82: 41-50.

25. Rahmanian, Z, Vaez Mousavi, MK, Sohrabi, M. (2013). Characteristics of the psychometric assessment exercise self-regulation. Journal of Sport Psychology, third year, 8,19-32.

26. Rahmanian, Z, Vaez Mousavi, MK. (2012). Psychometric characteristics of the MCQ and positive Frahyjan athletes. Journal of Sport Psychology, 3(8): 32-41.

27. Settanni, M., Magistro, D., & Rabaglietti, E. (2012). Development and preliminary validation of an instrument to measure meta cognition applied to physical activity during early adolescence. Cognition, Brain Behavior, an interdisciplinary Journal, (1), 67-87.

28. Solmon MA, Lee AM (1996). Entry characteristics, practice variables, and cognition: Student mediation of instruction. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 15: 136-150.

29. Swann, C., Moran, A. P., & Piggott, D. (2015). Dining elite athletes: Issues in the study of expert performance in sport psychology. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16,3-14.

30. Theodosiou, A., Mantis, K., & Papaioannou, A. (2008). Student self reports of meta cognitive activity in physical education classes. Age-group differences and the effect of goal orientations and perceived motivational climate. Educational Research and Review, 3 (12), 353-364.

31. Threkeld., R., & Brzoska.A. (1994). Research in Distance Education. In B.Willis (Ed), Distance Education: strategies and tools (pp.41-66).Englewood cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology publications.

32. Tsigilis N, Papaioannou A, Kosmidou E, Milosis D (2003). Gender differences on goal orientation based on the multidimensional hierarchical model. J. Hell. Soc. Sport Psychol. 14: 27-42. [In Greek]

33. Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and Emotion. A Clinical Perspective. Hove: Erlbaum.

34. Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1996). Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: The S-REF model. Behaviors Research and Therapy, 34,881-888.

35. Wells, A. (2000). Emotional Disorders and Meta cognition: Innovative Cognitive Therapy. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

36. Wells, A. (2009). Meta cognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression. New York: The Guilford Press.

37. White S (1993). The relationship between psychological Skills, experience, and practice commitment among collegiate male and female skiers. Sport Psychol. 7: 49-57.

38. White S, Duda J (1994). The relationship of gender, level of sport involvement, and participation motivation to task and ego orientation. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 25: 4-18.

39. White S (1995). The perceived purposes of sport among male and female intercollegiate and recreational sport participants. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 26: 490-502.

40. Zimmerman B, Martinez-Pons M (1990). Student differences in self regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self efficacy and strategy use. J. Educ. Psychol. 82: 51-69.